Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Application of the AI Platform iLN Based on DeepSeek in the Teaching of Lupus Nephritis

15 de julio de 2026 actualizado por: Wang Ju'an, Nanjing University

Aim:

To evaluate the application effect of the teaching platform iLN in the teaching of lupus nephritis, aiming to provide practical experience and evidence-based support for the implementation of generative AI technology in professional medical education.

Method:

Based on the DeepSeek large language model, the investigators developed "iLN" - an interactive teaching platform for lupus nephritis. This platform integrates the latest authoritative textbooks, clinical guidelines, pathological atlases, and real clinical cases, and includes seven core modules, such as "case interaction", "knowledge teaching", and "AI question answering". The investigators conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on 50 fourth-year undergraduate students from Nanjing University School of Medicine to evaluate the effectiveness of the iLN platform compared to traditional teaching methods. The teaching effect was evaluated through objective test scores and questionnaires about student satisfaction and platform usability.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Condiciones

Descripción detallada

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology is reshaping the landscape of medical education with unprecedented depth and breadth. From early rule-based teaching expert systems to the current generation of Generative AI (GAI) systems like ChatGPT and DeepSeek, the continuous evolution of technology has not only greatly enriched teaching methods but also fundamentally changed the ways knowledge is acquired, disseminated, and evaluated. Internationally, Generative AI (GAI) has been widely applied in creating virtual cases, constructing clinical simulation scenarios, assisting medical writing, and providing personalized learning plans for medical students. However, there are almost no dedicated large language model (GAI) teaching applications specifically for lupus nephritis (LN) worldwide. As the most common severe organ complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), LN affects approximately 50% to 70% of SLE patients with kidney involvement. Its diagnosis and treatment involve multiple complex processes, including the identification of clinical manifestations, the interpretation of immune markers, the assessment of renal pathological types, the quantification of disease activity, and the formulation of personalized treatment plans. All of these place extremely high demands on the knowledge integration and clinical reasoning skills of medical students. The traditional LN teaching model mainly relies on theoretical classroom lectures and is supplemented by static pathological image presentations. Some scholars have introduced problem-based learning (PBL) teaching models and integrated ideological and political education, but there are still significant deficiencies: (1) Knowledge update lag - In the field of LN, new diagnostic standards (such as the 2019 EULAR/ACR systemic lupus erythematosus classification criteria), new pathological classifications (such as the 2018 ISN/RPS revised version), and new drug treatment regimens (such as belimumab) are constantly emerging, while the textbook revision cycle is relatively long, making it difficult for students to obtain the latest knowledge in a timely manner; (2) Lack of personalized teaching - Facing students with varying levels of basic knowledge, teachers find it difficult to meet the needs of different learning paces; students with weak foundations have difficulty understanding complex pathological mechanisms, while those with solid foundations may find the content too simplistic; (3) Insufficient clinical reasoning training - Traditional classrooms lack real clinical scenario simulations, and students listen passively rather than actively exploring, making it difficult for them to establish a complete clinical reasoning chain from "symptoms - signs - laboratory tests - pathology - diagnosis - treatment". In this context, building a GAI-assisted teaching platform specifically designed for LN teaching, fully leveraging the personalized interaction, dynamic content generation, and intelligent assessment capabilities of AI, is of great significance for teaching reform and innovation.

In this study, the investigators constructed an iLN interactive teaching platform for lupus nephritis based on the DeepSeek large language model and by integrating the latest authoritative textbooks, guidelines, and clinical pathology materials. Through a randomized controlled teaching trial, the investigators systematically evaluated the application effect of this platform in LN teaching, aiming to provide practical experience and evidence-based support for the implementation of GAI technology in specialized medical education.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

50

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Hao Bao, Doctor.
  • Número de teléfono: 86-15062213937
  • Correo electrónico: bhao@nju.edu.cn

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, Porcelana, 210016
        • Nanjing university

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • As a student majoring in clinical medicine
  • Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to understand, read, or communicate in Chinese
  • Failure to participate in any stage of the study (e.g. in-class education session, or post-test)
  • Requesting withdrawal from the study

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Otro
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: GAI-assisted teaching group
GAI-assisted teaching group: Students used various platform modules for self-directed learning under the instructor's guidance: (1) In the "Case Interaction" module, students interacted with three virtual cases by inputting natural language questions (e.g., "Does the patient have edema?", "What is the patient's proteinuria level?", "What are the light microscopy results of the renal biopsy?"). The platform automatically determines the question type and provides the corresponding information, while the visualized patient model on the right side simultaneously highlights the affected systems already identified, and the case information acquisition progress bar is updated dynamically; (2) When students encounter difficulties, they can invoke DeepSeek in real time for immediate answers through the "AI Q&A" module; (3) After completing case interactions, students proactively summarized the history characteristics, with the instructor providing supplementary input; (4) The instructor guided
An iLN interactive teaching platform for lupus nephritis based on the DeepSeek large language model and by integrating the latest authoritative textbooks, guidelines, and clinical pathology materials.
Otro: Traditional teaching group
Traditional teaching group: Adopted the traditional PowerPoint (PPT) lecture mode. The instructor used uniformly prepared PPT courseware to sequentially lecture on the SLE overview, LN clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, pathological classification, diagnostic criteria, treatment plans, and prognosis evaluation. The courseware included static pathological and clinical manifestation images.
Adopted the traditional PowerPoint (PPT) lecture mode. The instructor used uniformly prepared PPT courseware to sequentially lecture on the SLE overview, LN clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, pathological classification, diagnostic criteria, treatment plans, and prognosis evaluation. The courseware included static pathological and clinical manifestation images.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Objective Test Scores
Periodo de tiempo: On the day of the end of the teaching session within 30 minutes after teaching session
Unified in-class objective test (20 multiple-choice questions, 5 points each, 100 points total),the higher the score, the better the performance.
On the day of the end of the teaching session within 30 minutes after teaching session

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Questionnaire Survey
Periodo de tiempo: On the day of the end of the teaching session within 60 minutes after teaching session.
Students in the GAI group filled out the questionnaire on the iLN platform, including overall satisfaction (satisfied/dissatisfied), and gave scores (from 1 to 5) on 12 dimensions such as the platform's interest, teaching novelty, content clarity, interface design, and learning effect improvement. They also submitted open-ended suggestions for improvement.
On the day of the end of the teaching session within 60 minutes after teaching session.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de julio de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

31 de diciembre de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

31 de diciembre de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

30 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

15 de julio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

16 de julio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

16 de julio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

15 de julio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de julio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

Individual participant data will not be shared

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir