Multimedia-based Hormonal Therapy Information Program for Patients With Prostate Cancer
3 de março de 2021 atualizado por: Ching-Hui Chien, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
Development and Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Multimedia-based Hormonal Therapy Information Program for Patients With Prostate Cancer
This study takes place in the Divisions of Urology.
Patients who have only received hormonal therapy will be enrolled.
Patients will be randomly sorted into an experimental group and a control group after completing a pretest questionnaire.
The experimental group will receive the the multimedia hormone therapy information program once per week for 6 consecutive weeks, while the control group will receive routine care.
The follow-up data collections will be completed at 8 and 12 weeks after the pretest.
For quantitative measurement, the main variables will be social support, self-efficacy, quality of life, and positive thinking.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Concluído
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
This study takes place in the Divisions of Urology at Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals.
Patients who have only received hormonal therapy will be enrolled.
With reference to past research findings, self-efficacy theory, and experts' advice, a multimedia hormone therapy information program was developed.
The multimedia hormone therapy information program covered 6 topics, namely the recognition of hormone therapy and multimedia information programs, mindfulness, exercise, stress relief, positive thinking, and prevention or reduction of fatigue.
A pilot study will be conducted to check the feasibility of intervention study design and the effectiveness of the program will be tested.
Patients will be randomly sorted into an experimental group (multimedia information group, n = 36 to 40) and a control group (routine care group, n = 36 to 40) after completing a pretest questionnaire.
The experimental group will receive the multimedia information intervention once per week for 6 consecutive weeks, while the control group will receive routine care.
The follow-up data collections will be completed at 8 and 12 weeks after the pretest.
For quantitative measurement, the main variables will be social support, self-efficacy, quality of life, positive thinking, and satisfaction with program.
Generalized Estimating Equations (GEEs) will be used to o analyze data.
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Real)
80
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
20 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Macho
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients with prostate cancer who were receiving hormonal therapy
- patients were at least 20 years old
- patients were ability to communicate in Chinese or Taiwanese
- the married partner agrees to study together, or the single patient has a cohabitation partner who agrees to study together.
- patients or family have a smart phone or tablet and can connect to the Internet.
Exclusion Criteria:
- having a history of other cancers
- unknown diagnosis of prostate cancer or unknown disease status
- patients who received chemotherapy, radiotherapy, radical prostatectomy or other treatments for prostate cancer in the past
- having history of mental disorder, e.g., phobia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, generalized anxiety, , major depression, mania, manic-depressive psychosis, or dementia
- the score of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance is ≧ 2
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Pesquisa de serviços de saúde
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Solteiro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Multimedia information group
The experimental group received a weekly multimedia hormone therapy information program for 6 weeks.
|
The multimedia hormone therapy information program lasted 6 weeks and covered 6 topics, namely the recognition of hormone therapy and multimedia information programs, mindfulness, exercise, stress relief, positive thinking, and prevention or reduction of fatigue.
|
|
Sem intervenção: Routine care group
The control group will receive routine care.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P)
Prazo: pretest
|
A total of 39 items, including five subdimensions, namely, physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, and prostate cancer subscales.
A 5-point scoring method was adopted.
Higher scores indicate higher quality of life
|
pretest
|
|
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P)
Prazo: 8 weeks after the pretest
|
A total of 39 items, including five subdimensions, namely, physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, and prostate cancer subscales.
A 5-point scoring method was adopted.
Higher scores indicate higher quality of life
|
8 weeks after the pretest
|
|
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P)
Prazo: 12 weeks after the pretest
|
A total of 39 items, including five subdimensions, namely, physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being, and prostate cancer subscales.
A 5-point scoring method was adopted.
Higher scores indicate higher quality of life
|
12 weeks after the pretest
|
|
The Positive Thinking Scale
Prazo: pretest
|
A total of 18 items, including two subscales of personal satisfaction and goal pursuit.
A five-point (1-5) scoring method was used.
Higher scores indicate a higher level of positive thinking
|
pretest
|
|
The Positive Thinking Scale
Prazo: 8 weeks after the pretest
|
A total of 18 items, including two subscales of personal satisfaction and goal pursuit.
A five-point (1-5) scoring method was used.
Higher scores indicate a higher level of positive thinking
|
8 weeks after the pretest
|
|
The Positive Thinking Scale
Prazo: 12 weeks after the pretest
|
A total of 18 items, including two subscales of personal satisfaction and goal pursuit.
A five-point (1-5) scoring method was used.
Higher scores indicate a higher level of positive thinking
|
12 weeks after the pretest
|
|
The Hormonal Dimension of The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
Prazo: pretest
|
11 items were used, the score of each item ranges from 0 to 100 points.
Higher scores indicate fewer hormonal symptoms.
|
pretest
|
|
The Hormonal Dimension of The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
Prazo: 8 weeks after the pretest
|
11 items were used, the score of each item ranges from 0 to 100 points.
Higher scores indicate fewer hormonal symptoms.
|
8 weeks after the pretest
|
|
The Hormonal Dimension of The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite
Prazo: 12 weeks after the pretest
|
11 items were used, the score of each item ranges from 0 to 100 points.
Higher scores indicate fewer hormonal symptoms.
|
12 weeks after the pretest
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
The General Self-Efficacy Scale
Prazo: pretest
|
The total scale contains 10 items and a 4-point (1-4) scoring method was adopted.
Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy
|
pretest
|
|
The General Self-Efficacy Scale
Prazo: 8 weeks after the pretest
|
The total scale contains 10 items and a 4-point (1-4) scoring method was adopted.
Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy
|
8 weeks after the pretest
|
|
The General Self-Efficacy Scale
Prazo: 12 weeks after the pretest
|
The total scale contains 10 items and a 4-point (1-4) scoring method was adopted.
Higher scores indicate higher self-efficacy
|
12 weeks after the pretest
|
|
The Social Support Scale
Prazo: pretest
|
A total of 16 items, including four sub-scales of emotional, informational, appraisal, and instrumental support.
A 4-point scoring method (0-3) was used.
Higher scores indicate stronger support.
|
pretest
|
|
The Social Support Scale
Prazo: 8 weeks after the pretest
|
A total of 16 items, including four sub-scales of emotional, informational, appraisal, and instrumental support.
A 4-point scoring method (0-3) was used.
Higher scores indicate stronger support.
|
8 weeks after the pretest
|
|
The Social Support Scale
Prazo: 12 weeks after the pretest
|
A total of 16 items, including four sub-scales of emotional, informational, appraisal, and instrumental support.
A 4-point scoring method (0-3) was used.
Higher scores indicate stronger support.
|
12 weeks after the pretest
|
Outras medidas de resultado
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Basic and disease information list 1
Prazo: pretest
|
Age
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 2
Prazo: pretest
|
Education level
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 3
Prazo: pretest
|
Marital status
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 4
Prazo: pretest
|
Religion
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 5
Prazo: pretest
|
Occupation
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 6
Prazo: pretest
|
Annual family income (NTD)
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 7
Prazo: pretest
|
Number of children
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 8
Prazo: pretest
|
Join a support group
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 9
Prazo: pretest
|
Time since diagnosis (months)
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 10
Prazo: pretest
|
Tumor-node-metastasis Cancer stage
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 11
Prazo: pretest
|
Gleason score
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 12
Prazo: pretest
|
Treatment
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 13
Prazo: pretest
|
History of chronic disease
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 14
Prazo: pretest
|
Living status
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 15
Prazo: pretest
|
Height in centimetre
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 16
Prazo: pretest
|
Body Mass Index in kg/m2 will be computed from height and body weight
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 17
Prazo: pretest
|
Body weight in kilograms
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 18
Prazo: pretest
|
Waist circumference in centimetre
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 19
Prazo: pretest
|
Serum Prostatic Specific Antigen level
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 20
Prazo: 8 weeks after the pretest
|
Serum Prostatic Specific Antigen level
|
8 weeks after the pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 21
Prazo: 12 weeks after the pretest
|
Serum Prostatic Specific Antigen level
|
12 weeks after the pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 22
Prazo: pretest
|
Perceived health status.
A 11-point (0-100) scoring method was used.
Higher scores indicate better health condition.
|
pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 23
Prazo: 8 weeks after the pretest
|
Perceived health status.
A 11-point (0-100) scoring method was used.
Higher scores indicate better health condition.
|
8 weeks after the pretest
|
|
Basic and disease information list 24
Prazo: 12 weeks after the pretest
|
Perceived health status.
A 11-point (0-100) scoring method was used.
Higher scores indicate better health condition.
|
12 weeks after the pretest
|
|
List of satisfaction with Program
Prazo: 8 weeks after the pretest
|
Five items were self-designed to understand the satisfaction of men in the experimental group.
A 11-point (0-100) scoring method was used.
Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.
|
8 weeks after the pretest
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Ching-Hui Chien, PhD, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei city, Taiwan
Publicações e links úteis
A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.
Publicações Gerais
- Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993 Mar;11(3):570-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.570.
- Wei JT, Dunn RL, Litwin MS, Sandler HM, Sanda MG. Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):899-905. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00858-x.
- Esper P, Mo F, Chodak G, Sinner M, Cella D, Pienta KJ. Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the functional assessment of cancer therapy-prostate instrument. Urology. 1997 Dec;50(6):920-8. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00459-7.
- Cary KC, Singla N, Cowan JE, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR. Impact of androgen deprivation therapy on mental and emotional well-being in men with prostate cancer: analysis from the CaPSURE registry. J Urol. 2014 Apr;191(4):964-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.098. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
- Cheung SK, Sun SY. Assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: further validation of the Chinese version of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Psychol Rep. 1999 Dec;85(3 Pt 2):1221-4. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1999.85.3f.1221.
- Chien CH, Liu KL, Chien HT, Liu HE. The effects of psychosocial strategies on anxiety and depression of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Jan;51(1):28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.12.019. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
- Chien CH, Chuang CK, Liu KL, Wu CT, Pang ST, Tsay PK, Chang YH, Huang XY, Liu HE. Effects of individual and partner factors on anxiety and depression in Taiwanese prostate cancer patients: A longitudinal study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Mar;27(2):e12753. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12753. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
- Cockle-Hearne J, Barnett D, Hicks J, Simpson M, White I, Faithfull S. A Web-Based Intervention to Reduce Distress After Prostate Cancer Treatment: Development and Feasibility of the Getting Down to Coping Program in Two Different Clinical Settings. JMIR Cancer. 2018 Apr 30;4(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/cancer.8918.
- Diefenbach MA, Mohamed NE, Butz BP, Bar-Chama N, Stock R, Cesaretti J, Hassan W, Samadi D, Hall SJ. Acceptability and preliminary feasibility of an internet/CD-ROM-based education and decision program for early-stage prostate cancer patients: randomized pilot study. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jan 13;14(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1891.
- Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration; Fitzmaurice C, Akinyemiju TF, Al Lami FH, Alam T, Alizadeh-Navaei R, Allen C, Alsharif U, Alvis-Guzman N, Amini E, Anderson BO, Aremu O, Artaman A, Asgedom SW, Assadi R, Atey TM, Avila-Burgos L, Awasthi A, Ba Saleem HO, Barac A, Bennett JR, Bensenor IM, Bhakta N, Brenner H, Cahuana-Hurtado L, Castaneda-Orjuela CA, Catala-Lopez F, Choi JJ, Christopher DJ, Chung SC, Curado MP, Dandona L, Dandona R, das Neves J, Dey S, Dharmaratne SD, Doku DT, Driscoll TR, Dubey M, Ebrahimi H, Edessa D, El-Khatib Z, Endries AY, Fischer F, Force LM, Foreman KJ, Gebrehiwot SW, Gopalani SV, Grosso G, Gupta R, Gyawali B, Hamadeh RR, Hamidi S, Harvey J, Hassen HY, Hay RJ, Hay SI, Heibati B, Hiluf MK, Horita N, Hosgood HD, Ilesanmi OS, Innos K, Islami F, Jakovljevic MB, Johnson SC, Jonas JB, Kasaeian A, Kassa TD, Khader YS, Khan EA, Khan G, Khang YH, Khosravi MH, Khubchandani J, Kopec JA, Kumar GA, Kutz M, Lad DP, Lafranconi A, Lan Q, Legesse Y, Leigh J, Linn S, Lunevicius R, Majeed A, Malekzadeh R, Malta DC, Mantovani LG, McMahon BJ, Meier T, Melaku YA, Melku M, Memiah P, Mendoza W, Meretoja TJ, Mezgebe HB, Miller TR, Mohammed S, Mokdad AH, Moosazadeh M, Moraga P, Mousavi SM, Nangia V, Nguyen CT, Nong VM, Ogbo FA, Olagunju AT, Pa M, Park EK, Patel T, Pereira DM, Pishgar F, Postma MJ, Pourmalek F, Qorbani M, Rafay A, Rawaf S, Rawaf DL, Roshandel G, Safiri S, Salimzadeh H, Sanabria JR, Santric Milicevic MM, Sartorius B, Satpathy M, Sepanlou SG, Shackelford KA, Shaikh MA, Sharif-Alhoseini M, She J, Shin MJ, Shiue I, Shrime MG, Sinke AH, Sisay M, Sligar A, Sufiyan MB, Sykes BL, Tabares-Seisdedos R, Tessema GA, Topor-Madry R, Tran TT, Tran BX, Ukwaja KN, Vlassov VV, Vollset SE, Weiderpass E, Williams HC, Yimer NB, Yonemoto N, Younis MZ, Murray CJL, Naghavi M. Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;4(11):1553-1568. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2706.
- Keating NL, O'Malley A, Freedland SJ, Smith MR. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy: observational study of veterans with prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Oct 3;104(19):1518-23. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs376. No abstract available.
- Chien CH, Chuang CK, Liu KL, Wu CT, Pang ST, Chang YH. Health-Related Quality of Life and Its Associated Factors in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Receive Androgen Deprivation Therapy. Cancer Nurs. 2021 Jan/Feb;44(1):E34-E42. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000752.
- Chien CH, Chuang CK, Liu KL, Pang ST, Wu CT, Chang YH. Exploring the Positive Thinking of Patients With Prostate Cancer: Self-efficacy as a Mediator. Cancer Nurs. 2022 Mar-Apr 01;45(2):E329-E337. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000868.
- Loiselle CG, Edgar L, Batist G, Lu J, Lauzier S. The impact of a multimedia informational intervention on psychosocial adjustment among individuals with newly diagnosed breast or prostate cancer: a feasibility study. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jul;80(1):48-55. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.09.026. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
- Van Gerven PW, Paas F, Van Merrienboer JJ, Hendriks M, Schmidt HG. The efficiency of multimedia learning into old age. Br J Educ Psychol. 2003 Dec;73(Pt 4):489-505. doi: 10.1348/000709903322591208.
- Wootten AC, Abbott JA, Meyer D, Chisholm K, Austin DW, Klein B, McCabe M, Murphy DG, Costello AJ. Preliminary results of a randomised controlled trial of an online psychological intervention to reduce distress in men treated for localised prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):471-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.024. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
- Zhang Q, Zhao H, Zheng Y. Effectiveness of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) on symptom variables and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Mar;27(3):771-781. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4570-x. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
13 de maio de 2019
Conclusão Primária (Real)
31 de janeiro de 2021
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
31 de janeiro de 2021
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
23 de dezembro de 2020
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
30 de dezembro de 2020
Primeira postagem (Real)
5 de janeiro de 2021
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
5 de março de 2021
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
3 de março de 2021
Última verificação
1 de março de 2021
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 201602024B0C501
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
NÃO
Descrição do plano IPD
The data of this study will be kept and managed by PI of Ching-Hui Chien.
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .