Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Application of the AI Platform iLN Based on DeepSeek in the Teaching of Lupus Nephritis

15 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Wang Ju'an, Nanjing University

Aim:

To evaluate the application effect of the teaching platform iLN in the teaching of lupus nephritis, aiming to provide practical experience and evidence-based support for the implementation of generative AI technology in professional medical education.

Method:

Based on the DeepSeek large language model, the investigators developed "iLN" - an interactive teaching platform for lupus nephritis. This platform integrates the latest authoritative textbooks, clinical guidelines, pathological atlases, and real clinical cases, and includes seven core modules, such as "case interaction", "knowledge teaching", and "AI question answering". The investigators conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on 50 fourth-year undergraduate students from Nanjing University School of Medicine to evaluate the effectiveness of the iLN platform compared to traditional teaching methods. The teaching effect was evaluated through objective test scores and questionnaires about student satisfaction and platform usability.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Les conditions

Description détaillée

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology is reshaping the landscape of medical education with unprecedented depth and breadth. From early rule-based teaching expert systems to the current generation of Generative AI (GAI) systems like ChatGPT and DeepSeek, the continuous evolution of technology has not only greatly enriched teaching methods but also fundamentally changed the ways knowledge is acquired, disseminated, and evaluated. Internationally, Generative AI (GAI) has been widely applied in creating virtual cases, constructing clinical simulation scenarios, assisting medical writing, and providing personalized learning plans for medical students. However, there are almost no dedicated large language model (GAI) teaching applications specifically for lupus nephritis (LN) worldwide. As the most common severe organ complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), LN affects approximately 50% to 70% of SLE patients with kidney involvement. Its diagnosis and treatment involve multiple complex processes, including the identification of clinical manifestations, the interpretation of immune markers, the assessment of renal pathological types, the quantification of disease activity, and the formulation of personalized treatment plans. All of these place extremely high demands on the knowledge integration and clinical reasoning skills of medical students. The traditional LN teaching model mainly relies on theoretical classroom lectures and is supplemented by static pathological image presentations. Some scholars have introduced problem-based learning (PBL) teaching models and integrated ideological and political education, but there are still significant deficiencies: (1) Knowledge update lag - In the field of LN, new diagnostic standards (such as the 2019 EULAR/ACR systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria), new pathological classifications (such as the 2018 ISN/RPS revised version), and new drug treatment regimens (such as belimumab) are constantly emerging, while the textbook revision cycle is relatively long, making it difficult for students to obtain the latest knowledge in a timely manner; (2) Lack of personalized teaching - Facing students with varying levels of basic knowledge, teachers find it difficult to meet the needs of different learning paces; students with weak foundations have difficulty understanding complex pathological mechanisms, while those with solid foundations may find the content too simplistic; (3) Insufficient clinical reasoning training - Traditional classrooms lack real clinical scenario simulations, and students listen passively rather than actively exploring, making it difficult for them to establish a complete clinical reasoning chain from "symptoms - signs - laboratory tests - pathology - diagnosis - treatment". In this context, building a GAI-assisted teaching platform specifically designed for LN teaching, fully leveraging the personalized interaction, dynamic content generation, and intelligent assessment capabilities of AI, is of great significance for teaching reform and innovation.

In this study, the investigators constructed an iLN interactive teaching platform for lupus nephritis based on the DeepSeek large language model and by integrating the latest authoritative textbooks, guidelines, and clinical pathology materials. Through a randomized controlled teaching trial, the investigators systematically evaluated the application effect of this platform in LN teaching, aiming to provide practical experience and evidence-based support for the implementation of GAI technology in specialized medical education.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

50

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

  • Nom: Hao Bao, Doctor.
  • Numéro de téléphone: 86-15062213937
  • E-mail: bhao@nju.edu.cn

Lieux d'étude

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, Chine, 210016
        • Nanjing university

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • As a student majoring in clinical medicine
  • Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to understand, read, or communicate in Chinese
  • Failure to participate in any stage of the study (e.g. in-class education session, or post-test)
  • Requesting withdrawal from the study

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Autre
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: GAI-assisted teaching group
GAI-assisted teaching group: Students used various platform modules for self-directed learning under the instructor's guidance: (1) In the "Case Interaction" module, students interacted with three virtual cases by inputting natural language questions (e.g., "Does the patient have edema?", "What is the patient's proteinuria level?", "What are the light microscopy results of the renal biopsy?"). The platform automatically determines the question type and provides the corresponding information, while the visualized patient model on the right side simultaneously highlights the affected systems already identified, and the case information acquisition progress bar is updated dynamically; (2) When students encounter difficulties, they can invoke DeepSeek in real time for immediate answers through the "AI Q&A" module; (3) After completing case interactions, students proactively summarized the history characteristics, with the instructor providing supplementary input; (4) The instructor guided
An iLN interactive teaching platform for lupus nephritis based on the DeepSeek large language model and by integrating the latest authoritative textbooks, guidelines, and clinical pathology materials.
Autre: Traditional teaching group
Traditional teaching group: Adopted the traditional PowerPoint (PPT) lecture mode. The instructor used uniformly prepared PPT courseware to sequentially lecture on the SLE overview, LN clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, pathological classification, diagnostic criteria, treatment plans, and prognosis evaluation. The courseware included static pathological and clinical manifestation images.
Adopted the traditional PowerPoint (PPT) lecture mode. The instructor used uniformly prepared PPT courseware to sequentially lecture on the SLE overview, LN clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, pathological classification, diagnostic criteria, treatment plans, and prognosis evaluation. The courseware included static pathological and clinical manifestation images.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Objective Test Scores
Délai: On the day of the end of the teaching session within 30 minutes after teaching session
Unified in-class objective test (20 multiple-choice questions, 5 points each, 100 points total),the higher the score, the better the performance.
On the day of the end of the teaching session within 30 minutes after teaching session

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Questionnaire Survey
Délai: On the day of the end of the teaching session within 60 minutes after teaching session.
Students in the GAI group filled out the questionnaire on the iLN platform, including overall satisfaction (satisfied/dissatisfied), and gave scores (from 1 to 5) on 12 dimensions such as the platform's interest, teaching novelty, content clarity, interface design, and learning effect improvement. They also submitted open-ended suggestions for improvement.
On the day of the end of the teaching session within 60 minutes after teaching session.

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 juillet 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

31 décembre 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

31 décembre 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

30 juin 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

15 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

16 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

16 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

15 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Description du régime IPD

Individual participant data will not be shared

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner