Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Hamstring Tightness and Lumbar Lordosis Angel Across Functional Sitting Posture. (LLA-HT)

2 de julio de 2026 actualizado por: Ahmed youssef saleh saeed, Cairo University

Correlation Between Hamstring Tightness and Lumbar Lordosis Angel Across Functional Sitting Posture in Sedentary Adults.

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the relationship between hamstring tightness and the lumbar lordosis angle in sedentary adults across different sitting postures. The main question it aims to answer is:

Is hamstring tightness related to the lumbar lordosis angle across three functional sitting postures (upright, slumped, and forward-leaning)? It also asks whether hamstring tightness differs between men and women, whether it differs between the dominant and non-dominant leg, and whether the lumbar lordosis angle differs between men and women across the three postures.

Participants will have their hamstring tightness measured with the Active Knee Extension test and their lumbar lordosis angle measured with a bubble inclinometer while sitting in each of the three postures.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Prolonged sitting is a defining feature of contemporary sedentary lifestyles and an established risk factor for musculoskeletal disorders of the lumbar spine. During sustained sitting, the hip is held in flexion and the hamstring muscle-tendon unit is maintained in a shortened position, which over time is associated with reduced hamstring extensibility (hamstring tightness). Because the hamstrings originate from the ischial tuberosity, a loss of hamstring extensibility exerts a posteriorly directed pull on the pelvis, promoting posterior pelvic tilt. Through regional spinopelvic coupling, this change in pelvic orientation alters the sacral slope and, consequently, the lumbar lordosis angle.

Although the relationship between hamstring tightness and lumbar lordosis has been described previously, most existing studies have evaluated it in the standing position. Sedentary individuals, however, spend the majority of their day seated, where the line of gravity, baseline muscle activity, and passive tissue demands placed on the spine differ substantially from those in standing. Evidence is therefore limited regarding how hamstring tightness relates to the lumbar lordosis angle across the functional sitting postures encountered in daily life, and regarding how this relationship may vary by sex and between the dominant and non-dominant lower limb.

This cross-sectional observational study will be conducted on 110 sedentary adults (55 male and 55 female), aged 18 to 45 years, recruited according to predefined eligibility criteria. The sample size was determined using G*Power based on a bivariate-normal correlation model. Eligible participants will be sedentary (more than six hours of sitting per day and a physical-activity level below 600 MET-minutes/week on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire), with a body mass index below 30 kg/m², bilateral hamstring tightness, and no current low back pain or other exclusionary conditions.

Following screening and informed consent, each participant's demographic and anthropometric data will be recorded, and lower-limb dominance will be determined using a three-task behavioral battery. Hamstring tightness will be assessed bilaterally using the Active Knee Extension (AKE) test, recorded with a digital goniometer, with the mean of three trials used for analysis. The lumbar lordosis angle (T12-S2) will be measured using a double bubble inclinometer in three randomized functional sitting postures-upright, slumped, and forward-leaning-with the mean of three trials per posture used for analysis.

The primary aim is to examine the correlation between hamstring tightness and the lumbar lordosis angle in each of the three sitting postures. The secondary aims are to compare hamstring tightness between male and female participants, to compare hamstring tightness between the dominant and non-dominant lower limb, and to compare the lumbar lordosis angle between male and female participants across the three postures. Data will be analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients, independent- and paired-samples t-tests, and a mixed-design analysis of variance, with the significance level set at p < 0.05.

Tipo de estudio

De observación

Inscripción (Estimado)

110

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Shubra Misr
      • Cairo, Shubra Misr, Egipto, 12616
        • Nasser institute hospital
        • Contacto:

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Método de muestreo

Muestra no probabilística

Población de estudio

Sedentary adults of both sexes, aged 18 to 45 years, recruited from the Nasser institute hospital, and the surrounding community. Eligible participants are healthy individuals with a sedentary lifestyle (more than six hours of sitting per day and a physical-activity level below 600 MET-minutes per week on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire), a body mass index below 30 kg/m², and bilateral hamstring tightness, with no current low back pain or other excluding musculoskeletal, neurological, or spinal conditions

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy adults aged 18-45 years.
  • Sedentary occupation requiring > 6 hours of sitting per day.
  • Active Knee Extension (AKE) angle >15°.
  • Bilateral hamstring tightness.
  • Sedentary individual as determined by IPAQ (MET≤ 600 min/week).
  • Asymptomatic for low back pain at the time of testing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of significant low back pain requiring medical treatment in the past 12 months.
  • Previous spinal surgery or structural spinal deformities.
  • Lower extremity injury or surgery within the past 6 months.
  • Neurological disorders affecting sensation or movement.
  • Pregnant female or get birth in the last year.
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m².
  • postural deviations resulting from shortening of the iliopsoas and erector spinae or insufficiency of the core stabilizers and hip extensors

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

Cohortes e Intervenciones

Grupo / Cohorte
Intervención / Tratamiento
Sedentary adults
Sedentary adults aged 18-45 years (55 male, 55 female) with bilateral hamstring tightness and no current low back pain, assessed for hamstring tightness (Active Knee Extension test) and lumbar lordosis angle (bubble inclinometer) across three functional sitting postures (upright, slumped, and forward-leaning).
Hamstring tightness measured bilaterally with the Active Knee Extension test (digital goniometer) and lumbar lordosis angle (T12-S2) measured with a bubble inclinometer across three functional sitting postures. No therapeutic intervention is administered; these are observational measurements only.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Correlation between hamstring tightness and lumbar lordosis angle across three functional sitting postures
Periodo de tiempo: At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Hamstring tightness is measured as the Active Knee Extension (AKE) deficit in degrees (mean of three trials per limb, using a digital goniometer). The lumbar lordosis angle is measured in degrees using a bubble inclinometer (T12-S2, mean of three trials per posture) in three functional sitting postures: upright, slumped, and forward-leaning. The association between hamstring tightness and the lumbar lordosis angle is assessed for each posture using the Pearson correlation coefficient.
At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Difference in hamstring tightness between males and females
Periodo de tiempo: At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Hamstring tightness (bilateral mean Active Knee Extension deficit, in degrees) compared between male and female participants.
At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Difference in hamstring tightness between the dominant and non-dominant lower limb
Periodo de tiempo: At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Hamstring tightness (Active Knee Extension deficit, in degrees) compared between the dominant and non-dominant limb. Limb dominance is determined using a three-task behavioral battery.
At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Difference in lumbar lordosis angle between males and females across the three sitting postures
Periodo de tiempo: At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Lumbar lordosis angle (degrees, bubble inclinometer, T12-S2) compared between male and female participants in each of the three functional sitting postures (upright, slumped, forward-leaning).
At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de agosto de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de octubre de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de diciembre de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

27 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

27 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

2 de julio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

6 de julio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

2 de julio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de julio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.

Sí

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir