Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopy for Upper Ureteric Stones

18 août 2026 mis à jour par: Hanzla Arshad

Comparison of Treatment Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopy in Patients With Upper Ureteric Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Upper ureteric stones can be treated using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy breaks the stone using shock waves delivered from outside the body, whereas ureteroscopy involves passing a small instrument through the urinary tract to locate and fragment the stone.

This randomized controlled trial compared the effectiveness and safety of these two treatments in adults with a single upper ureteric stone smaller than 10 mm and a stone density of 1000 Hounsfield units or less. Participants were assigned to receive either extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or semirigid ureteroscopy. The main outcome was complete stone clearance on non-contrast computed tomography four weeks after completion of the assigned treatment. Pain relief, number of treatment sessions and treatment-related complications were also assessed.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

This single-centre, randomized, parallel-group controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Urology, Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. The objective was to compare the treatment efficacy and short-term safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with semirigid ureteroscopy (URS) in patients presenting with an upper ureteric stone.

A total of 100 participants aged 18-75 years were enrolled. Eligible participants had a single unilateral upper ureteric stone located above the sacroiliac joint. The stone was confirmed on non-contrast computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder, measured less than 10 mm in maximum diameter and had a density of 1000 Hounsfield units or less. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio by lottery, with 50 participants assigned to each treatment group.

Participants assigned to ESWL were treated using the MODULITH SLX-F2 lithotripter. Shock waves were delivered at a rate of 60-120 shocks per minute, with an energy setting of 1-9 kV and approximately 2500-3000 shocks per session. Each session lasted approximately 30-60 minutes. A maximum of three sessions was permitted, with an interval of at least 48 hours between successive sessions.

Participants assigned to URS underwent semirigid ureteroscopy under general anesthesia using a 6.5-7.5 Fr semirigid ureteroscope. Stones were fragmented using the Swiss LithoClast Master pneumatic lithotripsy system with a 1-1.2 Fr probe. Stone fragments were removed using a Dormia basket or grasping forceps when required. A double-J ureteric stent was inserted in every participant undergoing URS and was subsequently removed according to clinical assessment.

The primary outcome was complete stone clearance, assessed using non-contrast computed tomography four weeks after completion of the assigned treatment. Complete stone clearance was defined as the absence of any residual stone or stone fragment in the ipsilateral kidney or ureter. A participant requiring an additional stone-removal procedure before the four-week assessment was classified as having treatment failure.

Secondary outcomes included the number of ESWL sessions required, pain relief, immediate procedure-related complications and complications occurring during the four-week follow-up period.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

100

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

  • Pakistan
      • Lahore, Pakistan, 54810
        • Sheikh Zayed Hospital

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female participant aged 18 to 75 years Single unilateral upper ureteric stone located above the sacroiliac joint Stone confirmed by non-contrast computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder Stone maximum diameter less than 10 mm Stone density of 1000 Hounsfield units or less Written informed consent provided Willing and able to complete the assigned treatment and four-week follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Solitary functioning kidney Bilateral ureteric stones Active urinary tract infection Deranged renal function Stone maximum diameter of 10 mm or greater Stone density greater than 1000 Hounsfield units Unable or unwilling to complete the assigned treatment or four-week follow-up

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
Participants received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using the MODULITH SLX-F2 lithotripter. A maximum of three sessions was permitted, with an interval of at least 48 hours between sessions.
Procédure: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
ESWL was performed using the MODULITH SLX-F2 lithotripter at 60-120 shocks per minute, an energy setting of 1-9 kV and approximately 2500-3000 shocks per session. Each session lasted approximately 30-60 minutes. Up to three sessions were permitted, with at least 48 hours between sessions.
Comparateur actif: Semirigid Ureteroscopy
Participants underwent semirigid ureteroscopy under general anesthesia with pneumatic stone fragmentation. Stone fragments were removed when required, and a double-J ureteric stent was inserted in all participants.
Procédure: Semirigid Ureteroscopy
Semirigid ureteroscopy was performed under general anesthesia using a 6.5-7.5 Fr ureteroscope. Stones were fragmented using the Swiss LithoClast Master pneumatic lithotripsy system with a 1-1.2 Fr probe. Fragments were removed using a Dormia basket or grasping forceps when required. A double-J ureteric stent was inserted in every participant and subsequently removed according to clinical assessment.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Complete Stone Clearance
Délai: 4 weeks after completion of the assigned treatment
Number of participants with complete stone clearance on non-contrast computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder. Complete stone clearance was defined as the absence of any residual stone or stone fragment in the ipsilateral kidney or ureter. Participants requiring an additional stone-removal procedure before assessment were classified as treatment failures.
4 weeks after completion of the assigned treatment

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Number of ESWL Sessions Required
Délai: Immediately after completion of the final ESWL treatment session
Number of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy sessions received by each participant assigned to the ESWL arm. Participants could receive a maximum of three sessions, with an interval of at least 48 hours between successive sessions.
Immediately after completion of the final ESWL treatment session

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Hanzla Arshad

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 décembre 2025

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 juin 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 juin 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

13 août 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

18 août 2026

Première publication (Réel)

19 août 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

19 août 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

18 août 2026

Dernière vérification

1 août 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • TERC/SC/INT/2025/570
  • Technical and Ethical Review C (Autre identifiant: Shaikh Zayed Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute)

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

Deidentified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the final publication will be available upon reasonable request. Data will be shared only after approval of a scientifically sound proposal and completion of a data-use agreement. Information that could identify individual participants will not be shared.

Délai de partage IPD

Beginning 3 months after publication of the study results and available for 5 years.

Critères d'accès au partage IPD

Researchers with a methodologically sound proposal may request access from the principal investigator. Requests must describe the research objectives, proposed analyses and data-security arrangements. Access will require approval by the principal investigator and completion of a data-use agreement. Data may be used only for the analyses specified in the approved proposal.

Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD

  • CIF

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner