Strong Kinesio Taping and Shoulder Performance (StrongKinesio)
22 août 2026 mis à jour par: Nazli Cigercioglu, Hacettepe University
Acute Effects of Strong Kinesio Taping on Shoulder Isokinetic Performance in Professional Basketball Players
This study evaluated the immediate effects of Strong Kinesio Taping on shoulder muscle performance in professional male basketball players. The study used a randomized crossover design in which each participant completed three experimental conditions: Strong Kinesio Taping, sham taping, and no taping. The testing sessions were separated by a 72-hour washout period.
During each session, the internal and external rotator muscle performance of the dominant shoulder was assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer at angular velocities of 60°/s and 240°/s. The main outcomes were peak torque and total work of the shoulder internal and external rotator muscles. The external-to-internal rotator strength ratio was also evaluated to determine whether taping affected the balance between these muscle groups.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Complété
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
This randomized, sham-controlled, repeated-measures crossover study was designed to investigate the immediate effects of Strong Kinesio Taping on shoulder isokinetic muscle performance in professional male basketball players. Each participant completed three experimental conditions in a randomized order: Strong Kinesio Taping, sham taping, and no taping. Consecutive testing sessions were separated by a 72-hour washout period to minimize possible carryover effects. Because each participant underwent all three conditions, participants served as their own controls.
Professional male basketball players who regularly participated in training and competition were assessed for eligibility. Participants were required to be free from shoulder pain or injury at the time of testing. Individuals with a history of shoulder surgery, neurological disorders, or musculoskeletal conditions affecting upper-extremity function were excluded. Before participation, all athletes received written and verbal information about the study procedures and provided written informed consent.
At each testing session, participants completed a standardized upper-extremity warm-up and familiarization contractions before the isokinetic assessment. Strong Kinesio Taping was applied to the dominant shoulder using a supraspinatus muscle inhibition technique and a glenohumeral mechanical correction technique. Sham taping was applied using the same tape material but without therapeutic tension or application principles intended to influence muscle function. In the no-taping condition, participants underwent the same testing procedures without tape application.
Shoulder internal and external rotator muscle performance was assessed using an isokinetic dynamometer. Participants were tested in a seated position with the shoulder at 90 degrees of abduction, the elbow at 90 degrees of flexion, and the forearm in a neutral position. The trunk and shoulder were stabilized, and the dynamometer axis was aligned with the axis of glenohumeral rotation.
Testing was performed at angular velocities of 60 degrees per second and 240 degrees per second. Participants completed five maximal repetitions at 60 degrees per second and 15 maximal repetitions at 240 degrees per second. A standardized rest period was provided between the two testing velocities.
The primary outcome measures were peak torque and total work of the shoulder internal and external rotator muscles at each angular velocity. The external-to-internal rotator strength ratio was evaluated as a secondary outcome to determine whether the taping conditions affected the relative balance between the shoulder rotator muscle groups.
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Réel)
26
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Kagithane
-
Istanbul, Kagithane, Turquie (Türkiye), 34408
- Atlas University
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
- Adulte
Accepte les volontaires sains
Oui
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- active participation in professional basketball competition,
- regular training participation
- absence of shoulder pain or injury at the time of testing.
Exclusion Criteria:
- a history of shoulder surgery,
- neurological disorders,
- any musculoskeletal condition affecting upper-extremity function
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Autre
- Répartition: Randomisé
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation croisée
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: Strong KT-Sham-No Taping Sequence
Participants received Strong Kinesio Taping during the first testing session, sham taping during the second testing session, and no taping during the third testing session.
Consecutive sessions were separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
A 5-cm-wide Strong Kinesio Tape was applied to the dominant shoulder by a certified Kinesio Taping practitioner.
The application included a supraspinatus muscle inhibition technique with approximately 10%-15% tape tension from insertion to origin and a glenohumeral mechanical correction technique with approximately 50%-75% tape tension from the anterior to the posterior aspect of the glenohumeral joint.
Shoulder isokinetic performance was assessed following the tape application.
The same tape material was applied to the dominant shoulder without therapeutic tension and without application principles intended to facilitate muscle activation or provide mechanical correction.
Participants subsequently underwent the same standardized isokinetic testing protocol.
No tape was applied to the dominant shoulder.
Participants completed the same standardized warm-up, familiarization, and isokinetic testing procedures used during the taping conditions.
|
|
Expérimental: Strong KT-No Taping-Sham Sequence
Participants received Strong Kinesio Taping during the first testing session, no taping during the second testing session, and sham taping during the third testing session.
Consecutive sessions were separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
A 5-cm-wide Strong Kinesio Tape was applied to the dominant shoulder by a certified Kinesio Taping practitioner.
The application included a supraspinatus muscle inhibition technique with approximately 10%-15% tape tension from insertion to origin and a glenohumeral mechanical correction technique with approximately 50%-75% tape tension from the anterior to the posterior aspect of the glenohumeral joint.
Shoulder isokinetic performance was assessed following the tape application.
The same tape material was applied to the dominant shoulder without therapeutic tension and without application principles intended to facilitate muscle activation or provide mechanical correction.
Participants subsequently underwent the same standardized isokinetic testing protocol.
No tape was applied to the dominant shoulder.
Participants completed the same standardized warm-up, familiarization, and isokinetic testing procedures used during the taping conditions.
|
|
Expérimental: Sham-Strong KT-No Taping Sequence
Participants received sham taping during the first testing session, Strong Kinesio Taping during the second testing session, and no taping during the third testing session.
Consecutive sessions were separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
A 5-cm-wide Strong Kinesio Tape was applied to the dominant shoulder by a certified Kinesio Taping practitioner.
The application included a supraspinatus muscle inhibition technique with approximately 10%-15% tape tension from insertion to origin and a glenohumeral mechanical correction technique with approximately 50%-75% tape tension from the anterior to the posterior aspect of the glenohumeral joint.
Shoulder isokinetic performance was assessed following the tape application.
The same tape material was applied to the dominant shoulder without therapeutic tension and without application principles intended to facilitate muscle activation or provide mechanical correction.
Participants subsequently underwent the same standardized isokinetic testing protocol.
No tape was applied to the dominant shoulder.
Participants completed the same standardized warm-up, familiarization, and isokinetic testing procedures used during the taping conditions.
|
|
Expérimental: Sham-No Taping-Strong KT Sequence
Participants received sham taping during the first testing session, no taping during the second testing session, and Strong Kinesio Taping during the third testing session.
Consecutive sessions were separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
A 5-cm-wide Strong Kinesio Tape was applied to the dominant shoulder by a certified Kinesio Taping practitioner.
The application included a supraspinatus muscle inhibition technique with approximately 10%-15% tape tension from insertion to origin and a glenohumeral mechanical correction technique with approximately 50%-75% tape tension from the anterior to the posterior aspect of the glenohumeral joint.
Shoulder isokinetic performance was assessed following the tape application.
The same tape material was applied to the dominant shoulder without therapeutic tension and without application principles intended to facilitate muscle activation or provide mechanical correction.
Participants subsequently underwent the same standardized isokinetic testing protocol.
No tape was applied to the dominant shoulder.
Participants completed the same standardized warm-up, familiarization, and isokinetic testing procedures used during the taping conditions.
|
|
Expérimental: No Taping-Strong KT-Sham Sequence
Participants received no taping during the first testing session, Strong Kinesio Taping during the second testing session, and sham taping during the third testing session.
Consecutive sessions were separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
A 5-cm-wide Strong Kinesio Tape was applied to the dominant shoulder by a certified Kinesio Taping practitioner.
The application included a supraspinatus muscle inhibition technique with approximately 10%-15% tape tension from insertion to origin and a glenohumeral mechanical correction technique with approximately 50%-75% tape tension from the anterior to the posterior aspect of the glenohumeral joint.
Shoulder isokinetic performance was assessed following the tape application.
The same tape material was applied to the dominant shoulder without therapeutic tension and without application principles intended to facilitate muscle activation or provide mechanical correction.
Participants subsequently underwent the same standardized isokinetic testing protocol.
No tape was applied to the dominant shoulder.
Participants completed the same standardized warm-up, familiarization, and isokinetic testing procedures used during the taping conditions.
|
|
Expérimental: No Taping-Sham-Strong KT Sequence
Participants received no taping during the first testing session, sham taping during the second testing session, and Strong Kinesio Taping during the third testing session.
Consecutive sessions were separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
A 5-cm-wide Strong Kinesio Tape was applied to the dominant shoulder by a certified Kinesio Taping practitioner.
The application included a supraspinatus muscle inhibition technique with approximately 10%-15% tape tension from insertion to origin and a glenohumeral mechanical correction technique with approximately 50%-75% tape tension from the anterior to the posterior aspect of the glenohumeral joint.
Shoulder isokinetic performance was assessed following the tape application.
The same tape material was applied to the dominant shoulder without therapeutic tension and without application principles intended to facilitate muscle activation or provide mechanical correction.
Participants subsequently underwent the same standardized isokinetic testing protocol.
No tape was applied to the dominant shoulder.
Participants completed the same standardized warm-up, familiarization, and isokinetic testing procedures used during the taping conditions.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
External Rotator Peak Torque at 60°/s
Délai: Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
Peak torque of the dominant shoulder external rotator muscles was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer at an angular velocity of 60°/s.
Peak torque was recorded in Newton-meters (Nm).
Higher values indicate greater maximal external rotator muscle strength.
|
Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
|
Internal Rotator Peak Torque at 60°/s
Délai: Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
Peak torque of the dominant shoulder internal rotator muscles was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer at an angular velocity of 60°/s.
Peak torque was recorded in Newton-meters (Nm).
Higher values indicate greater maximal internal rotator muscle strength.
|
Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
|
External Rotator Total Work at 60°/s
Délai: Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
Total work performed by the dominant shoulder external rotator muscles across five maximal repetitions was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer at an angular velocity of 60°/s.
Total work was recorded in joules (J).
Higher values indicate greater cumulative external rotator work.
|
Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
|
Internal Rotator Total Work at 60°/s
Délai: Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
Total work performed by the dominant shoulder internal rotator muscles across five maximal repetitions was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer at an angular velocity of 60°/s.
Total work was recorded in joules (J).
Higher values indicate greater cumulative internal rotator work.
|
Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
|
External Rotator Peak Torque at 240°/s
Délai: Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
Peak torque of the dominant shoulder external rotator muscles was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer at an angular velocity of 240°/s.
Peak torque was recorded in Newton-meters (Nm).
Higher values indicate greater maximal external rotator muscle performance at high angular velocity.
|
Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
|
Internal Rotator Peak Torque at 240°/s
Délai: Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
Peak torque of the dominant shoulder internal rotator muscles was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer at an angular velocity of 240°/s.
Peak torque was recorded in Newton-meters (Nm).
Higher values indicate greater maximal internal rotator muscle performance at high angular velocity.
|
Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
|
External Rotator Total Work at 240°/s
Délai: Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
Total work performed by the dominant shoulder external rotator muscles across 15 maximal repetitions was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer at an angular velocity of 240°/s.
Total work was recorded in joules (J).
Higher values indicate greater cumulative external rotator work.
|
Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
|
Internal Rotator Total Work at 240°/s
Délai: Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
Total work performed by the dominant shoulder internal rotator muscles across 15 maximal repetitions was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer at an angular velocity of 240°/s.
Total work was recorded in joules (J).
Higher values indicate greater cumulative internal rotator work.
|
Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
External-to-Internal Rotator Peak Torque Ratio at 60°/s
Délai: Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
The conventional external-to-internal rotator strength ratio of the dominant shoulder was calculated by dividing external rotator peak torque by internal rotator peak torque and multiplying the result by 100.
The ratio was expressed as a percentage (%).
It represents the relative strength balance between the shoulder external and internal rotator muscles; higher values do not necessarily indicate a better outcome.
|
Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
|
External-to-Internal Rotator Peak Torque Ratio at 240°/s
Délai: Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
The conventional external-to-internal rotator strength ratio of the dominant shoulder was calculated by dividing external rotator peak torque by internal rotator peak torque and multiplying the result by 100.
The ratio was expressed as a percentage (%).
It represents the relative strength balance between the shoulder external and internal rotator muscles; higher values do not necessarily indicate a better outcome.
|
Immediately following each experimental condition during each of the three testing sessions, with sessions separated by a 72-hour washout period.
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
1 janvier 2026
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
1 avril 2026
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
1 août 2026
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
22 août 2026
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
22 août 2026
Première publication (Réel)
26 août 2026
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
26 août 2026
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
22 août 2026
Dernière vérification
1 août 2026
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- Strong kinesio isokinetic
- Selcuk University (Identificateur de registre: Selcuk University)
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
NON
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .