Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Hamstring Tightness and Lumbar Lordosis Angel Across Functional Sitting Posture. (LLA-HT)

2 luglio 2026 aggiornato da: Ahmed youssef saleh saeed, Cairo University

Correlation Between Hamstring Tightness and Lumbar Lordosis Angel Across Functional Sitting Posture in Sedentary Adults.

The goal of this observational study is to learn about the relationship between hamstring tightness and the lumbar lordosis angle in sedentary adults across different sitting postures. The main question it aims to answer is:

Is hamstring tightness related to the lumbar lordosis angle across three functional sitting postures (upright, slumped, and forward-leaning)? It also asks whether hamstring tightness differs between men and women, whether it differs between the dominant and non-dominant leg, and whether the lumbar lordosis angle differs between men and women across the three postures.

Participants will have their hamstring tightness measured with the Active Knee Extension test and their lumbar lordosis angle measured with a bubble inclinometer while sitting in each of the three postures.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Prolonged sitting is a defining feature of contemporary sedentary lifestyles and an established risk factor for musculoskeletal disorders of the lumbar spine. During sustained sitting, the hip is held in flexion and the hamstring muscle-tendon unit is maintained in a shortened position, which over time is associated with reduced hamstring extensibility (hamstring tightness). Because the hamstrings originate from the ischial tuberosity, a loss of hamstring extensibility exerts a posteriorly directed pull on the pelvis, promoting posterior pelvic tilt. Through regional spinopelvic coupling, this change in pelvic orientation alters the sacral slope and, consequently, the lumbar lordosis angle.

Although the relationship between hamstring tightness and lumbar lordosis has been described previously, most existing studies have evaluated it in the standing position. Sedentary individuals, however, spend the majority of their day seated, where the line of gravity, baseline muscle activity, and passive tissue demands placed on the spine differ substantially from those in standing. Evidence is therefore limited regarding how hamstring tightness relates to the lumbar lordosis angle across the functional sitting postures encountered in daily life, and regarding how this relationship may vary by sex and between the dominant and non-dominant lower limb.

This cross-sectional observational study will be conducted on 110 sedentary adults (55 male and 55 female), aged 18 to 45 years, recruited according to predefined eligibility criteria. The sample size was determined using G*Power based on a bivariate-normal correlation model. Eligible participants will be sedentary (more than six hours of sitting per day and a physical-activity level below 600 MET-minutes/week on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire), with a body mass index below 30 kg/m², bilateral hamstring tightness, and no current low back pain or other exclusionary conditions.

Following screening and informed consent, each participant's demographic and anthropometric data will be recorded, and lower-limb dominance will be determined using a three-task behavioral battery. Hamstring tightness will be assessed bilaterally using the Active Knee Extension (AKE) test, recorded with a digital goniometer, with the mean of three trials used for analysis. The lumbar lordosis angle (T12-S2) will be measured using a double bubble inclinometer in three randomized functional sitting postures-upright, slumped, and forward-leaning-with the mean of three trials per posture used for analysis.

The primary aim is to examine the correlation between hamstring tightness and the lumbar lordosis angle in each of the three sitting postures. The secondary aims are to compare hamstring tightness between male and female participants, to compare hamstring tightness between the dominant and non-dominant lower limb, and to compare the lumbar lordosis angle between male and female participants across the three postures. Data will be analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients, independent- and paired-samples t-tests, and a mixed-design analysis of variance, with the significance level set at p < 0.05.

Tipo di studio

Osservativo

Iscrizione (Stimato)

110

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Luoghi di studio

    • Shubra Misr
      • Cairo, Shubra Misr, Egitto, 12616

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto

Accetta volontari sani

Metodo di campionamento

Campione non probabilistico

Popolazione di studio

Sedentary adults of both sexes, aged 18 to 45 years, recruited from the Nasser institute hospital, and the surrounding community. Eligible participants are healthy individuals with a sedentary lifestyle (more than six hours of sitting per day and a physical-activity level below 600 MET-minutes per week on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire), a body mass index below 30 kg/m², and bilateral hamstring tightness, with no current low back pain or other excluding musculoskeletal, neurological, or spinal conditions

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy adults aged 18-45 years.
  • Sedentary occupation requiring > 6 hours of sitting per day.
  • Active Knee Extension (AKE) angle >15°.
  • Bilateral hamstring tightness.
  • Sedentary individual as determined by IPAQ (MET≤ 600 min/week).
  • Asymptomatic for low back pain at the time of testing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of significant low back pain requiring medical treatment in the past 12 months.
  • Previous spinal surgery or structural spinal deformities.
  • Lower extremity injury or surgery within the past 6 months.
  • Neurological disorders affecting sensation or movement.
  • Pregnant female or get birth in the last year.
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m².
  • postural deviations resulting from shortening of the iliopsoas and erector spinae or insufficiency of the core stabilizers and hip extensors

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

Coorti e interventi

Gruppo / Coorte
Intervento / Trattamento
Sedentary adults
Sedentary adults aged 18-45 years (55 male, 55 female) with bilateral hamstring tightness and no current low back pain, assessed for hamstring tightness (Active Knee Extension test) and lumbar lordosis angle (bubble inclinometer) across three functional sitting postures (upright, slumped, and forward-leaning).
Hamstring tightness measured bilaterally with the Active Knee Extension test (digital goniometer) and lumbar lordosis angle (T12-S2) measured with a bubble inclinometer across three functional sitting postures. No therapeutic intervention is administered; these are observational measurements only.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Correlation between hamstring tightness and lumbar lordosis angle across three functional sitting postures
Lasso di tempo: At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Hamstring tightness is measured as the Active Knee Extension (AKE) deficit in degrees (mean of three trials per limb, using a digital goniometer). The lumbar lordosis angle is measured in degrees using a bubble inclinometer (T12-S2, mean of three trials per posture) in three functional sitting postures: upright, slumped, and forward-leaning. The association between hamstring tightness and the lumbar lordosis angle is assessed for each posture using the Pearson correlation coefficient.
At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Difference in hamstring tightness between males and females
Lasso di tempo: At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Hamstring tightness (bilateral mean Active Knee Extension deficit, in degrees) compared between male and female participants.
At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Difference in hamstring tightness between the dominant and non-dominant lower limb
Lasso di tempo: At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Hamstring tightness (Active Knee Extension deficit, in degrees) compared between the dominant and non-dominant limb. Limb dominance is determined using a three-task behavioral battery.
At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Difference in lumbar lordosis angle between males and females across the three sitting postures
Lasso di tempo: At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).
Lumbar lordosis angle (degrees, bubble inclinometer, T12-S2) compared between male and female participants in each of the three functional sitting postures (upright, slumped, forward-leaning).
At a single assessment session (cross-sectional; Day 1).

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 agosto 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 ottobre 2026

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 dicembre 2026

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

27 giugno 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

27 giugno 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

2 luglio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

6 luglio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

2 luglio 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 luglio 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

prodotto fabbricato ed esportato dagli Stati Uniti

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

3
Sottoscrivi