Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Application of the AI Platform iLN Based on DeepSeek in the Teaching of Lupus Nephritis

15. Juli 2026 aktualisiert von: Wang Ju'an, Nanjing University

Aim:

To evaluate the application effect of the teaching platform iLN in the teaching of lupus nephritis, aiming to provide practical experience and evidence-based support for the implementation of generative AI technology in professional medical education.

Method:

Based on the DeepSeek large language model, the investigators developed "iLN" - an interactive teaching platform for lupus nephritis. This platform integrates the latest authoritative textbooks, clinical guidelines, pathological atlases, and real clinical cases, and includes seven core modules, such as "case interaction", "knowledge teaching", and "AI question answering". The investigators conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on 50 fourth-year undergraduate students from Nanjing University School of Medicine to evaluate the effectiveness of the iLN platform compared to traditional teaching methods. The teaching effect was evaluated through objective test scores and questionnaires about student satisfaction and platform usability.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology is reshaping the landscape of medical education with unprecedented depth and breadth. From early rule-based teaching expert systems to the current generation of Generative AI (GAI) systems like ChatGPT and DeepSeek, the continuous evolution of technology has not only greatly enriched teaching methods but also fundamentally changed the ways knowledge is acquired, disseminated, and evaluated. Internationally, Generative AI (GAI) has been widely applied in creating virtual cases, constructing clinical simulation scenarios, assisting medical writing, and providing personalized learning plans for medical students. However, there are almost no dedicated large language model (GAI) teaching applications specifically for lupus nephritis (LN) worldwide. As the most common severe organ complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), LN affects approximately 50% to 70% of SLE patients with kidney involvement. Its diagnosis and treatment involve multiple complex processes, including the identification of clinical manifestations, the interpretation of immune markers, the assessment of renal pathological types, the quantification of disease activity, and the formulation of personalized treatment plans. All of these place extremely high demands on the knowledge integration and clinical reasoning skills of medical students. The traditional LN teaching model mainly relies on theoretical classroom lectures and is supplemented by static pathological image presentations. Some scholars have introduced problem-based learning (PBL) teaching models and integrated ideological and political education, but there are still significant deficiencies: (1) Knowledge update lag - In the field of LN, new diagnostic standards (such as the 2019 EULAR/ACR systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria), new pathological classifications (such as the 2018 ISN/RPS revised version), and new drug treatment regimens (such as belimumab) are constantly emerging, while the textbook revision cycle is relatively long, making it difficult for students to obtain the latest knowledge in a timely manner; (2) Lack of personalized teaching - Facing students with varying levels of basic knowledge, teachers find it difficult to meet the needs of different learning paces; students with weak foundations have difficulty understanding complex pathological mechanisms, while those with solid foundations may find the content too simplistic; (3) Insufficient clinical reasoning training - Traditional classrooms lack real clinical scenario simulations, and students listen passively rather than actively exploring, making it difficult for them to establish a complete clinical reasoning chain from "symptoms - signs - laboratory tests - pathology - diagnosis - treatment". In this context, building a GAI-assisted teaching platform specifically designed for LN teaching, fully leveraging the personalized interaction, dynamic content generation, and intelligent assessment capabilities of AI, is of great significance for teaching reform and innovation.

In this study, the investigators constructed an iLN interactive teaching platform for lupus nephritis based on the DeepSeek large language model and by integrating the latest authoritative textbooks, guidelines, and clinical pathology materials. Through a randomized controlled teaching trial, the investigators systematically evaluated the application effect of this platform in LN teaching, aiming to provide practical experience and evidence-based support for the implementation of GAI technology in specialized medical education.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

50

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

  • Name: Hao Bao, Doctor.
  • Telefonnummer: 86-15062213937
  • E-Mail: bhao@nju.edu.cn

Studienorte

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210016
        • Nanjing university

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • As a student majoring in clinical medicine
  • Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to understand, read, or communicate in Chinese
  • Failure to participate in any stage of the study (e.g. in-class education session, or post-test)
  • Requesting withdrawal from the study

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Sonstiges
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: GAI-assisted teaching group
GAI-assisted teaching group: Students used various platform modules for self-directed learning under the instructor's guidance: (1) In the "Case Interaction" module, students interacted with three virtual cases by inputting natural language questions (e.g., "Does the patient have edema?", "What is the patient's proteinuria level?", "What are the light microscopy results of the renal biopsy?"). The platform automatically determines the question type and provides the corresponding information, while the visualized patient model on the right side simultaneously highlights the affected systems already identified, and the case information acquisition progress bar is updated dynamically; (2) When students encounter difficulties, they can invoke DeepSeek in real time for immediate answers through the "AI Q&A" module; (3) After completing case interactions, students proactively summarized the history characteristics, with the instructor providing supplementary input; (4) The instructor guided
An iLN interactive teaching platform for lupus nephritis based on the DeepSeek large language model and by integrating the latest authoritative textbooks, guidelines, and clinical pathology materials.
Sonstiges: Traditional teaching group
Traditional teaching group: Adopted the traditional PowerPoint (PPT) lecture mode. The instructor used uniformly prepared PPT courseware to sequentially lecture on the SLE overview, LN clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, pathological classification, diagnostic criteria, treatment plans, and prognosis evaluation. The courseware included static pathological and clinical manifestation images.
Adopted the traditional PowerPoint (PPT) lecture mode. The instructor used uniformly prepared PPT courseware to sequentially lecture on the SLE overview, LN clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, pathological classification, diagnostic criteria, treatment plans, and prognosis evaluation. The courseware included static pathological and clinical manifestation images.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Objective Test Scores
Zeitfenster: On the day of the end of the teaching session within 30 minutes after teaching session
Unified in-class objective test (20 multiple-choice questions, 5 points each, 100 points total),the higher the score, the better the performance.
On the day of the end of the teaching session within 30 minutes after teaching session

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Questionnaire Survey
Zeitfenster: On the day of the end of the teaching session within 60 minutes after teaching session.
Students in the GAI group filled out the questionnaire on the iLN platform, including overall satisfaction (satisfied/dissatisfied), and gave scores (from 1 to 5) on 12 dimensions such as the platform's interest, teaching novelty, content clarity, interface design, and learning effect improvement. They also submitted open-ended suggestions for improvement.
On the day of the end of the teaching session within 60 minutes after teaching session.

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

1. Juli 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

31. Dezember 2026

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

31. Dezember 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

30. Juni 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

15. Juli 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

16. Juli 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

16. Juli 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

15. Juli 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Individual participant data will not be shared

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren