Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Using a Primary Care- Based Stepped-Care Model of Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (PSC-TF-CBT)to Reduce Trauma Symptoms and Negative Mental Health Sequelae

27 agosto 2026 aggiornato da: Funlola Are, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Using a Primary Care- Based Stepped-Care Model of Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Reduce Trauma Symptoms and Negative Mental Health Sequelae

The purpose of this study is to evaluating the feasibility of delivering a trauma-focused intervention among children with elevated traumatic stress symptoms in primary care

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Non ancora reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

30

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Backup dei contatti dello studio

Luoghi di studio

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Bambino

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • able to read or understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently receiving mental health treatment elsewhere

  • Clinical exclusion criteria:

    1. Evidence of active suicidality
    2. Presence of psychotic symptoms

Severe psychiatric or posttraumatic symptom impairment requiring immediate mental health treatment or hospitalization, defined as:

  1. Score ≥ 40 on the child-report measure, or
  2. Score ≥ 42 on the caregiver-report measure -Cognitive or comprehension difficulties that would prevent the child or caregiver from completing study assessments

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Prevenzione
  • Assegnazione: N / A
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: PSC-TF-CBT
Comportamentale: PSC-TF-CBT
The intervention is a stepped-care adaptation of Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (PSC-TF-CBT) delivered within pediatric primary care. Treatment intensity is matched to each participant's individual clinical needs, with participants receiving lower-intensity intervention components initially and progressing to more intensive trauma-focused treatment as clinically indicated. PSC-TF-CBT incorporates trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy strategies for youth and includes caregiver involvement.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants recruited
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to end of study (30 weeks form baseline)
From baseline to end of study (30 weeks form baseline)
Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants enrolled in the study
Lasso di tempo: end of study (30 weeks form baseline)
end of study (30 weeks form baseline)
Feasibility as assessed by the number of participants retained in the study
Lasso di tempo: end of study (30 weeks form baseline)
Retained is described as participants who enroll in the study and remain enrolled through the study endpoint/final.
end of study (30 weeks form baseline)
Feasibility as assessed by the proportion of scheduled intervention sessions attended by each participant
Lasso di tempo: From baseline to end of study (30 weeks form baseline)
From baseline to end of study (30 weeks form baseline)
Feasibility as assessed by number of participants that completed the intervention
Lasso di tempo: end of study (30 weeks from baseline)
end of study (30 weeks from baseline)
Change in acceptability by youth as assessed by participant satisfaction questionnaires
Lasso di tempo: 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Satisfaction will be assessed using a 10-item questionnaire. Participants will respond to each item with either "Agree" or "Disagree." The total number of "Agree" responses will be calculated, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 10. A higher number of "Agree" responses indicates greater satisfaction.
6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Change in acceptability by caregiver as assessed by participant satisfaction questionnaires
Lasso di tempo: 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 13 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1(very dissatisfied) to 7 (Very satisfied) for a score range of 13-91, higher scores indicating better outcome
6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Change in acceptability of the intervention by the youth as assessed by qualitative exit interviews
Lasso di tempo: 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 11 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree) for a maximum score range of 11-55, higher scores indicating better outcome
6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Change in acceptability of the intervention by the caregiver as assessed by qualitative exit interviews
Lasso di tempo: 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 11 item questionnaire and each is scored from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree) for a maximum score range of 11-55, higher scores indicating better outcome
6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Child traumatic stress symptoms as assessed by the Child Trauma Screen (CTS)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)

This is a 10 item questionnaire divided into 2 components:

Four items assess exposure to potentially traumatic events using a yes/no response format, and six items assess PTSD-related reactions using a 4-point response scale scored from 0 to 3. The six reaction items are summed to produce a Reactions Total score ranging from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater traumatic stress symptom severity. A Reactions Total score of ≥6 indicates a high likelihood of clinically significant PTSD symptoms
Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Change in youth anxiety symptoms as assessed by the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS)(child's self-report)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 47 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0 (Never) to 3 (Always) for a maximum score range of 0-141, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms
Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Change in youth anxiety symptoms as assessed by the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS), (parent report )
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 47 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0 (Never) to 3 (Always) for a maximum score range of 0-141, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms
Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Change in youth depressive symptoms as assessed by the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) (child's self-report)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 47 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0 (Never) to 3 (Always) for a maximum score range of 0-141, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms
Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Change in youth depressive symptoms as assessed by the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS) (parent report)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 47 item questionnaire and each is scored from 0 (Never) to 3 (Always) for a maximum score range of 0-141, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms
Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Change in emotional and behavioral problems as assessed by the Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 (PSC-17)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
The Pediatric Symptom Checklist-17 (PSC-17) is a 17-item screening measure of psychosocial, emotional, and behavioral problems in children and adolescents. Each item is rated on a 3-point scale from 0 (Never) to 2 (Often). Item scores are summed to generate a Total Problems Score, ranging from 0 to 34, with higher scores indicating greater emotional and behavioral difficulties.
Baseline, 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Intervention Appropriateness as assessed by the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Lasso di tempo: 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 4-item implementation outcome measure rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Completely disagree) to 5 (Completely agree). Scores will be calculated by averaging item responses , with higher scores indicating greater perceived appropriateness.
6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Change in acceptability as assessed by the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Lasso di tempo: 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Completely disagree) to 5 (Completely agree). The four item scores are averaged to generate an overall AIM score ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater perceived acceptability of the intervention.
6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
Feasibility as assessed by the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM).
Lasso di tempo: 6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)
This is a 4 item questionnaire and each is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Completely disagree) to 5 (Completely agree) for a maximum score range of 1-20,with higher scores indicating greater perceived feasibility of the intervention.
6 weeks after baseline (Step 2), 6-12 weeks after Step 2 (Step 3), 6-12 weeks after Step 3 (Step 4)

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Collaboratori

The Texas Child Mental Health Care Consortium (TCMHCC)

Investigatori

  • Direttore dello studio: Funlola G Are, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

31 agosto 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 luglio 2027

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 agosto 2027

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

27 agosto 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

27 agosto 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

1 settembre 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

1 settembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

27 agosto 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 agosto 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Parole chiave

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • HSC-MS-26-0466

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi