Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Guided Bone Regeneration With Custom Made Meshes

25 giugno 2021 aggiornato da: Giuseppe Lizio, University of Bologna

Guided Bone Regeneration With Custom Made Meshes in the Dental Rehabilitation of Three Dimensional and Extended Defect of the Jaws.

Twenty patients underwent a guided bone regenerative procedure with the application of a virtually projected customized mesh as containment and stabilizer of particulate bone graft. The entity of bone volume reconstructed after healing were digitally analysed on radiological imaging and expressed in volumetric data and in percentage of what planned before the operation. This datum was correlated with predictors variables potentially affecting the final results. As secondary outcome the implant results after the prosthetic loading was evaluated in terms of survival, success and complication.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

The implant-borne rehabilitation of three-dimensional and extended alveolar defects is not simple in any case: anatomic and prosthetic demands often require bone reconstructive procedures. Up to date, we can entirely virtually simulate our treatment .The design and printing of a customized mesh mimicking the ideal reconstruction eliminate the intra-operative handling and trimming, with reduced surgical timings and minimal stress for the soft tissues.

The aim is to verify if virtual planning with a customized scaffold could improve the predictability of a complex bone reconstruction in terms of bone reconstruction and implant results.

Twenty patients underwent a guided bone regenerative procedure with the application of a virtually projected customized mesh as containment and stabilizer of particulate bone graft. The entity of bone volume reconstructed after healing were digitally analysed on radiological imaging and expressed in volumetric data and in percentage of what planned before the operation. This datum was correlated with predictors variables potentially affecting the final result: six months at least after surgery, a new cone-beam CT was taken;the pre-and postoperative CT datasets were converted into three-dimensional models and digitally aligned; the reconstructed bone volumes (RBV) were calculated according to the planned bone volumes (PBVs), outlining the areas under the mesh. These values were correlated with complications, atrophies' location and the entity of virtually planned bone volume. As secondary outcome the implant results after the prosthetic loading was evaluated in terms of survival, success and complication.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

20

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The presence of horizontal and vertical alveolar defects in both jaws, inadequate for the placement of at least two fixtures, even ≤6 mm long ones;
  • ≥ 18 years;
  • informed consent signed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute or chronic infections in the head and neck;
  • smoking >10 cigarettes per day;
  • uncontrolled diabetes (glycated hemoglobin level > 7 mg/dL);
  • a history of radiation therapy in the head or neck region;
  • current antitumor chemotherapy;
  • liver, blood, or kidney disease;
  • immunosuppression;
  • everyday corticosteroid use;
  • pregnancy;
  • inflammatory and autoimmune disease of the oral cavity;
  • poor oral hygiene and motivation

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: N / A
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Altro: Subjects undergoing virtually planned GBR for extended and complex alveolar defects.

Subjects undergoing virtually planned GBR for extended and complex alveolar defects.

The subjects were selected from the population of patients referring to the Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Unit of S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital for oral function rehabilitation. Eligibility criteria were: the presence of horizontal and vertical alveolar defects in both jaws, inadequate for the placement of at least two fixtures, even ≤6 mm long ones; ≥ 18 years; informed consent signed.

After local anesthesia, the surgery started with a mid-crestal incision with vertical releasing cuts followed by the full-thickness buccal and lingual/palatal flaps raising to expose the bone defect completely. The flaps were coronally extended to assure a complete closure with a passive suture above the titanium. Subsequently, an intra-oral mandibular ramus bone cortical block was harvested in the molar zone. The bone block was milled and mixed with freeze-dried. The particulate graft was put to fill the deficit above the mesh until its perfect stability and unity with the defect's borders. Two or three titanium mini-screws were used to stabilize the device , and the flaps were carefully sutured. Ceftriaxone was administered intravenously at a loading dose of 2 g; together with a non-steroidal analgesic, it was continued at two g/die per os beginning the day after surgery and continuing for six days.
Altri nomi:
  • ricostruzione ossea

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Bone regeneration volumes
Lasso di tempo: 6 months after surgery
The bone reconstruction was calculated comparing the pre-operative and postoperative volumes. The Reconstructed Bone Volume (RBV) derived by subtracting the Lacking Bone Volume (LBV) values from Planned Bone Volume (PBV) ones. The pre-and postoperative CT datasets were converted into 3D models using Amira imaging software, version 5.3.3. The segmentation regarded almost the entire jaw structure to have at least six precise anatomical points of matching for the superimposition. After that, the pre and postoperative models were digitally aligned with Geomagic Studio 12 software. After the alignment was verified at a minimum range of tolerance of error level of ±0.37 mm in the areas no involved by the surgery, the measurements were performed. In every single slice, the space between the mesh profile and the basal bone was virtually selected and rendered to obtain the PBV; the area representative for the empty space according to the gray-scale of pixels was rendered for the LBV.
6 months after surgery

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Implant survival.
Lasso di tempo: 1 year after implant loading at least.
The number of implants in function at the end of follow-up was recorded
1 year after implant loading at least.
Complication rate
Lasso di tempo: through study completion, an average of 2 years.
The number of complications (peri-implantitis, infections, prosthetic fractures, soft tissue problems) was recorded and expressed in numerical data.
through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Implant success
Lasso di tempo: 1 year after implant loading at least.
The implant succes was calculated in respect to the bone resorption around each implant, radiographically assessed: with a dedicated software, the distance between the implant shoulder and the higher point of bone-implant contact was measured mesially and distally, attributing a mean value to each implant. These measures, expressed in millimeters, were recorded and reported as numerical data.
1 year after implant loading at least.

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Giuseppe lizio, DDS, University of Bologna (Italy) UNIBO

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

9 aprile 2013

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

15 maggio 2018

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

31 dicembre 2020

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

15 giugno 2021

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

25 giugno 2021

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

28 giugno 2021

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

28 giugno 2021

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

25 giugno 2021

Ultimo verificato

1 giugno 2021

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • 121/2013

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi