Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Active Engagement Game Versus Passive Media During Pediatric Inhalational Induction

26 août 2026 mis à jour par: Yick Man Jasmin Tong, Hong Kong Children's Hospital

Active Engagement Game Versus Passive Media During Pediatric Inhalational Induction: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether an active, breath-controlled iPad/phone game can reduce the need for physical restraint during mask-based anesthesia induction in children undergoing surgery.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Does an active-engagement game reduce the need for physical restraint during mask induction, compared with standard passive media distraction (such as watching cartoons)?

Investigators will compare children who use the new interactive game to children who receive standard passive audiovisual distraction, to see if the active game lowers rates of physical restraint during induction.

Participants will:

Play an interactive game on an iPad or phone while awake, before anesthesia begins, controlling it themselves.

Continue "playing" once the anesthesia mask is placed over their face, at which point the anesthesiologist takes over the controls using a phone remote.

Have the game synced to their own natural breathing pattern, so the visuals on the screen move in time with each breath, giving them a sense of active control without needing to physically touch the device.

Be compared to a group of children who instead watch passive video content (cartoons or similar) during induction, following standard care.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

Preoperative anxiety is a highly prevalent complication in pediatric anesthesia, occurring in up to 50-60% of children undergoing surgery. High anxiety during the induction of anesthesia-particularly during the application of the face mask-is strongly correlated with poor induction compliance, increased risk of emergence delirium, higher postoperative analgesic requirements, and long-term negative behavioral changes.

To mitigate these risks, non-pharmacological behavioral interventions are widely integrated into routine pediatric perioperative care. While tablet-based audiovisual distraction (e.g., watching cartoons or playing games) has been shown to be a safe and effective alternative to pharmacological premedication, it is fundamentally limited by the physical realities of inhalational induction. Specifically, once the anesthesia mask is applied, children lose the physical ability to interact with standard digital games. Consequently, active distraction strategies frequently revert to passive observation at the exact moment when the child experiences the highest sensory distress.

Emerging evidence suggests that active cognitive engagement is superior to passive observation for sustained anxiolysis. However, there is a lack of specialized active distraction tools that safely integrate with the hands-on airway management workflow of the anesthesiologist. To address this gap, the investigators developed a novel, two-phase interactive iPad/phone game. During the awake pre-induction phase, the child interacts directly with the screen. As the anesthesia mask is applied, control of the game seamlessly transfers to a phone remote operated by the anesthesiologist. The anesthesiologist synchronizes the remote to the child's spontaneous respiratory rate, providing the child with active, breath-driven visual feedback on the iPad/phone screen without requiring their physical interaction.

The primary objective of this pragmatic randomized controlled trial is to determine whether this breath-synchronized active engagement game reduces the need for physical restraint during pediatric mask induction compared to standard passive media distraction.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

128

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

  • Nom: Jasmin YM Tong, FHKCA, FHKAM, FRCPC (Anes)
  • Numéro de téléphone: +852 35133760
  • E-mail: tym651@ha.org.hk

Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude

  • Nom: Vivian Yuen, FHKCA, FHKAM
  • Numéro de téléphone: +852 35133752
  • E-mail: yuenmyv@ha.org.hk

Lieux d'étude

      • Hong Kong, Chine
        • Hong Kong Children's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Vivian Yuen, FHKCA, FHKAM
          • Numéro de téléphone: +852 35133752
          • E-mail: yuenmyv@ha.org.hk
        • Contact:
          • Jasmin YM Tong, FHKCA, FHKAM, FRCPC
          • Numéro de téléphone: +852 35133760
          • E-mail: tym651@ha.org.hk
        • Chercheur principal:
          • Jasmin YM Tong, FHKCA, FHKAM, FRCPC

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 3 to 8 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II
  • Elective surgery or sedation requiring general anesthesia
  • Planned mask (inhalational) induction
  • Assessed by the attending anesthesiologist as sufficiently calm and cooperative to participate without pharmacological premedication for anxiolysis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receipt of pharmacological premedication for anxiolysis (e.g., intranasal dexmedetomidine, oral midazolam)
  • Developmental, cognitive, or communication impairment severe enough to preclude engagement with the interactive game or understanding of instructions
  • Profound visual or hearing impairment that would prevent participation in the game or usual care distraction
  • Any clinical airway scenario in which the attending anesthesiologist determines that study participation poses a safety risk

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Autre
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Autre: 3-5 years
patients of 3-5 years
Interactive balloon game
Passive media
Autre: 6-8 years
older children
Interactive balloon game
Passive media

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Physical restraint
Délai: Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min
Yes or No
Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min
Degree of physical restraint
Délai: Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min

4 point pragmatic clinical scale: 0 = No restraint: The patient is cooperative or requires only verbal guidance; no physical holding is needed to apply the mask

  1. = Mild restraint: Gentle holding of the child's hands or arms (usually by one person) to prevent interference with the mask, accompanied by minimal physical resistance from the child.
  2. = Moderate restraint: Firm holding of the limbs and/or torso by one or two individuals due to active physical resistance or attempts to sit up.
  3. = Severe restraint: Forceful holding of multiple body parts, including the head or full torso, often requiring multiple clinical staff and/or parents/legal guardians due to vigorous struggling, flailing, or combative behavior.
Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Induction compliance
Délai: Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min
Measured by the Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC) during mask application. The Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC) is an 11-item behavioral observation scale used to assess a child's reaction to the face mask during anesthesia induction. Each item corresponds to a specific mask-rejecting behavior, and the total score ranges from 0 to 10. A score of 0 indicates full cooperation with no mask-rejecting behavior, while a score of 10 represents the most severe rejection response. Higher ICC scores reflect greater resistance to the surgical mask during induction. Per the scale's originators, a total score of ≥6 is classified as indicating traumatic anesthesia induction.
Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min
Caregiver satisfaction and acceptability
Délai: Within 24hrs after anesthetic induction, during PACU stay
Caregiver satisfaction and acceptability regarding the anesthetic induction will be assessed using a questionnaire comprising a series of statements, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Within 24hrs after anesthetic induction, during PACU stay
Child self-reported acceptability
Délai: Within 24 hours after anesthetic induction, during PACU stay or, if the child remains sleepy, on the ward
Patient satisfaction with the anesthetic induction will be assessed using an age-appropriate visual smiley-face scale, ranging from 1 (☹️, very unsatisfied) to 5 (?, very satisfied).The child's level of fear during the anesthetic induction will also be assessed using an age-appropriate visual smiley-face scale, ranging from 1 (?,, very scared) to 5 (?, very calm).
Within 24 hours after anesthetic induction, during PACU stay or, if the child remains sleepy, on the ward

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Jasmin YM Tong, FHKCA, FHKAM, FRCPC, Hong Kong Children's Hospital

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 septembre 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

31 décembre 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

28 février 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

18 août 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

21 août 2026

Première publication (Réel)

26 août 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

31 août 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

26 août 2026

Dernière vérification

1 août 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • Breatheballoon

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner