Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Hamstring Tightness and Lumbar Lordosis Angel Across Functional Sitting Posture. (LLA-HT)

2 juli 2026 bijgewerkt door: Ahmed youssef saleh saeed, Cairo University

Correlation Between Hamstring Tightness and Lumbar Lordosis Angel Across Functional Sitting Posture in Sedentary Adults.

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the relationship between hamstring tightness and the lumbar lordosis angle in sedentary adults across different sitting postures. The main question it aims to answer is:

Is hamstring tightness related to the lumbar lordosis angle across three functional sitting postures (upright, slumped, and forward-leaning)? It also asks whether hamstring tightness differs between men and women, whether it differs between the dominant and non-dominant leg, and whether the lumbar lordosis angle differs between men and women across the three postures.

Participants will have their hamstring tightness measured with the Active Knee Extension test and their lumbar lordosis angle measured with a bubble inclinometer while sitting in each of the three postures.

Studie Overzicht

Gedetailleerde beschrijving

Prolonged sitting is a defining feature of contemporary sedentary lifestyles and an established risk factor for musculoskeletal disorders of the lumbar spine. During sustained sitting, the hip is held in flexion and the hamstring muscle-tendon unit is maintained in a shortened position, which over time is associated with reduced hamstring extensibility (hamstring tightness). Because the hamstrings originate from the ischial tuberosity, a loss of hamstring extensibility exerts a posteriorly directed pull on the pelvis, promoting posterior pelvic tilt. Through regional spinopelvic coupling, this change in pelvic orientation alters the sacral slope and, consequently, the lumbar lordosis angle.

Although the relationship between hamstring tightness and lumbar lordosis has been described previously, most existing studies have evaluated it in the standing position. Sedentary individuals, however, spend the majority of their day seated, where the line of gravity, baseline muscle activity, and passive tissue demands placed on the spine differ substantially from those in standing. Evidence is therefore limited regarding how hamstring tightness relates to the lumbar lordosis angle across the functional sitting postures encountered in daily life, and regarding how this relationship may vary by sex and between the dominant and non-dominant lower limb.

This cross-sectional observational study will be conducted on 110 sedentary adults (55 male and 55 female), aged 18 to 45 years, recruited according to predefined eligibility criteria. The sample size was determined using G*Power based on a bivariate-normal correlation model. Eligible participants will be sedentary (more than six hours of sitting per day and a physical-activity level below 600 MET-minutes/week on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire), with a body mass index below 30 kg/m², bilateral hamstring tightness, and no current low back pain or other exclusionary conditions.

Following screening and informed consent, each participant's demographic and anthropometric data will be recorded, and lower-limb dominance will be determined using a three-task behavioral battery. Hamstring tightness will be assessed bilaterally using the Active Knee Extension (AKE) test, recorded with a digital goniometer, with the mean of three trials used for analysis. The lumbar lordosis angle (T12-S2) will be measured using a double bubble inclinometer in three randomized functional sitting postures-upright, slumped, and forward-leaning-with the mean of three trials per posture used for analysis.

The primary aim is to examine the correlation between hamstring tightness and the lumbar lordosis angle in each of the three sitting postures. The secondary aims are to compare hamstring tightness between male and female participants, to compare hamstring tightness between the dominant and non-dominant lower limb, and to compare the lumbar lordosis angle between male and female participants across the three postures. Data will be analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients, independent- and paired-samples t-tests, and a mixed-design analysis of variance, with the significance level set at p < 0.05.

Studietype

Observationeel

Inschrijving (Geschat)

110

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studiecontact

Studie Locaties

    • Shubra Misr
      • Cairo, Shubra Misr, Egypte, 12616

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

  • Volwassen

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Ja

Bemonsteringsmethode

Niet-waarschijnlijkheidssteekproef

Studie Bevolking

Sedentary adults of both sexes, aged 18 to 45 years, recruited from the Nasser institute hospital, and the surrounding community. Eligible participants are healthy individuals with a sedentary lifestyle (more than six hours of sitting per day and a physical-activity level below 600 MET-minutes per week on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire), a body mass index below 30 kg/m², and bilateral hamstring tightness, with no current low back pain or other excluding musculoskeletal, neurological, or spinal conditions

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy adults aged 18-45 years.
  • Sedentary occupation requiring > 6 hours of sitting per day.
  • Active Knee Extension (AKE) angle >15°.
  • Bilateral hamstring tightness.
  • Sedentary individual as determined by IPAQ (MET≤ 600 min/week).
  • Asymptomatic for low back pain at the time of testing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of significant low back pain requiring medical treatment in the past 12 months.
  • Previous spinal surgery or structural spinal deformities.
  • Lower extremity injury or surgery within the past 6 months.
  • Neurological disorders affecting sensation or movement.
  • Pregnant female or get birth in the last year.
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m².
  • postural deviations resulting from shortening of the iliopsoas and erector spinae or insufficiency of the core stabilizers and hip extensors

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

Cohorten en interventies

Groep / Cohort
Interventie / Behandeling
Sedentary adults
Sedentary adults aged 18-45 years (55 male, 55 female) with bilateral hamstring tightness and no current low back pain, assessed for hamstring tightness (Active Knee Extension test) and lumbar lordosis angle (bubble inclinometer) across three functional sitting postures (upright, slumped, and forward-leaning).
Hamstring tightness measured bilaterally with the Active Knee Extension test (digital goniometer) and lumbar lordosis angle (T12-S2) measured with a bubble inclinometer across three functional sitting postures. No therapeutic intervention is administered; these are observational measurements only.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Correlation between hamstring tightness and lumbar lordosis angle across three functional sitting postures
Tijdsspanne: At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Hamstring tightness is measured as the Active Knee Extension (AKE) deficit in degrees (mean of three trials per limb, using a digital goniometer). The lumbar lordosis angle is measured in degrees using a bubble inclinometer (T12-S2, mean of three trials per posture) in three functional sitting postures: upright, slumped, and forward-leaning. The association between hamstring tightness and the lumbar lordosis angle is assessed for each posture using the Pearson correlation coefficient.
At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Difference in hamstring tightness between males and females
Tijdsspanne: At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Hamstring tightness (bilateral mean Active Knee Extension deficit, in degrees) compared between male and female participants.
At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Difference in hamstring tightness between the dominant and non-dominant lower limb
Tijdsspanne: At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Hamstring tightness (Active Knee Extension deficit, in degrees) compared between the dominant and non-dominant limb. Limb dominance is determined using a three-task behavioral battery.
At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Difference in lumbar lordosis angle between males and females across the three sitting postures
Tijdsspanne: At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Lumbar lordosis angle (degrees, bubble inclinometer, T12-S2) compared between male and female participants in each of the three functional sitting postures (upright, slumped, forward-leaning).
At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Geschat)

1 augustus 2026

Primaire voltooiing (Geschat)

1 oktober 2026

Studie voltooiing (Geschat)

1 december 2026

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

27 juni 2026

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

27 juni 2026

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

2 juli 2026

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

6 juli 2026

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

2 juli 2026

Laatst geverifieerd

1 juli 2026

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

NEE

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

product vervaardigd in en geëxporteerd uit de V.S.

Ja

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren