Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Application of the AI Platform iLN Based on DeepSeek in the Teaching of Lupus Nephritis

15 luglio 2026 aggiornato da: Wang Ju'an, Nanjing University

Aim:

To evaluate the application effect of the teaching platform iLN in the teaching of lupus nephritis, aiming to provide practical experience and evidence-based support for the implementation of generative AI technology in professional medical education.

Method:

Based on the DeepSeek large language model, the investigators developed "iLN" - an interactive teaching platform for lupus nephritis. This platform integrates the latest authoritative textbooks, clinical guidelines, pathological atlases, and real clinical cases, and includes seven core modules, such as "case interaction", "knowledge teaching", and "AI question answering". The investigators conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on 50 fourth-year undergraduate students from Nanjing University School of Medicine to evaluate the effectiveness of the iLN platform compared to traditional teaching methods. The teaching effect was evaluated through objective test scores and questionnaires about student satisfaction and platform usability.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Non ancora reclutamento

Condizioni

Descrizione dettagliata

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology is reshaping the landscape of medical education with unprecedented depth and breadth. From early rule-based teaching expert systems to the current generation of Generative AI (GAI) systems like ChatGPT and DeepSeek, the continuous evolution of technology has not only greatly enriched teaching methods but also fundamentally changed the ways knowledge is acquired, disseminated, and evaluated. Internationally, Generative AI (GAI) has been widely applied in creating virtual cases, constructing clinical simulation scenarios, assisting medical writing, and providing personalized learning plans for medical students. However, there are almost no dedicated large language model (GAI) teaching applications specifically for lupus nephritis (LN) worldwide. As the most common severe organ complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), LN affects approximately 50% to 70% of SLE patients with kidney involvement. Its diagnosis and treatment involve multiple complex processes, including the identification of clinical manifestations, the interpretation of immune markers, the assessment of renal pathological types, the quantification of disease activity, and the formulation of personalized treatment plans. All of these place extremely high demands on the knowledge integration and clinical reasoning skills of medical students. The traditional LN teaching model mainly relies on theoretical classroom lectures and is supplemented by static pathological image presentations. Some scholars have introduced problem-based learning (PBL) teaching models and integrated ideological and political education, but there are still significant deficiencies: (1) Knowledge update lag - In the field of LN, new diagnostic standards (such as the 2019 EULAR/ACR systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria), new pathological classifications (such as the 2018 ISN/RPS revised version), and new drug treatment regimens (such as belimumab) are constantly emerging, while the textbook revision cycle is relatively long, making it difficult for students to obtain the latest knowledge in a timely manner; (2) Lack of personalized teaching - Facing students with varying levels of basic knowledge, teachers find it difficult to meet the needs of different learning paces; students with weak foundations have difficulty understanding complex pathological mechanisms, while those with solid foundations may find the content too simplistic; (3) Insufficient clinical reasoning training - Traditional classrooms lack real clinical scenario simulations, and students listen passively rather than actively exploring, making it difficult for them to establish a complete clinical reasoning chain from "symptoms - signs - laboratory tests - pathology - diagnosis - treatment". In this context, building a GAI-assisted teaching platform specifically designed for LN teaching, fully leveraging the personalized interaction, dynamic content generation, and intelligent assessment capabilities of AI, is of great significance for teaching reform and innovation.

In this study, the investigators constructed an iLN interactive teaching platform for lupus nephritis based on the DeepSeek large language model and by integrating the latest authoritative textbooks, guidelines, and clinical pathology materials. Through a randomized controlled teaching trial, the investigators systematically evaluated the application effect of this platform in LN teaching, aiming to provide practical experience and evidence-based support for the implementation of GAI technology in specialized medical education.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

50

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

  • Nome: Hao Bao, Doctor.
  • Numero di telefono: 86-15062213937
  • Email: bhao@nju.edu.cn

Luoghi di studio

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, Cina, 210016
        • Nanjing university

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • As a student majoring in clinical medicine
  • Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to understand, read, or communicate in Chinese
  • Failure to participate in any stage of the study (e.g. in-class education session, or post-test)
  • Requesting withdrawal from the study

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Altro
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: GAI-assisted teaching group
GAI-assisted teaching group: Students used various platform modules for self-directed learning under the instructor's guidance: (1) In the "Case Interaction" module, students interacted with three virtual cases by inputting natural language questions (e.g., "Does the patient have edema?", "What is the patient's proteinuria level?", "What are the light microscopy results of the renal biopsy?"). The platform automatically determines the question type and provides the corresponding information, while the visualized patient model on the right side simultaneously highlights the affected systems already identified, and the case information acquisition progress bar is updated dynamically; (2) When students encounter difficulties, they can invoke DeepSeek in real time for immediate answers through the "AI Q&A" module; (3) After completing case interactions, students proactively summarized the history characteristics, with the instructor providing supplementary input; (4) The instructor guided
An iLN interactive teaching platform for lupus nephritis based on the DeepSeek large language model and by integrating the latest authoritative textbooks, guidelines, and clinical pathology materials.
Altro: Traditional teaching group
Traditional teaching group: Adopted the traditional PowerPoint (PPT) lecture mode. The instructor used uniformly prepared PPT courseware to sequentially lecture on the SLE overview, LN clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, pathological classification, diagnostic criteria, treatment plans, and prognosis evaluation. The courseware included static pathological and clinical manifestation images.
Adopted the traditional PowerPoint (PPT) lecture mode. The instructor used uniformly prepared PPT courseware to sequentially lecture on the SLE overview, LN clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, pathological classification, diagnostic criteria, treatment plans, and prognosis evaluation. The courseware included static pathological and clinical manifestation images.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Objective Test Scores
Lasso di tempo: On the day of the end of the teaching session within 30 minutes after teaching session
Unified in-class objective test (20 multiple-choice questions, 5 points each, 100 points total),the higher the score, the better the performance.
On the day of the end of the teaching session within 30 minutes after teaching session

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Questionnaire Survey
Lasso di tempo: On the day of the end of the teaching session within 60 minutes after teaching session.
Students in the GAI group filled out the questionnaire on the iLN platform, including overall satisfaction (satisfied/dissatisfied), and gave scores (from 1 to 5) on 12 dimensions such as the platform's interest, teaching novelty, content clarity, interface design, and learning effect improvement. They also submitted open-ended suggestions for improvement.
On the day of the end of the teaching session within 60 minutes after teaching session.

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 luglio 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

31 dicembre 2026

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

31 dicembre 2026

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

30 giugno 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

15 luglio 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

16 luglio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

16 luglio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

15 luglio 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 luglio 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Descrizione del piano IPD

Individual participant data will not be shared

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi