- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT07570199
THE EFFECTS OF FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION-ASSISTED BICYCLE ERGOMETRY IN PATIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH COMPLEX REGIONAL PAIN SYNDROME.(CRPS) (CRPS)
THE EFFECTS OF FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION-ASSISTED BICYCLE ERGOMETER TRAINING ON PAIN, FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES, AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH POST-STROKE UPPER EXTREMITY COMPLEX REGIONAL PAIN SYNDROME.
The goal of this clinical study is to evaluate the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation (FES)-assisted cycling in patients with post-stroke Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Type 1. It also aims to assess its effects on pain, edema, functional status, and quality of life. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does FES-assisted cycling reduce pain levels in patients with CRPS Type 1 after stroke? Does FES-assisted cycling improve functional independence and motor recovery? Does FES-assisted cycling contribute to reductions in edema and improvements in quality of life?
Researchers will compare FES-assisted cycling in addition to conventional rehabilitation with conventional rehabilitation alone to determine whether FES provides additional therapeutic benefits.
Participants will:
Receive conventional rehabilitation treatment consisting of exercises, TENS, contrast bath, and whirlpool therapy Receive FES-assisted cycling (intervention group) or only conventional rehabilitation (control group) for a total of 20 sessions Be evaluated at baseline, at the end of treatment (4th week), and at the 12th week using clinical scales and outcome measures
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
A total of 44 patients who developed Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Type 1 in the upper extremity following a cerebrovascular event, diagnosed according to the Modified Budapest Criteria, and who were admitted to an inpatient physical therapy and rehabilitation program were included in the study. All participants met the inclusion criteria and provided written informed consent after being fully informed about the study procedures and treatment protocol. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines.
Demographic data including age, sex, height, weight, educational level, occupation, marital status, and comorbid systemic diseases were recorded for all participants. Patients with a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 23 or higher were included in the study. All participants were evaluated at baseline (pre-treatment), at the end of treatment (4th week), and at the 12th week.
Clinical assessments included evaluation of pain, edema, spasticity, range of motion, motor function, activities of daily living, and quality of life of the upper extremity. The following outcome measures were used:
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Self-report Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) Volumetric Measurement Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Range of Motion (ROM) Measurement Brunnstrom Motor Staging CRPS Severity Score (CSS) Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
Eligible patients were randomized into two groups using the sealed envelope method. Both groups received a conventional neurorehabilitation program consisting of whirlpool therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), contrast bath, and therapeutic exercises.
In addition to conventional therapy, patients in the intervention group received upper extremity functional electrical stimulation (FES)-assisted cycling using a cycle ergometer. This intervention was applied for 30 minutes per day, 5 days per week, for a total of 4 weeks.
The groups were defined as follows:
Group 1: Exercise + TENS + whirlpool therapy + contrast bath + FES-assisted cycling ergometer Group 2: Exercise + TENS + whirlpool therapy + contrast bath
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
Çankaya
-
Ankara, Çankaya, Turquia (Türkiye), 06800
- Ankara Bilkent City Hospital
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Filho
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Método de amostragem
População do estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
History of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke Patients who experienced their first stroke within the last 1 year Diagnosis of upper extremity CRPS Type 1 according to the Modified Budapest Criteria No cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥ 23) Provision of written informed consent by the patient or their legal guardian
Exclusion Criteria:
Unstable medical condition Presence of visual impairment Presence of shoulder subluxation or contracture in the upper extremity and hand joints History of upper extremity injections within the last 6 months (e.g., suprascapular nerve block, intra-articular shoulder injections, hand/wrist intra-articular or peri-tendinous injections) History of systemic steroid use within the last 6 months Use of neuropathic pain medications within the last 6 months, including tricyclic antidepressants and gabapentinoids such as gabapentin or pregabalin Presence of neglect syndrome Presence of another etiology causing upper extremity pain Presence of another neurological disorder (e.g., progressive central nervous system disease, peripheral neuropathy) Presence of concomitant rheumatologic or orthopedic conditions in the upper extremity or hand (e.g., inflammatory arthritis, cellulitis, osteomyelitis) Presence of active deep vein thrombosis or thrombophlebitis in the upper extremity Conditions characterized by pain, swelling, and edema of the extremity, such as chronic vascular disorders Presence of malignancy History of epilepsy Presence of aphasia Pregnancy or suspicion of pregnancy
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
Coortes e Intervenções
Grupo / Coorte |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Group 1
Exercise + TENS + whirlpool therapy + contrast bath + FES-assisted cycling ergometer
|
Although the FES cycling ergometer is a treatment modality used in various patient groups in neurological rehabilitation, no study has been found in the literature evaluating its effectiveness in patients with upper extremity CRPS following stroke.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of FES cycling ergometer, added to a conventional physical therapy and rehabilitation program, on pain, edema, functional status, and quality of life in patients diagnosed with post-stroke upper extremity CRPS Type 1.
|
|
Group 2
Exercise + TENS + whirlpool therapy + contrast bath
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
volumetric measurement
Prazo: All measurements were performed at baseline (pre-treatment), at the end of treatment (4th week), and at the 12th week, by the same investigator, with the patient in a seated position and at the same time of day.
|
The total volume of the hand was measured using a volumetric device based on the water displacement method. The volumeter method has been used since the 1950s and is considered a highly valid and reliable measurement tool with a very low margin of error. It is accepted as the "gold standard" for assessing hand edema, particularly in cases of diffuse swelling. The patient immersed the affected extremity into the volumeter, positioning the hand so that the web space between the third and fourth fingers rested on a plastic rod. The displaced water was collected in a beaker and subsequently measured using a graduated cylinder. Measurements were recorded in milliliters.Considering that water temperature may influence measurement results, it was maintained between 20-35 °C. |
All measurements were performed at baseline (pre-treatment), at the end of treatment (4th week), and at the 12th week, by the same investigator, with the patient in a seated position and at the same time of day.
|
|
visual analog scala
Prazo: Within the scope of the study, measurements were performed at baseline (pre-treatment), at the end of treatment (4th week), and at the 12th week. Pain was evaluated separately under three conditions: at rest, during movement, and at night.
|
Pain intensity was assessed subjectively using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Appendix 2).
Participants were shown a horizontal line with the left end defined as "0 = no pain" and the right end as "10 = unbearable pain," and were asked to mark the point that best represented their current pain level.
The distance from the starting point to the marked point was measured in millimeters and recorded, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
|
Within the scope of the study, measurements were performed at baseline (pre-treatment), at the end of treatment (4th week), and at the 12th week. Pain was evaluated separately under three conditions: at rest, during movement, and at night.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Diretor de estudo: Güldal Funda Yüzer Nakıpoğlu, Prof. Dr., Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- Sousa ASP, Moreira J, Silva C, Mesquita I, Macedo R, Silva A, Santos R. Usability of Functional Electrical Stimulation in Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Post-Stroke Patients: A Narrative Review. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 12;22(4):1409. doi: 10.3390/s22041409.
- Devrimsel G, Turkyilmaz AK, Yildirim M, Beyazal MS. The effects of whirlpool bath and neuromuscular electrical stimulation on complex regional pain syndrome. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jan;27(1):27-30. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.27. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
- Manifestações Neurológicas
- Distúrbios Cerebrovasculares
- Doenças Cerebrais
- Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Central
- Doenças do Sistema Nervoso
- Doenças Vasculares
- Doenças cardiovasculares
- Doenças Neuromusculares
- Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico
- Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Autônomo
- Condições Patológicas, Sinais e Sintomas
- Sinais e sintomas
- Dor
- Derrame
- Síndromes dolorosas regionais complexas
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- TABED 1-24-352
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Descrição do plano IPD
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .