Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Using a Primary Care- Based Stepped-Care Model of Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (PSC-TF-CBT)to Reduce Trauma Symptoms and Negative Mental Health Sequelae

27 août 2026 mis à jour par: Funlola Are, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Using a Primary Care- Based Stepped-Care Model of Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Reduce Trauma Symptoms and Negative Mental Health Sequelae

The purpose of this study is to evaluating the feasibility of delivering a trauma-focused intervention among children with elevated traumatic stress symptoms in primary care

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Les conditions

Intervention / Traitement

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

30

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Sauvegarde des contacts de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Enfant

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • able to read or understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently receiving mental health treatment elsewhere

  • Clinical exclusion criteria:

    1. Evidence of active suicidality
    2. Presence of psychotic symptoms

Severe psychiatric or posttraumatic symptom impairment requiring immediate mental health treatment or hospitalization, defined as:

  1. Score ≥ 40 on the child-report measure, or
  2. Score ≥ 42 on the caregiver-report measure -Cognitive or comprehension difficulties that would prevent the child or caregiver from completing study assessments

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: La prévention
  • Répartition: N / A
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: PSC-TF-CBT
Comportemental: PSC-TF-CBT
The intervention is a stepped-care adaptation of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (PSC-TF-CBT) delivered within pediatric primary care. Treatment intensity is matched to each participant's individual clinical needs, with participants receiving lower-intensity intervention components initially and progressing to more intensive trauma-focused treatment as clinically indicated. PSC-TF-CBT incorporates trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy strategies for youth and includes caregiver involvement.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants recruited
Délai: From baseline to end of study (30 weeks form baseline)
From baseline to end of study (30 weeks form baseline)
Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants enrolled in the study
Délai: end of study (30 weeks form baseline)
end of study (30 weeks form baseline)
Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants retained in the study
Délai: end of study (30 weeks form baseline)
Retained is described as participants who enroll in the study and remain enrolled through the study endpoint/final.
end of study (30 weeks form baseline)
Feasibility as assessed by the proportion of scheduled intervention sessions attended by each participant
Délai: From baseline to end of study (30 weeks form baseline)
From baseline to end of study (30 weeks form baseline)
Feasibility as assessed by number of participants that completed the intervention
Délai: end of study (30 weeks from baseline)
end of study (30 weeks from baseline)
Change in acceptability by youth as assessed by participant satisfaction questionnaires
Délai: 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Satisfaction will be assessed using a 10-item questionnaire. Participants will respond to each item with either "Agree" or "Disagree." The total number of "Agree" responses will be calculated, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 10. A higher number of "Agree" responses indicates greater satisfaction.
6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Change in acceptability by caregiver as assessed by participant satisfaction questionnaires
Délai: 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 13 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(very dissatisfied) to 7 (Very satisfied) for a score range of 13-91, higher scores indicating better outcome
6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Change in acceptability of the intervention by the youth as assessed by qualitative exit interviews
Délai: 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 11 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree) for a maximum score range of 11-55, higher scores indicating better outcome
6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Change in acceptability of the intervention by the caregiver as assessed by qualitative exit interviews
Délai: 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 11 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree) for a maximum score range of 11-55, higher scores indicating better outcome
6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Child traumatic stress symptoms as assessed by the Child Trauma Screen (CTS)
Délai: Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)

This is a 10 item questionnaire divided into 2 components:

Four items assess exposure to potentially traumatic events using a yes/no response format, and six items assess PTSD-related reactions using a 4-point response scale scored from 0 to 3. The six reaction items are summed to produce a Reactions Total score ranging from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater traumatic stress symptom severity. A Reactions Total score of ≥6 indicates a high likelihood of clinically significant PTSD symptoms
Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Change in youth anxiety symptoms as assessed by the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS)(child's self-report)
Délai: Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 47 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0 (Never) to 3 (Always) for a maximum score range of 0-141, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms
Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Change in youth anxiety symptoms as assessed by the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS), (parent report )
Délai: Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 47 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0 (Never) to 3 (Always) for a maximum score range of 0-141, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms
Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Change in youth depressive symptoms as assessed by the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) (child's self-report)
Délai: Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 47 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0 (Never) to 3 (Always) for a maximum score range of 0-141, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms
Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Change in youth depressive symptoms as assessed by the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) (parent report)
Délai: Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 47 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0 (Never) to 3 (Always) for a maximum score range of 0-141, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms
Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Change in emotional and behavioral problems as assessed by the Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 (PSC-17)
Délai: Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
The Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 (PSC-17) is a 17-item screening measure of psychosocial, emotional, and behavioral problems in children and adolescents. Each item is rated on a 3-point scale from 0 (Never) to 2 (Often). Item scores are summed to generate a Total Problems Score, ranging from 0 to 34, with higher scores indicating greater emotional and behavioral difficulties.
Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Intervention Appropriateness as assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Délai: 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 4-item implementation outcome measure rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Completely disagree) to 5 (Completely agree). Scores will be calculated by averaging item responses , with higher scores indicating greater perceived appropriateness.
6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Change in acceptability as assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Délai: 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Completely disagree) to 5 (Completely agree). The four item scores are averaged to generate an overall AIM score ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater perceived acceptability of the intervention.
6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Feasibility as assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM).
Délai: 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Completely disagree) to 5 (Completely agree) for a maximum score range of 1-20,with higher scores indicating greater perceived feasibility of the intervention.
6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Collaborateurs

The Texas Child Mental Health Care Consortium (TCMHCC)

Les enquêteurs

  • Directeur d'études: Funlola G Are, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

31 août 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 juillet 2027

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 août 2027

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

27 août 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

27 août 2026

Première publication (Réel)

1 septembre 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

1 septembre 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

27 août 2026

Dernière vérification

1 août 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Mots clés

Termes MeSH pertinents supplémentaires

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • HSC-MS-26-0466

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner