Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Guided Bone Regeneration With Custom Made Meshes

25 de junho de 2021 atualizado por: Giuseppe Lizio, University of Bologna

Guided Bone Regeneration With Custom Made Meshes in the Dental Rehabilitation of Three Dimensional and Extended Defect of the Jaws.

Twenty patients underwent a guided bone regenerative procedure with the application of a virtually projected customized mesh as containment and stabilizer of particulate bone graft. The entity of bone volume reconstructed after healing were digitally analysed on radiological imaging and expressed in volumetric data and in percentage of what planned before the operation. This datum was correlated with predictors variables potentially affecting the final results. As secondary outcome the implant results after the prosthetic loading was evaluated in terms of survival, success and complication.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

The implant-borne rehabilitation of three-dimensional and extended alveolar defects is not simple in any case: anatomic and prosthetic demands often require bone reconstructive procedures. Up to date, we can entirely virtually simulate our treatment .The design and printing of a customized mesh mimicking the ideal reconstruction eliminate the intra-operative handling and trimming, with reduced surgical timings and minimal stress for the soft tissues.

The aim is to verify if virtual planning with a customized scaffold could improve the predictability of a complex bone reconstruction in terms of bone reconstruction and implant results.

Twenty patients underwent a guided bone regenerative procedure with the application of a virtually projected customized mesh as containment and stabilizer of particulate bone graft. The entity of bone volume reconstructed after healing were digitally analysed on radiological imaging and expressed in volumetric data and in percentage of what planned before the operation. This datum was correlated with predictors variables potentially affecting the final result: six months at least after surgery, a new cone-beam CT was taken;the pre-and postoperative CT datasets were converted into three-dimensional models and digitally aligned; the reconstructed bone volumes (RBV) were calculated according to the planned bone volumes (PBVs), outlining the areas under the mesh. These values were correlated with complications, atrophies' location and the entity of virtually planned bone volume. As secondary outcome the implant results after the prosthetic loading was evaluated in terms of survival, success and complication.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

20

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The presence of horizontal and vertical alveolar defects in both jaws, inadequate for the placement of at least two fixtures, even ≤6 mm long ones;
  • ≥ 18 years;
  • informed consent signed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute or chronic infections in the head and neck;
  • smoking >10 cigarettes per day;
  • uncontrolled diabetes (glycated hemoglobin level > 7 mg/dL);
  • a history of radiation therapy in the head or neck region;
  • current antitumor chemotherapy;
  • liver, blood, or kidney disease;
  • immunosuppression;
  • everyday corticosteroid use;
  • pregnancy;
  • inflammatory and autoimmune disease of the oral cavity;
  • poor oral hygiene and motivation

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: N / D
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Outro: Subjects undergoing virtually planned GBR for extended and complex alveolar defects.

Subjects undergoing virtually planned GBR for extended and complex alveolar defects.

The subjects were selected from the population of patients referring to the Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Unit of S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital for oral function rehabilitation. Eligibility criteria were: the presence of horizontal and vertical alveolar defects in both jaws, inadequate for the placement of at least two fixtures, even ≤6 mm long ones; ≥ 18 years; informed consent signed.

After local anesthesia, the surgery started with a mid-crestal incision with vertical releasing cuts followed by the full-thickness buccal and lingual/palatal flaps raising to expose the bone defect completely. The flaps were coronally extended to assure a complete closure with a passive suture above the titanium. Subsequently, an intra-oral mandibular ramus bone cortical block was harvested in the molar zone. The bone block was milled and mixed with freeze-dried. The particulate graft was put to fill the deficit above the mesh until its perfect stability and unity with the defect's borders. Two or three titanium mini-screws were used to stabilize the device , and the flaps were carefully sutured. Ceftriaxone was administered intravenously at a loading dose of 2 g; together with a non-steroidal analgesic, it was continued at two g/die per os beginning the day after surgery and continuing for six days.
Outros nomes:
  • reconstrução óssea

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Bone regeneration volumes
Prazo: 6 months after surgery
The bone reconstruction was calculated comparing the pre-operative and postoperative volumes. The Reconstructed Bone Volume (RBV) derived by subtracting the Lacking Bone Volume (LBV) values from Planned Bone Volume (PBV) ones. The pre-and postoperative CT datasets were converted into 3D models using Amira imaging software, version 5.3.3. The segmentation regarded almost the entire jaw structure to have at least six precise anatomical points of matching for the superimposition. After that, the pre and postoperative models were digitally aligned with Geomagic Studio 12 software. After the alignment was verified at a minimum range of tolerance of error level of ±0.37 mm in the areas no involved by the surgery, the measurements were performed. In every single slice, the space between the mesh profile and the basal bone was virtually selected and rendered to obtain the PBV; the area representative for the empty space according to the gray-scale of pixels was rendered for the LBV.
6 months after surgery

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Implant survival.
Prazo: 1 year after implant loading at least.
The number of implants in function at the end of follow-up was recorded
1 year after implant loading at least.
Complication rate
Prazo: through study completion, an average of 2 years.
The number of complications (peri-implantitis, infections, prosthetic fractures, soft tissue problems) was recorded and expressed in numerical data.
through study completion, an average of 2 years.
Implant success
Prazo: 1 year after implant loading at least.
The implant succes was calculated in respect to the bone resorption around each implant, radiographically assessed: with a dedicated software, the distance between the implant shoulder and the higher point of bone-implant contact was measured mesially and distally, attributing a mean value to each implant. These measures, expressed in millimeters, were recorded and reported as numerical data.
1 year after implant loading at least.

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Giuseppe lizio, DDS, University of Bologna (Italy) UNIBO

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

9 de abril de 2013

Conclusão Primária (Real)

15 de maio de 2018

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

31 de dezembro de 2020

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

15 de junho de 2021

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

25 de junho de 2021

Primeira postagem (Real)

28 de junho de 2021

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

28 de junho de 2021

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

25 de junho de 2021

Última verificação

1 de junho de 2021

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 121/2013

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever