Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopy for Upper Ureteric Stones

18 de agosto de 2026 atualizado por: Hanzla Arshad

Comparison of Treatment Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopy in Patients With Upper Ureteric Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Upper ureteric stones can be treated using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy breaks the stone using shock waves delivered from outside the body, whereas ureteroscopy involves passing a small instrument through the urinary tract to locate and fragment the stone.

This randomized controlled trial compared the effectiveness and safety of these two treatments in adults with a single upper ureteric stone smaller than 10 mm and a stone density of 1000 Hounsfield units or less. Participants were assigned to receive either extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or semirigid ureteroscopy. The main outcome was complete stone clearance on non-contrast computed tomography four weeks after completion of the assigned treatment. Pain relief, number of treatment sessions and treatment-related complications were also assessed.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Concluído

Condições

Intervenção / Tratamento

Descrição detalhada

This single-centre, randomized, parallel-group controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Urology, Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. The objective was to compare the treatment efficacy and short-term safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with semirigid ureteroscopy (URS) in patients presenting with an upper ureteric stone.

A total of 100 participants aged 18-75 years were enrolled. Eligible participants had a single unilateral upper ureteric stone located above the sacroiliac joint. The stone was confirmed on non-contrast computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder, measured less than 10 mm in maximum diameter and had a density of 1000 Hounsfield units or less. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio by lottery, with 50 participants assigned to each treatment group.

Participants assigned to ESWL were treated using the MODULITH SLX-F2 lithotripter. Shock waves were delivered at a rate of 60-120 shocks per minute, with an energy setting of 1-9 kV and approximately 2500-3000 shocks per session. Each session lasted approximately 30-60 minutes. A maximum of three sessions was permitted, with an interval of at least 48 hours between successive sessions.

Participants assigned to URS underwent semirigid ureteroscopy under general anesthesia using a 6.5-7.5 Fr semirigid ureteroscope. Stones were fragmented using the Swiss LithoClast Master pneumatic lithotripsy system with a 1-1.2 Fr probe. Stone fragments were removed using a Dormia basket or grasping forceps when required. A double-J ureteric stent was inserted in every participant undergoing URS and was subsequently removed according to clinical assessment.

The primary outcome was complete stone clearance, assessed using non-contrast computed tomography four weeks after completion of the assigned treatment. Complete stone clearance was defined as the absence of any residual stone or stone fragment in the ipsilateral kidney or ureter. A participant requiring an additional stone-removal procedure before the four-week assessment was classified as having treatment failure.

Secondary outcomes included the number of ESWL sessions required, pain relief, immediate procedure-related complications and complications occurring during the four-week follow-up period.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

100

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

  • Paquistão
      • Lahore, Paquistão, 54810
        • Sheikh Zayed Hospital

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female participant aged 18 to 75 years Single unilateral upper ureteric stone located above the sacroiliac joint Stone confirmed by non-contrast computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder Stone maximum diameter less than 10 mm Stone density of 1000 Hounsfield units or less Written informed consent provided Willing and able to complete the assigned treatment and four-week follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Solitary functioning kidney Bilateral ureteric stones Active urinary tract infection Deranged renal function Stone maximum diameter of 10 mm or greater Stone density greater than 1000 Hounsfield units Unable or unwilling to complete the assigned treatment or four-week follow-up

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
Participants received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using the MODULITH SLX-F2 lithotripter. A maximum of three sessions was permitted, with an interval of at least 48 hours between sessions.
Procedimento: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
ESWL was performed using the MODULITH SLX-F2 lithotripter at 60-120 shocks per minute, an energy setting of 1-9 kV and approximately 2500-3000 shocks per session. Each session lasted approximately 30-60 minutes. Up to three sessions were permitted, with at least 48 hours between sessions.
Comparador Ativo: Semirigid Ureteroscopy
Participants underwent semirigid ureteroscopy under general anesthesia with pneumatic stone fragmentation. Stone fragments were removed when required, and a double-J ureteric stent was inserted in all participants.
Procedimento: Semirigid Ureteroscopy
Semirigid ureteroscopy was performed under general anesthesia using a 6.5-7.5 Fr ureteroscope. Stones were fragmented using the Swiss LithoClast Master pneumatic lithotripsy system with a 1-1.2 Fr probe. Fragments were removed using a Dormia basket or grasping forceps when required. A double-J ureteric stent was inserted in every participant and subsequently removed according to clinical assessment.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Complete Stone Clearance
Prazo: 4 weeks after completion of the assigned treatment
Number of participants with complete stone clearance on non-contrast computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder. Complete stone clearance was defined as the absence of any residual stone or stone fragment in the ipsilateral kidney or ureter. Participants requiring an additional stone-removal procedure before assessment were classified as treatment failures.
4 weeks after completion of the assigned treatment

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Number of ESWL Sessions Required
Prazo: Immediately after completion of the final ESWL treatment session
Number of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy sessions received by each participant assigned to the ESWL arm. Participants could receive a maximum of three sessions, with an interval of at least 48 hours between successive sessions.
Immediately after completion of the final ESWL treatment session

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Hanzla Arshad

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

1 de dezembro de 2025

Conclusão Primária (Real)

1 de junho de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

1 de junho de 2026

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

13 de agosto de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

18 de agosto de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

19 de agosto de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

19 de agosto de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

18 de agosto de 2026

Última verificação

1 de agosto de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Palavras-chave

Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • TERC/SC/INT/2025/570
  • Technical and Ethical Review C (Outro identificador: Shaikh Zayed Federal Postgraduate Medical Institute)

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

SIM

Descrição do plano IPD

Deidentified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the final publication will be available upon reasonable request. Data will be shared only after approval of a scientifically sound proposal and completion of a data-use agreement. Information that could identify individual participants will not be shared.

Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD

Beginning 3 months after publication of the study results and available for 5 years.

Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD

Researchers with a methodologically sound proposal may request access from the principal investigator. Requests must describe the research objectives, proposed analyses and data-security arrangements. Access will require approval by the principal investigator and completion of a data-use agreement. Data may be used only for the analyses specified in the approved proposal.

Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD

  • CIF

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever