Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

THE EFFECTS OF FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION-ASSISTED BICYCLE ERGOMETRY IN PATIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH COMPLEX REGIONAL PAIN SYNDROME.(CRPS) (CRPS)

30 aprile 2026 aggiornato da: Zeynep Nur Köseoğlu

THE EFFECTS OF FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION-ASSISTED BICYCLE ERGOMETER TRAINING ON PAIN, FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH POST-STROKE UPPER EXTREMITY COMPLEX REGIONAL PAIN SYNDROME.

The goal of this clinical study is to evaluate the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation (FES)-assisted cycling in patients with post-stroke Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Type 1. It also aims to assess its effects on pain, edema, functional status, and quality of life. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does FES-assisted cycling reduce pain levels in patients with CRPS Type 1 after stroke? Does FES-assisted cycling improve functional independence and motor recovery? Does FES-assisted cycling contribute to reductions in edema and improvements in quality of life?

Researchers will compare FES-assisted cycling in addition to conventional rehabilitation with conventional rehabilitation alone to determine whether FES provides additional therapeutic benefits.

Participants will:

Receive conventional rehabilitation treatment consisting of exercises, TENS, contrast bath, and whirlpool therapy Receive FES-assisted cycling (intervention group) or only conventional rehabilitation (control group) for a total of 20 sessions Be evaluated at baseline, at the end of treatment (4th week), and at the 12th week using clinical scales and outcome measures

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

A total of 44 patients who developed Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Type 1 in the upper extremity following a cerebrovascular event, diagnosed according to the Modified Budapest Criteria, and who were admitted to an inpatient physical therapy and rehabilitation program were included in the study. All participants met the inclusion criteria and provided written informed consent after being fully informed about the study procedures and treatment protocol. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines.

Demographic data including age, sex, height, weight, educational level, occupation, marital status, and comorbid systemic diseases were recorded for all participants. Patients with a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 23 or higher were included in the study. All participants were evaluated at baseline (pre-treatment), at the end of treatment (4th week), and at the 12th week.

Clinical assessments included evaluation of pain, edema, spasticity, range of motion, motor function, activities of daily living, and quality of life of the upper extremity. The following outcome measures were used:

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-report Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) Volumetric Measurement Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Range of Motion (ROM) Measurement Brunnstrom Motor Staging CRPS Severity Score (CSS) Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)

Eligible patients were randomized into two groups using the sealed envelope method. Both groups received a conventional neurorehabilitation program consisting of whirlpool therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), contrast bath, and therapeutic exercises.

In addition to conventional therapy, patients in the intervention group received upper extremity functional electrical stimulation (FES)-assisted cycling using a cycle ergometer. This intervention was applied for 30 minutes per day, 5 days per week, for a total of 4 weeks.

The groups were defined as follows:

Group 1: Exercise + TENS + whirlpool therapy + contrast bath + FES-assisted cycling ergometer Group 2: Exercise + TENS + whirlpool therapy + contrast bath

Tipo di studio

Osservativo

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

40

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

  • Turchia (Türkiye)
    • Çankaya
      • Ankara, Çankaya, Turchia (Türkiye), 06800
        • Ankara Bilkent City Hospital

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Bambino
  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Metodo di campionamento

Campione di probabilità

Popolazione di studio

A total of 44 patients who developed Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Type 1 in the upper extremity following a cerebrovascular event, diagnosed according to the Modified Budapest Criteria, and who were admitted to an inpatient physical therapy and rehabilitation program at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital were included in the study. All participants met the inclusion criteria and provided consent to participate.

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

History of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke Patients who experienced their first stroke within the last 1 year Diagnosis of upper extremity CRPS Type 1 according to the Modified Budapest Criteria No cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥ 23) Provision of written informed consent by the patient or their legal guardian

Exclusion Criteria:

Unstable medical condition Presence of visual impairment Presence of shoulder subluxation or contracture in the upper extremity and hand joints History of upper extremity injections within the last 6 months (e.g., suprascapular nerve block, intra-articular shoulder injections, hand/wrist intra-articular or peri-tendinous injections) History of systemic steroid use within the last 6 months Use of neuropathic pain medications within the last 6 months, including tricyclic antidepressants and gabapentinoids such as gabapentin or pregabalin Presence of neglect syndrome Presence of another etiology causing upper extremity pain Presence of another neurological disorder (e.g., progressive central nervous system disease, peripheral neuropathy) Presence of concomitant rheumatologic or orthopedic conditions in the upper extremity or hand (e.g., inflammatory arthritis, cellulitis, osteomyelitis) Presence of active deep vein thrombosis or thrombophlebitis in the upper extremity Conditions characterized by pain, swelling, and edema of the extremity, such as chronic vascular disorders Presence of malignancy History of epilepsy Presence of aphasia Pregnancy or suspicion of pregnancy

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

Coorti e interventi

Gruppo / Coorte
Intervento / Trattamento
Group 1
Exercise + TENS + whirlpool therapy + contrast bath + FES-assisted cycling ergometer
Dispositivo: Functional Electrical Stimulation
Although the FES cycling ergometer is a treatment modality used in various patient groups in neurological rehabilitation, no study has been found in the literature evaluating its effectiveness in patients with upper extremity CRPS following stroke. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of FES cycling ergometer, added to a conventional physical therapy and rehabilitation program, on pain, edema, functional status, and quality of life in patients diagnosed with post-stroke upper extremity CRPS Type 1.
Group 2
Exercise + TENS + whirlpool therapy + contrast bath

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
volumetric measurement
Lasso di tempo: All measurements were performed at baseline (pre-treatment), at the end of treatment (4th week), and at the 12th week, by the same investigator, with the patient in a seated position and at the same time of day.

The total volume of the hand was measured using a volumetric device based on the water displacement method. The volumeter method has been used since the 1950s and is considered a highly valid and reliable measurement tool with a very low margin of error. It is accepted as the "gold standard" for assessing hand edema, particularly in cases of diffuse swelling.

The patient immersed the affected extremity into the volumeter, positioning the hand so that the web space between the third and fourth fingers rested on a plastic rod. The displaced water was collected in a beaker and subsequently measured using a graduated cylinder. Measurements were recorded in milliliters.Considering that water temperature may influence measurement results, it was maintained between 20-35 °C.
All measurements were performed at baseline (pre-treatment), at the end of treatment (4th week), and at the 12th week, by the same investigator, with the patient in a seated position and at the same time of day.
visual analog scala
Lasso di tempo: Within the scope of the study, measurements were performed at baseline (pre-treatment), at the end of treatment (4th week), and at the 12th week. Pain was evaluated separately under three conditions: at rest, during movement, and at night.
Pain intensity was assessed subjectively using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Appendix 2). Participants were shown a horizontal line with the left end defined as "0 = no pain" and the right end as "10 = unbearable pain," and were asked to mark the point that best represented their current pain level. The distance from the starting point to the marked point was measured in millimeters and recorded, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
Within the scope of the study, measurements were performed at baseline (pre-treatment), at the end of treatment (4th week), and at the 12th week. Pain was evaluated separately under three conditions: at rest, during movement, and at night.

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Zeynep Nur Köseoğlu

Investigatori

  • Direttore dello studio: Güldal Funda Yüzer Nakıpoğlu, Prof. Dr., Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Pubblicazioni generali

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

15 luglio 2024

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

15 gennaio 2026

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

15 febbraio 2026

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

30 aprile 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

30 aprile 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

6 maggio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

6 maggio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

30 aprile 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 gennaio 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Parole chiave

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • TABED 1-24-352

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Descrizione del piano IPD

Data privacy

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Dolore

Prove cliniche su Functional Electrical Stimulation

Cerca prove simili

Sponsor e collaboratori

Condizioni mediche

Interventi farmacologici

CROs by country

CROs in Kosovo

Condizioni

Malattie rare

Interventi farmacologici

Supplementi dietetici

Sponsor / Collaboratori

Sedi

Sottoscrivi