Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Palliative Short-Course Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer

21 dicembre 2015 aggiornato da: Lorenzo Fuccio, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Palliative Short-Course Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Study

Radiotherapy (RT) is a potentially effective method in the treatment of symptoms of rectal carcinomas. Nevertheless, almost all the evidences about palliative RT in rectal cancer have been published more than two decades ago and were based on 2D conventional RT, which is nowadays no longer used. Consequently, prospective studies on the efficacy of 3D-RT in the management of symptomatic rectal cancer are still lacking. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of palliative short-course 3D RT (SCRT) in patients with symptomatic obstructive rectal cancer.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Condizioni

Descrizione dettagliata

Colorectal carcinoma is one of the cancers with higher incidence, although a progressive decrease in both incidence and mortality rates has been recently recorded in European countries. Rectal cancer may be diagnosed when the disease is at an advanced stage, causing obstructing symptoms. Colostomy represents a standard treatment option in these patients although it negatively impacts on quality of life. Consequently, alternative treatments have been proposed such as self-expandable metallic stent or thermal ablative treatments (i.e. laser or argon plasma coagulation endoscopic treatments), which are, however, not complication-free and not always feasible.

Radiotherapy (RT) is a potentially effective method in the treatment of symptoms of rectal carcinomas. Nevertheless, almost all the evidences about palliative RT in rectal cancer have been published more than two decades ago and were based on 2D conventional RT, which is nowadays no longer used. Consequently, prospective studies on the efficacy of 3D-RT in the management of symptomatic rectal cancer are still lacking.

The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of palliative short-course 3D RT (SCRT) in patients with symptomatic obstructive rectal cancer. This trial was a prospective Phase II study performed at the Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura "Giovanni Paolo II" in Campobasso (Italy).

Therapy Radiotherapy During the simulation process, patients were immobilized in prone position on an up-down table, a device aimed at reducing small-bowel irradiation. To limit the organ motion, patients were instructed to empty the bladder and drink 300 cm3 of water one hour before CT-simulation and before every daily treatment fraction. After oral administration of contrast medium to allow bowel localization, simulation CT images were taken in 5 mm increments over the region of interest. Delineation of the clinical target volume 1 (CTV1) included the gross tumor volume (GTV, both primary tumor and enlarged pelvic nodes) and the corresponding mesorectum plus 2 cm cranio-caudally. The planning target volume (PTV) was the CTV plus 0.8 cm margin in all directions. Organs at risk (OARs) were contoured as follows: 1) the small intestine was defined as all intestinal loops below the sacral promontory (recto-sigmoid junction excluded); 2) femoral heads were contoured from the cranial extremity to the level of the lower margin of ischial tuberosities; 3) the bladder was contoured entirely with no distinction between the wall and its content. Conformal three-dimensional RT was planned (3D-RT) using the Oncentra-Masterplan treatment planning system (Nucletron B.V., Veenendaal, Netherland). Short course RT (total, 25 Gy; 5 fraction in 5 days) was delivered with an isocentric four-field box technique. Dose was specified according to the ICRU Report 62. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were calculated for the PTV and OARs and the QUANTEC constraints were followed. Radiotherapy was delivered by 10-15 MV photon energy. The beams were delivered by an Elekta Precise Linac (Elekta Oncology Systems, Crawley, UK) equipped with standard multi leaf collimators (MLC). A daily online correction protocol of isocenter position was applied using portal imaging, with set-up correction in case of deviations > 0.5 cm in any direction. All stages of the treatment planning process were subjected to a systematic independent check procedure, as previously described. In patients with grade 3-4 toxicity, RT was suspended and treatment was resumed after recovery from toxicity in the degree ≤ 2.

Chemotherapy Use of chemotherapy was allowed based on the referring physician preferences, comorbidities and age. Chemotherapy was discontinued during RT, one week before and after the delivery of RT.

Statistical Analysis Primary end-point of the present study was the rate of complete response (CR) of obstructive symptoms following radiation treatment. According to the Simon's optimal design, the study required the enrollment of 9+8 patients in order to detect a significant rate of CR of obstructive symptoms (error probability limits: alpha 0.05; beta 0.2). In case of no detection of CR of obstructive symptoms in the first 9 enrolled patients, the interruption of enrollment and the closure of the study were planned. In case of detection of at least 1 CR of obstructive symptoms the study design required the recruitment of at least 8 additional patients for the final evaluation of symptoms response rate. To account for a possible non-participation rate of 5%, we increased the sample size of the second stage to nine subjects. Continuous variables were reported as median with range. Categorical variables were reported as proportion and percentage. The survival curves were computed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS v. 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US) and Stata 14.1 SE (Stata corporation, College Station, TX, US)

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

18

Fase

  • Fase 2

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Bambino
  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • (i) rectal adenocarcinoma with obstructive symptoms not amenable for curative treatment due to synchronous metastases or patient inoperable due to age and/or comorbidities;
  • (ii) symptoms of colorectal obstruction (progressive constipation with abdominal pain arising from less than 2 months, vomiting and/or diarrhea) and/or signs of obstruction at radiological examinations (presence of air-fluid levels or the presence of distended colon upstream neoplastic stenosis of the rectum);
  • (iii) candidates for derivative colostomy;
  • (iv) bi-dimensionally measurable disease;
  • (v) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-3;
  • (vi) able to provide a written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (i) RT within 6 months in the same anatomical area before the initiation of study treatment;
  • (ii) clinically detectable ascites;
  • (iii) pregnancy

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: N / A
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: RT for Obstructing Rectal Cancer
Conformal three-dimensional RT was planned (3D-RT) in patients with obstructing rectal cancer not amenable for curative resection
Conformal three-dimensional RT was planned (3D-RT) using the Oncentra-Masterplan treatment planning system (Nucletron B.V., Veenendaal, Netherland). Short course RT (total, 25 Gy; 5 fraction in 5 days) will be delivered with an isocentric four-field box technique.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Lasso di tempo
Change of the obstructive symptoms
Lasso di tempo: Clinical evaluation was performed before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.
Clinical evaluation was performed before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Lasso di tempo
Change of the overall symptoms
Lasso di tempo: Before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.
Before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.
Change of the tumor mass volume
Lasso di tempo: Before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.
Before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria v4.0
Lasso di tempo: Before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.
Before commencement of RT, 4 weeks after the end of treatment and every 6 months until the established length of follow up (3 years) or death.
Overall survival
Lasso di tempo: At the end of follow-up (3 years after RT) or until death of patient
At the end of follow-up (3 years after RT) or until death of patient
Obstruction/colostomy-free survival
Lasso di tempo: At the end of follow-up (3 years after RT) or until death of patient
At the end of follow-up (3 years after RT) or until death of patient

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Direttore dello studio: Alessio G Morganti, Professor, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio

1 ottobre 2003

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 novembre 2012

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 novembre 2012

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

18 dicembre 2015

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

21 dicembre 2015

Primo Inserito (Stima)

24 dicembre 2015

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Stima)

24 dicembre 2015

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

21 dicembre 2015

Ultimo verificato

1 dicembre 2015

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi