Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Active Engagement Game Versus Passive Media During Pediatric Inhalational Induction

26 de agosto de 2026 atualizado por: Yick Man Jasmin Tong, Hong Kong Children's Hospital

Active Engagement Game Versus Passive Media During Pediatric Inhalational Induction: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether an active, breath-controlled iPad/phone game can reduce the need for physical restraint during mask-based anesthesia induction in children undergoing surgery.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Does an active-engagement game reduce the need for physical restraint during mask induction, compared with standard passive media distraction (such as watching cartoons)?

Investigators will compare children who use the new interactive game to children who receive standard passive audiovisual distraction, to see if the active game lowers rates of physical restraint during induction.

Participants will:

Play an interactive game on an iPad or phone while awake, before anesthesia begins, controlling it themselves.

Continue "playing" once the anesthesia mask is placed over their face, at which point the anesthesiologist takes over the controls using a phone remote.

Have the game synced to their own natural breathing pattern, so the visuals on the screen move in time with each breath, giving them a sense of active control without needing to physically touch the device.

Be compared to a group of children who instead watch passive video content (cartoons or similar) during induction, following standard care.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Ainda não está recrutando

Intervenção / Tratamento

Descrição detalhada

Preoperative anxiety is a highly prevalent complication in pediatric anesthesia, occurring in up to 50-60% of children undergoing surgery. High anxiety during the induction of anesthesia-particularly during the application of the face mask-is strongly correlated with poor induction compliance, increased risk of emergence delirium, higher postoperative analgesic requirements, and long-term negative behavioral changes.

To mitigate these risks, non-pharmacological behavioral interventions are widely integrated into routine pediatric perioperative care. While tablet-based audiovisual distraction (e.g., watching cartoons or playing games) has been shown to be a safe and effective alternative to pharmacological premedication, it is fundamentally limited by the physical realities of inhalational induction. Specifically, once the anesthesia mask is applied, children lose the physical ability to interact with standard digital games. Consequently, active distraction strategies frequently revert to passive observation at the exact moment when the child experiences the highest sensory distress.

Emerging evidence suggests that active cognitive engagement is superior to passive observation for sustained anxiolysis. However, there is a lack of specialized active distraction tools that safely integrate with the hands-on airway management workflow of the anesthesiologist. To address this gap, the investigators developed a novel, two-phase interactive iPad/phone game. During the awake pre-induction phase, the child interacts directly with the screen. As the anesthesia mask is applied, control of the game seamlessly transfers to a phone remote operated by the anesthesiologist. The anesthesiologist synchronizes the remote to the child's spontaneous respiratory rate, providing the child with active, breath-driven visual feedback on the iPad/phone screen without requiring their physical interaction.

The primary objective of this pragmatic randomized controlled trial is to determine whether this breath-synchronized active engagement game reduces the need for physical restraint during pediatric mask induction compared to standard passive media distraction.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

128

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

  • Nome: Jasmin YM Tong, FHKCA, FHKAM, FRCPC (Anes)
  • Número de telefone: +852 35133760
  • E-mail: tym651@ha.org.hk

Estude backup de contato

  • Nome: Vivian Yuen, FHKCA, FHKAM
  • Número de telefone: +852 35133752
  • E-mail: yuenmyv@ha.org.hk

Locais de estudo

      • Hong Kong, China
        • Hong Kong Children's Hospital
        • Contato:
          • Vivian Yuen, FHKCA, FHKAM
          • Número de telefone: +852 35133752
          • E-mail: yuenmyv@ha.org.hk
        • Contato:
          • Jasmin YM Tong, FHKCA, FHKAM, FRCPC
          • Número de telefone: +852 35133760
          • E-mail: tym651@ha.org.hk
        • Investigador principal:
          • Jasmin YM Tong, FHKCA, FHKAM, FRCPC

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Filho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 3 to 8 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II
  • Elective surgery or sedation requiring general anesthesia
  • Planned mask (inhalational) induction
  • Assessed by the attending anesthesiologist as sufficiently calm and cooperative to participate without pharmacological premedication for anxiolysis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receipt of pharmacological premedication for anxiolysis (e.g., intranasal dexmedetomidine, oral midazolam)
  • Developmental, cognitive, or communication impairment severe enough to preclude engagement with the interactive game or understanding of instructions
  • Profound visual or hearing impairment that would prevent participation in the game or usual care distraction
  • Any clinical airway scenario in which the attending anesthesiologist determines that study participation poses a safety risk

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Outro
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Outro: 3-5 years
patients of 3-5 years
Interactive balloon game
Passive media
Outro: 6-8 years
older children
Interactive balloon game
Passive media

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Physical restraint
Prazo: Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min
Yes or No
Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min
Degree of physical restraint
Prazo: Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min

4 point pragmatic clinical scale: 0 = No restraint: The patient is cooperative or requires only verbal guidance; no physical holding is needed to apply the mask

  1. = Mild restraint: Gentle holding of the child's hands or arms (usually by one person) to prevent interference with the mask, accompanied by minimal physical resistance from the child.
  2. = Moderate restraint: Firm holding of the limbs and/or torso by one or two individuals due to active physical resistance or attempts to sit up.
  3. = Severe restraint: Forceful holding of multiple body parts, including the head or full torso, often requiring multiple clinical staff and/or parents/legal guardians due to vigorous struggling, flailing, or combative behavior.
Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Induction compliance
Prazo: Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min
Measured by the Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC) during mask application. The Induction Compliance Checklist (ICC) is an 11-item behavioral observation scale used to assess a child's reaction to the face mask during anesthesia induction. Each item corresponds to a specific mask-rejecting behavior, and the total score ranges from 0 to 10. A score of 0 indicates full cooperation with no mask-rejecting behavior, while a score of 10 represents the most severe rejection response. Higher ICC scores reflect greater resistance to the surgical mask during induction. Per the scale's originators, a total score of ≥6 is classified as indicating traumatic anesthesia induction.
Perioperative/from anesthetic induction up to 15min
Caregiver satisfaction and acceptability
Prazo: Within 24hrs after anesthetic induction, during PACU stay
Caregiver satisfaction and acceptability regarding the anesthetic induction will be assessed using a questionnaire comprising a series of statements, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Within 24hrs after anesthetic induction, during PACU stay
Child self-reported acceptability
Prazo: Within 24 hours after anesthetic induction, during PACU stay or, if the child remains sleepy, on the ward
Patient satisfaction with the anesthetic induction will be assessed using an age-appropriate visual smiley-face scale, ranging from 1 (☹️, very unsatisfied) to 5 (?, very satisfied).The child's level of fear during the anesthetic induction will also be assessed using an age-appropriate visual smiley-face scale, ranging from 1 (?,, very scared) to 5 (?, very calm).
Within 24 hours after anesthetic induction, during PACU stay or, if the child remains sleepy, on the ward

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Jasmin YM Tong, FHKCA, FHKAM, FRCPC, Hong Kong Children's Hospital

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de setembro de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

31 de dezembro de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

28 de fevereiro de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

18 de agosto de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

21 de agosto de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

26 de agosto de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

31 de agosto de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

26 de agosto de 2026

Última verificação

1 de agosto de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • Breatheballoon

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever