Multimedia-based Hormonal Therapy Information Program for Patients With Prostate Cancer
3 marzo 2021 aggiornato da: Ching-Hui Chien, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
Development and Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Multimedia-based Hormonal Therapy Information Program for Patients With Prostate Cancer
This study takes place in the Divisions of Urology.
Patients who have only received hormonal therapy will be enrolled.
Patients will be randomly sorted into an experimental group and a control group after completing a pretest questionnaire.
The experimental group will receive the the multimedia hormone therapy information program once per week for 6 consecutive weeks, while the control group will receive routine care.
The follow-up data collections will be completed at 8 and 12 weeks after the pretest.
For quantitative measurement, the main variables will be social support, self-efficacy, quality of life, and positive thinking.
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Completato
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Descrizione dettagliata
This study takes place in the Divisions of Urology at Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals.
Patients who have only received hormonal therapy will be enrolled.
With reference to past research findings, self-efficacy theory, and experts' advice, a multimedia hormone therapy information program was developed.
The multimedia hormone therapy information program covered 6 topics, namely the recognition of hormone therapy and multimedia information programs, mindfulness, exercise, stress relief, positive thinking, and prevention or reduction of fatigue.
A pilot study will be conducted to check the feasibility of intervention study design and the effectiveness of the program will be tested.
Patients will be randomly sorted into an experimental group (multimedia information group, n = 36 to 40) and a control group (routine care group, n = 36 to 40) after completing a pretest questionnaire.
The experimental group will receive the multimedia information intervention once per week for 6 consecutive weeks, while the control group will receive routine care.
The follow-up data collections will be completed at 8 and 12 weeks after the pretest.
For quantitative measurement, the main variables will be social support, self-efficacy, quality of life, positive thinking, and satisfaction with program.
Generalized Estimating Equations (GEEs) will be used to o analyze data.
Tipo di studio
Interventistico
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
80
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.
Luoghi di studio
-
-
-
Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
20 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)
Accetta volontari sani
No
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Maschio
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with prostate cancer who were receiving hormonal therapy
- patients were at least 20 years old
- patients were ability to communicate in Chinese or Taiwanese
- the married partner agrees to study together, or the single patient has a cohabitation partner who agrees to study together.
- patients or family have a smart phone or tablet and can connect to the Internet.
Exclusion Criteria:
- having a history of other cancers
- unknown diagnosis of prostate cancer or unknown disease status
- patients who received chemotherapy, radiotherapy, radical prostatectomy or other treatments for prostate cancer in the past
- having history of mental disorder, e.g., phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety, , major depression, mania, manic-depressive psychosis, or dementia
- the score of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance is ≧ 2
Piano di studio
Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Ricerca sui servizi sanitari
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Separare
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Sperimentale: Multimedia information group
The experimental group received a weekly multimedia hormone therapy information program for 6 weeks.
|
The multimedia hormone therapy information program lasted 6 weeks and covered 6 topics, namely the recognition of hormone therapy and multimedia information programs, mindfulness, exercise, stress relief, positive thinking, and prevention or reduction of fatigue.
|
|
Nessun intervento: Routine care group
The control group will receive routine care.
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P)
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
A total of 39 items, including five subdimensions, namely, physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, and prostate cancer subscales.
A 5-point scoring method was adopted.
Higher scores indicate higher quality of life
|
pretest
|
|
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P)
Lasso di tempo: 8 weeks after the pretest
|
A total of 39 items, including five subdimensions, namely, physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, and prostate cancer subscales.
A 5-point scoring method was adopted.
Higher scores indicate higher quality of life
|
8 weeks after the pretest
|
|
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P)
Lasso di tempo: 12 weeks after the pretest
|
A total of 39 items, including five subdimensions, namely, physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, and prostate cancer subscales.
A 5-point scoring method was adopted.
Higher scores indicate higher quality of life
|
12 weeks after the pretest
|
|
The Positive Thinking Scale
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
A total of 18 items, including two subscales of personal satisfaction and goal pursuit.
A five-point (1-5) scoring method was used.
Higher scores indicate a higher level of positive thinking
|
pretest
|
|
The Positive Thinking Scale
Lasso di tempo: 8 weeks after the pretest
|
A total of 18 items, including two subscales of personal satisfaction and goal pursuit.
A five-point (1-5) scoring method was used.
Higher scores indicate a higher level of positive thinking
|
8 weeks after the pretest
|
|
The Positive Thinking Scale
Lasso di tempo: 12 weeks after the pretest
|
A total of 18 items, including two subscales of personal satisfaction and goal pursuit.
A five-point (1-5) scoring method was used.
Higher scores indicate a higher level of positive thinking
|
12 weeks after the pretest
|
|
The Hormonal Dimension of The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
11 items were used, the score of each item ranges from 0 to 100 points.
Higher scores indicate fewer hormonal symptoms.
|
pretest
|
|
The Hormonal Dimension of The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
Lasso di tempo: 8 weeks after the pretest
|
11 items were used, the score of each item ranges from 0 to 100 points.
Higher scores indicate fewer hormonal symptoms.
|
8 weeks after the pretest
|
|
The Hormonal Dimension of The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
Lasso di tempo: 12 weeks after the pretest
|
11 items were used, the score of each item ranges from 0 to 100 points.
Higher scores indicate fewer hormonal symptoms.
|
12 weeks after the pretest
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
The General Self-Efficacy Scale
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
The total scale contains 10 items and a 4-point (1-4) scoring method was adopted.
Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy
|
pretest
|
|
The General Self-Efficacy Scale
Lasso di tempo: 8 weeks after the pretest
|
The total scale contains 10 items and a 4-point (1-4) scoring method was adopted.
Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy
|
8 weeks after the pretest
|
|
The General Self-Efficacy Scale
Lasso di tempo: 12 weeks after the pretest
|
The total scale contains 10 items and a 4-point (1-4) scoring method was adopted.
Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy
|
12 weeks after the pretest
|
|
The Social Support Scale
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
A total of 16 items, including four sub-scales of emotional, informational, appraisal, and instrumental support.
A 4-point scoring method (0-3) was used.
Higher scores indicate stronger support.
|
pretest
|
|
The Social Support Scale
Lasso di tempo: 8 weeks after the pretest
|
A total of 16 items, including four sub-scales of emotional, informational, appraisal, and instrumental support.
A 4-point scoring method (0-3) was used.
Higher scores indicate stronger support.
|
8 weeks after the pretest
|
|
The Social Support Scale
Lasso di tempo: 12 weeks after the pretest
|
A total of 16 items, including four sub-scales of emotional, informational, appraisal, and instrumental support.
A 4-point scoring method (0-3) was used.
Higher scores indicate stronger support.
|
12 weeks after the pretest
|
Altre misure di risultato
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Basic and disease information list 1
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Age
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 2
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Education level
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 3
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Marital status
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 4
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Religion
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 5
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Occupation
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 6
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Annual family income (NTD)
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 7
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Number of children
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 8
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Join a support group
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 9
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Time since diagnosis (months)
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 10
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Tumor-node-metastasis Cancer stage
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 11
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Gleason score
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 12
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Treatment
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 13
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
History of chronic disease
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 14
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Living status
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 15
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Height in centimetre
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 16
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Body Mass Index in kg/m2 will be computed from height and body weight
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 17
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Body weight in kilograms
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 18
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Waist circumference in centimetre
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 19
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Serum Prostatic Specific Antigen level
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 20
Lasso di tempo: 8 weeks after the pretest
|
Serum Prostatic Specific Antigen level
|
8 weeks after the pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 21
Lasso di tempo: 12 weeks after the pretest
|
Serum Prostatic Specific Antigen level
|
12 weeks after the pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 22
Lasso di tempo: pretest
|
Perceived health status.
A 11-point (0-100) scoring method was used.
Higher scores indicate better health condition.
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 23
Lasso di tempo: 8 weeks after the pretest
|
Perceived health status.
A 11-point (0-100) scoring method was used.
Higher scores indicate better health condition.
|
8 weeks after the pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 24
Lasso di tempo: 12 weeks after the pretest
|
Perceived health status.
A 11-point (0-100) scoring method was used.
Higher scores indicate better health condition.
|
12 weeks after the pretest
|
|
List of satisfaction with Program
Lasso di tempo: 8 weeks after the pretest
|
Five items were self-designed to understand the satisfaction of men in the experimental group.
A 11-point (0-100) scoring method was used.
Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.
|
8 weeks after the pretest
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Ching-Hui Chien, PhD, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei city, Taiwan
Pubblicazioni e link utili
La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.
Pubblicazioni generali
- Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Mar;11(3):570-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.570.
- Wei JT, Dunn RL, Litwin MS, Sandler HM, Sanda MG. Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):899-905. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00858-x.
- Esper P, Mo F, Chodak G, Sinner M, Cella D, Pienta KJ. Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the functional assessment of cancer therapy-prostate instrument. Urology. 1997 Dec;50(6):920-8. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00459-7.
- Cary KC, Singla N, Cowan JE, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR. Impact of androgen deprivation therapy on mental and emotional well-being in men with prostate cancer: analysis from the CaPSURE registry. J Urol. 2014 Apr;191(4):964-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.098. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
- Cheung SK, Sun SY. Assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: further validation of the Chinese version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychol Rep. 1999 Dec;85(3 Pt 2):1221-4. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1999.85.3f.1221.
- Chien CH, Liu KL, Chien HT, Liu HE. The effects of psychosocial strategies on anxiety and depression of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Jan;51(1):28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.12.019. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
- Chien CH, Chuang CK, Liu KL, Wu CT, Pang ST, Tsay PK, Chang YH, Huang XY, Liu HE. Effects of individual and partner factors on anxiety and depression in Taiwanese prostate cancer patients: A longitudinal study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Mar;27(2):e12753. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12753. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
- Cockle-Hearne J, Barnett D, Hicks J, Simpson M, White I, Faithfull S. A Web-Based Intervention to Reduce Distress After Prostate Cancer Treatment: Development and Feasibility of the Getting Down to Coping Program in Two Different Clinical Settings. JMIR Cancer. 2018 Apr 30;4(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/cancer.8918.
- Diefenbach MA, Mohamed NE, Butz BP, Bar-Chama N, Stock R, Cesaretti J, Hassan W, Samadi D, Hall SJ. Acceptability and preliminary feasibility of an internet/CD-ROM-based education and decision program for early-stage prostate cancer patients: randomized pilot study. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jan 13;14(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1891.
- Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration; Fitzmaurice C, Akinyemiju TF, Al Lami FH, Alam T, Alizadeh-Navaei R, Allen C, Alsharif U, Alvis-Guzman N, Amini E, Anderson BO, Aremu O, Artaman A, Asgedom SW, Assadi R, Atey TM, Avila-Burgos L, Awasthi A, Ba Saleem HO, Barac A, Bennett JR, Bensenor IM, Bhakta N, Brenner H, Cahuana-Hurtado L, Castaneda-Orjuela CA, Catala-Lopez F, Choi JJ, Christopher DJ, Chung SC, Curado MP, Dandona L, Dandona R, das Neves J, Dey S, Dharmaratne SD, Doku DT, Driscoll TR, Dubey M, Ebrahimi H, Edessa D, El-Khatib Z, Endries AY, Fischer F, Force LM, Foreman KJ, Gebrehiwot SW, Gopalani SV, Grosso G, Gupta R, Gyawali B, Hamadeh RR, Hamidi S, Harvey J, Hassen HY, Hay RJ, Hay SI, Heibati B, Hiluf MK, Horita N, Hosgood HD, Ilesanmi OS, Innos K, Islami F, Jakovljevic MB, Johnson SC, Jonas JB, Kasaeian A, Kassa TD, Khader YS, Khan EA, Khan G, Khang YH, Khosravi MH, Khubchandani J, Kopec JA, Kumar GA, Kutz M, Lad DP, Lafranconi A, Lan Q, Legesse Y, Leigh J, Linn S, Lunevicius R, Majeed A, Malekzadeh R, Malta DC, Mantovani LG, McMahon BJ, Meier T, Melaku YA, Melku M, Memiah P, Mendoza W, Meretoja TJ, Mezgebe HB, Miller TR, Mohammed S, Mokdad AH, Moosazadeh M, Moraga P, Mousavi SM, Nangia V, Nguyen CT, Nong VM, Ogbo FA, Olagunju AT, Pa M, Park EK, Patel T, Pereira DM, Pishgar F, Postma MJ, Pourmalek F, Qorbani M, Rafay A, Rawaf S, Rawaf DL, Roshandel G, Safiri S, Salimzadeh H, Sanabria JR, Santric Milicevic MM, Sartorius B, Satpathy M, Sepanlou SG, Shackelford KA, Shaikh MA, Sharif-Alhoseini M, She J, Shin MJ, Shiue I, Shrime MG, Sinke AH, Sisay M, Sligar A, Sufiyan MB, Sykes BL, Tabares-Seisdedos R, Tessema GA, Topor-Madry R, Tran TT, Tran BX, Ukwaja KN, Vlassov VV, Vollset SE, Weiderpass E, Williams HC, Yimer NB, Yonemoto N, Younis MZ, Murray CJL, Naghavi M. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;4(11):1553-1568. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2706.
- Keating NL, O'Malley A, Freedland SJ, Smith MR. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy: observational study of veterans with prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Oct 3;104(19):1518-23. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs376. No abstract available.
- Chien CH, Chuang CK, Liu KL, Wu CT, Pang ST, Chang YH. Health-Related Quality of Life and Its Associated Factors in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Receive Androgen Deprivation Therapy. Cancer Nurs. 2021 Jan/Feb;44(1):E34-E42. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000752.
- Chien CH, Chuang CK, Liu KL, Pang ST, Wu CT, Chang YH. Exploring the Positive Thinking of Patients With Prostate Cancer: Self-efficacy as a Mediator. Cancer Nurs. 2022 Mar-Apr 01;45(2):E329-E337. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000868.
- Loiselle CG, Edgar L, Batist G, Lu J, Lauzier S. The impact of a multimedia informational intervention on psychosocial adjustment among individuals with newly diagnosed breast or prostate cancer: a feasibility study. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.026. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
- Van Gerven PW, Paas F, Van Merrienboer JJ, Hendriks M, Schmidt HG. The efficiency of multimedia learning into old age. Br J Educ Psychol. 2003 Dec;73(Pt 4):489-505. doi: 10.1348/000709903322591208.
- Wootten AC, Abbott JA, Meyer D, Chisholm K, Austin DW, Klein B, McCabe M, Murphy DG, Costello AJ. Preliminary results of a randomised controlled trial of an online psychological intervention to reduce distress in men treated for localised prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):471-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.024. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
- Zhang Q, Zhao H, Zheng Y. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on symptom variables and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Mar;27(3):771-781. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4570-x. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
Studiare le date dei record
Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
13 maggio 2019
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
31 gennaio 2021
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
31 gennaio 2021
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
23 dicembre 2020
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
30 dicembre 2020
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
5 gennaio 2021
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
5 marzo 2021
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
3 marzo 2021
Ultimo verificato
1 marzo 2021
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- 201602024B0C501
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
NO
Descrizione del piano IPD
The data of this study will be kept and managed by PI of Ching-Hui Chien.
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
No
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
No
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .