Increasing Children's Defending Behaviors: Using Deviance Regulation
2020. december 18. frissítette: Wendy P. Gordon, Auburn University
The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) has identified bullying as a significant public health concern.
The research tests a novel approach to increase children's defending of victims of bullying.
Previous research has shown that the presence of defenders leads to decreases in bullying.
Thus, promoting defending has become a critical component of anti-bullying interventions.
However, how to best motivate defending has been relatively unstudied.
Deviance Regulation Theory (DRT) provides a theoretical basis for motivating positive health and social behaviors.
This theory proposes that individuals are motivated to behave in ways that differentiate them from others in a positive manner.
Accordingly, individuals will be motivated to engage in a behavior if they believe the behavior occurs infrequently and will be viewed positively by others.
As children report that few of their peers defend victims of bullying, the goal of this study is to increase defending by communicating to children that defenders possess traits valued by their peers (e.g., being popular, kind).
Children in 4th-grade and 5th-grade classrooms received a DRT-based anti-bullying intervention or an anti-bullying intervention focused on increasing empathy for victims and strategies for defending peers.
Data collection occurred three times during the school year: a) at baseline, two weeks prior to the intervention; b) 3 months post-intervention; and c) 6 months post-intervention.
Findings showed that compared to the traditional anti-bullying intervention, the DRT-based intervention resulted in larger, more sustained gains in teacher-reported defending, but not peer-reported or self-reported defending.
Contrary to expectations, gains in teacher-reported defending were greatest for children who viewed defending to be normative amongst their classmates.
Increases in defending were also greatest among those children least likely to defend (i.e., those low in popularity and prosocial behavior, and those often bullied by peer).
These findings have implications for the development of anti-bullying interventions and more broadly for understanding how to encourage important behavioral changes in childhood and adolescence.
However, more research is needed to understand why increases were limited to only defending behaviors observable to teachers.
A tanulmány áttekintése
Állapot
Befejezve
Körülmények
Beavatkozás / kezelés
Részletes leírás
This study, conducted over the 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 school years examined whether a DRT-based intervention activity resulted in greater increases in defending behaviors in response to witnessed bullying than a more traditional, empathy-based activity.
Thirteen schools were randomly assigned to receive either the DRT-based or empathy-based activity, and all fourth-grade and fifth-grade children were invited to participate.
Defending behaviors were assessed approximately two weeks prior to participation in the activity and at three-month and six-month follow-ups.
Data collected included peer-reports, teacher-reports, and self-reports.
Also examined was whether popularity, peer acceptance, prosocial behavior, peer victimization, empathy, self-efficacy for defending, moral disengagement, or gender moderated intervention effects.
Tanulmány típusa
Beavatkozó
Beiratkozás (Tényleges)
1564
Fázis
- Nem alkalmazható
Kapcsolatok és helyek
Ez a rész a vizsgálatot végzők elérhetőségeit, valamint a vizsgálat lefolytatásának helyére vonatkozó információkat tartalmazza.
Tanulmányi helyek
-
-
Alabama
-
Auburn, Alabama, Egyesült Államok, 36879-5402
- Auburn University
-
-
Részvételi kritériumok
A kutatók olyan embereket keresnek, akik megfelelnek egy bizonyos leírásnak, az úgynevezett jogosultsági kritériumoknak. Néhány példa ezekre a kritériumokra a személy általános egészségi állapota vagy a korábbi kezelések.
Jogosultsági kritériumok
Tanulmányozható életkorok
- Gyermek
- Felnőtt
- Idősebb felnőtt
Egészséges önkénteseket fogad
Nem
Tanulmányozható nemek
Összes
Leírás
Inclusion Criteria:
- Child in the fourth-grade or fifth-grade of participating schools
Exclusion Criteria:
- None.
Tanulási terv
Ez a rész a vizsgálati terv részleteit tartalmazza, beleértve a vizsgálat megtervezését és a vizsgálat mérését.
Hogyan készül a tanulmány?
Tervezési részletek
- Elsődleges cél: Alapvető tudomány
- Kiosztás: Véletlenszerűsített
- Beavatkozó modell: Párhuzamos hozzárendelés
- Maszkolás: Kettős
Fegyverek és beavatkozások
Résztvevő csoport / kar |
Beavatkozás / kezelés |
|---|---|
|
Kísérleti: DRT-Condition
This is the experimental group that engaged in the DRT-based intervention activity.
|
Children were asked to provide five descriptors of two children who each engaged in defending behaviors.
Two weeks later they were told the top seven descriptors given by the hundreds of children participating in the project.
This was followed by a brief discussion of how one could best help another kid who was getting bullied.
Children then made posters to share with younger grades as to what "friendship heroes" are like, using the descriptor words shared with them, and how to be a friendship hero (i.e., how to help someone who is being bullied).
Posters were hung for two-to-four months after the intervention activity.
|
|
Aktív összehasonlító: Empathy-Condition
This is the experimental group that engaged in the empathy-based intervention activity.
|
Children in the empathy-based condition were asked to provide five descriptors of how two children who were bullied would fee.
Two weeks later they were told the top seven descriptors given by the hundreds of children participating in the project.
This was followed by a brief discussion of how one could best help another kid who was getting bullied.
Children then made posters to share with younger grades as to what being bullied feels like, using the descriptor words shared with them, and how to be a friendship hero (i.e., how to help someone who is being bullied).
Posters were hung for two-to-four months after the intervention activity.
|
Mit mér a tanulmány?
Elsődleges eredményintézkedések
Eredménymérő |
Intézkedés leírása |
Időkeret |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Peer-reported Defending across The School Year
Időkeret: three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
Peer ratings of how often each participating classmate defended bullied peers
|
three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
|
Changes in Self-reported Defending across the School Year
Időkeret: three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
Children's ratings of how often they defended bullied peers
|
three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
|
Changes in Teacher-reported Defending across the School Year
Időkeret: three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
Teachers' ratings of how often each participating student defended bullied peers
|
three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
Másodlagos eredményintézkedések
Eredménymérő |
Intézkedés leírása |
Időkeret |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Perceptions of Defenders across The School Year
Időkeret: three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
Children's ratings of how much children who help others who are bullied are popular, kind, sensitive to other's feelings, leaders, well-liked, confident, and helpful.
Higher scores reflected more positive perceptions of children who defend.
|
three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
|
Changes in Peer Aggression across the School Year
Időkeret: three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
Ratings participating children received from classmates on the items "calls other kids bad names or say mean things to them," "tell other kids they can't play with them or won't be friends with them," and "hit or push other kids."
Ratings were made on a scale from never to a lot.
Ratings received from participating classmates were averaged, and item scores were averaged to compute a composite aggression score with higher scores indicating higher levels of aggressive behavior.
|
three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
|
Changes in Peer Victimization across the School Year
Időkeret: three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
Ratings received from participating classmates on the items "get left out of things that kids are doing (kids don't let him or her play with them), "get hit or pushed," and "kids call [this child] bad names or say mean things to him or her." Items were rated on a scale from never to a lot.
Ratings received from all participating classmates are averaged for each item, and item scores are averaged to create a composite peer victimization score.
Higher scores indicated higher levels of peer victimization.
|
three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
Együttműködők és nyomozók
Itt találhatja meg a tanulmányban érintett személyeket és szervezeteket.
Szponzor
Nyomozók
- Kutatásvezető: Wendy P Gordon, Auburn University
Publikációk és hasznos linkek
A vizsgálattal kapcsolatos információk beviteléért felelős személy önkéntesen bocsátja rendelkezésre ezeket a kiadványokat. Ezek bármiről szólhatnak, ami a tanulmányhoz kapcsolódik.
Tanulmányi rekorddátumok
Ezek a dátumok nyomon követik a ClinicalTrials.gov webhelyre benyújtott vizsgálati rekordok és összefoglaló eredmények benyújtásának folyamatát. A vizsgálati feljegyzéseket és a jelentett eredményeket a Nemzeti Orvostudományi Könyvtár (NLM) felülvizsgálja, hogy megbizonyosodjon arról, hogy megfelelnek-e az adott minőség-ellenőrzési szabványoknak, mielőtt közzéteszik őket a nyilvános weboldalon.
Tanulmány főbb dátumok
Tanulmány kezdete (Tényleges)
2017. szeptember 1.
Elsődleges befejezés (Tényleges)
2019. május 30.
A tanulmány befejezése (Tényleges)
2020. július 30.
Tanulmányi regisztráció dátumai
Először benyújtva
2020. december 14.
Először nyújtották be, amely megfelel a minőségbiztosítási kritériumoknak
2020. december 18.
Első közzététel (Tényleges)
2020. december 23.
Tanulmányi rekordok frissítései
Utolsó frissítés közzétéve (Tényleges)
2020. december 23.
Az utolsó frissítés elküldve, amely megfelel a minőségbiztosítási kritériumoknak
2020. december 18.
Utolsó ellenőrzés
2020. december 1.
Több információ
A tanulmányhoz kapcsolódó kifejezések
Kulcsszavak
További vonatkozó MeSH feltételek
Egyéb vizsgálati azonosító számok
- AuburnUDRT
Terv az egyéni résztvevői adatokhoz (IPD)
Tervezi megosztani az egyéni résztvevői adatokat (IPD)?
Nem
IPD terv leírása
Only de-identified data from all 1,564 participants will be shared
Gyógyszer- és eszközinformációk, tanulmányi dokumentumok
Egy amerikai FDA által szabályozott gyógyszerkészítményt tanulmányoz
Nem
Egy amerikai FDA által szabályozott eszközterméket tanulmányoz
Nem
Ezt az információt közvetlenül a clinicaltrials.gov webhelyről szereztük be, változtatás nélkül. Ha bármilyen kérése van vizsgálati adatainak módosítására, eltávolítására vagy frissítésére, kérjük, írjon a következő címre: register@clinicaltrials.gov. Amint a változás bevezetésre kerül a clinicaltrials.gov oldalon, ez a webhelyünkön is automatikusan frissül. .