Increasing Children's Defending Behaviors: Using Deviance Regulation
18 de dezembro de 2020 atualizado por: Wendy P. Gordon, Auburn University
The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) has identified bullying as a significant public health concern.
The research tests a novel approach to increase children's defending of victims of bullying.
Previous research has shown that the presence of defenders leads to decreases in bullying.
Thus, promoting defending has become a critical component of anti-bullying interventions.
However, how to best motivate defending has been relatively unstudied.
Deviance Regulation Theory (DRT) provides a theoretical basis for motivating positive health and social behaviors.
This theory proposes that individuals are motivated to behave in ways that differentiate them from others in a positive manner.
Accordingly, individuals will be motivated to engage in a behavior if they believe the behavior occurs infrequently and will be viewed positively by others.
As children report that few of their peers defend victims of bullying, the goal of this study is to increase defending by communicating to children that defenders possess traits valued by their peers (e.g., being popular, kind).
Children in 4th-grade and 5th-grade classrooms received a DRT-based anti-bullying intervention or an anti-bullying intervention focused on increasing empathy for victims and strategies for defending peers.
Data collection occurred three times during the school year: a) at baseline, two weeks prior to the intervention; b) 3 months post-intervention; and c) 6 months post-intervention.
Findings showed that compared to the traditional anti-bullying intervention, the DRT-based intervention resulted in larger, more sustained gains in teacher-reported defending, but not peer-reported or self-reported defending.
Contrary to expectations, gains in teacher-reported defending were greatest for children who viewed defending to be normative amongst their classmates.
Increases in defending were also greatest among those children least likely to defend (i.e., those low in popularity and prosocial behavior, and those often bullied by peer).
These findings have implications for the development of anti-bullying interventions and more broadly for understanding how to encourage important behavioral changes in childhood and adolescence.
However, more research is needed to understand why increases were limited to only defending behaviors observable to teachers.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Concluído
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
This study, conducted over the 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 school years examined whether a DRT-based intervention activity resulted in greater increases in defending behaviors in response to witnessed bullying than a more traditional, empathy-based activity.
Thirteen schools were randomly assigned to receive either the DRT-based or empathy-based activity, and all fourth-grade and fifth-grade children were invited to participate.
Defending behaviors were assessed approximately two weeks prior to participation in the activity and at three-month and six-month follow-ups.
Data collected included peer-reports, teacher-reports, and self-reports.
Also examined was whether popularity, peer acceptance, prosocial behavior, peer victimization, empathy, self-efficacy for defending, moral disengagement, or gender moderated intervention effects.
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Real)
1564
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
Alabama
-
Auburn, Alabama, Estados Unidos, 36879-5402
- Auburn University
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Filho
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Child in the fourth-grade or fifth-grade of participating schools
Exclusion Criteria:
- None.
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Ciência básica
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Dobro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: DRT-Condition
This is the experimental group that engaged in the DRT-based intervention activity.
|
Children were asked to provide five descriptors of two children who each engaged in defending behaviors.
Two weeks later they were told the top seven descriptors given by the hundreds of children participating in the project.
This was followed by a brief discussion of how one could best help another kid who was getting bullied.
Children then made posters to share with younger grades as to what "friendship heroes" are like, using the descriptor words shared with them, and how to be a friendship hero (i.e., how to help someone who is being bullied).
Posters were hung for two-to-four months after the intervention activity.
|
|
Comparador Ativo: Empathy-Condition
This is the experimental group that engaged in the empathy-based intervention activity.
|
Children in the empathy-based condition were asked to provide five descriptors of how two children who were bullied would fee.
Two weeks later they were told the top seven descriptors given by the hundreds of children participating in the project.
This was followed by a brief discussion of how one could best help another kid who was getting bullied.
Children then made posters to share with younger grades as to what being bullied feels like, using the descriptor words shared with them, and how to be a friendship hero (i.e., how to help someone who is being bullied).
Posters were hung for two-to-four months after the intervention activity.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Peer-reported Defending across The School Year
Prazo: three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
Peer ratings of how often each participating classmate defended bullied peers
|
three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
|
Changes in Self-reported Defending across the School Year
Prazo: three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
Children's ratings of how often they defended bullied peers
|
three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
|
Changes in Teacher-reported Defending across the School Year
Prazo: three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
Teachers' ratings of how often each participating student defended bullied peers
|
three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Perceptions of Defenders across The School Year
Prazo: three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
Children's ratings of how much children who help others who are bullied are popular, kind, sensitive to other's feelings, leaders, well-liked, confident, and helpful.
Higher scores reflected more positive perceptions of children who defend.
|
three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
|
Changes in Peer Aggression across the School Year
Prazo: three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
Ratings participating children received from classmates on the items "calls other kids bad names or say mean things to them," "tell other kids they can't play with them or won't be friends with them," and "hit or push other kids."
Ratings were made on a scale from never to a lot.
Ratings received from participating classmates were averaged, and item scores were averaged to compute a composite aggression score with higher scores indicating higher levels of aggressive behavior.
|
three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
|
Changes in Peer Victimization across the School Year
Prazo: three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
Ratings received from participating classmates on the items "get left out of things that kids are doing (kids don't let him or her play with them), "get hit or pushed," and "kids call [this child] bad names or say mean things to him or her." Items were rated on a scale from never to a lot.
Ratings received from all participating classmates are averaged for each item, and item scores are averaged to create a composite peer victimization score.
Higher scores indicated higher levels of peer victimization.
|
three-month follow-up; six-month follow-up
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Wendy P Gordon, Auburn University
Publicações e links úteis
A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
1 de setembro de 2017
Conclusão Primária (Real)
30 de maio de 2019
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
30 de julho de 2020
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
14 de dezembro de 2020
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
18 de dezembro de 2020
Primeira postagem (Real)
23 de dezembro de 2020
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
23 de dezembro de 2020
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
18 de dezembro de 2020
Última verificação
1 de dezembro de 2020
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- AuburnUDRT
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Não
Descrição do plano IPD
Only de-identified data from all 1,564 participants will be shared
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .