Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of ThuLEP Versus ThuLEP Combined With Bladder Neck Incision in Patients With Small-Volume Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

30 giugno 2026 aggiornato da: Yifeng Jing

With the increasing degree of population aging, the number of patients undergoing surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is steadily rising. Among them, patients with small-volume prostates (≤30 mL) represent a distinct clinical subgroup.

This population has several unique characteristics:

  1. Approximately 17.5% of patients show suboptimal postoperative outcomes.
  2. The incidence of postoperative bladder neck contracture (BNC) is relatively high, reaching up to 19.3% in some reports.

In addition, the pathophysiological mechanisms of small-volume BPH are different from those of larger prostates. These include increased fibrotic tension of the bladder neck and bladder neck elevation.

At present, there is no clearly established surgical approach specifically designed to further improve postoperative outcomes or effectively prevent bladder neck contracture in patients with small-volume BPH.

This study primarily compares the safety and efficacy of transurethral thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) versus ThuLEP combined with bladder neck incision in the treatment of small-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), with the aim of further optimizing surgical management strategies for small prostates and reducing the incidence of postoperative complications.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common urological disease in middle-aged and elderly men. With the acceleration of population aging in China, the incidence of BPH is continuously increasing. Domestic epidemiological data show that the prevalence of histological BPH is approximately 20% in men aged 50-60 years, 50% in those aged 61-70 years, 57.1% in those aged 71-80 years, and 83.3% in those aged 81-90 years. BPH leads to bladder outlet obstruction and changes in lower urinary tract symptoms, thereby significantly affecting patients' quality of life, and in advanced stages may result in bladder and renal dysfunction.

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has long been regarded as the "gold standard" for the surgical management of BPH by urologists. However, its application is limited by relatively high rates of postoperative complications, including bleeding, bladder neck contracture, urethral stricture, TUR syndrome, and a considerable reoperation rate. With the development and increasing application of laser technologies in urology, laser-based procedures have demonstrated growing advantages in the treatment of BPH.

Thulium (Tm) laser is a novel medical laser technology with a wavelength range of 1.75-2.22 μm. Thulium laser technology is characterized by simplicity of operation, minimal tissue injury, excellent hemostatic capability, and high precision. In recent years, it has developed rapidly and been widely adopted in urology. Transurethral thulium laser enucleation of the prostate is considered safe and efficient, with an easy learning curve, relatively short training period, and lower procedural cost, thus demonstrating broad clinical prospects.

The pathophysiology of bladder outlet obstruction in BPH can be divided into two major components: dynamic factors (increased smooth muscle tone of the prostate) and mechanical factors (urethral compression due to prostate enlargement) . Unlike large prostates (>80 mL), in most small-volume BPH cases, mechanical compression of the posterior urethra is not the predominant cause of obstruction. Some studies suggest that the main pathophysiological mechanisms in small prostates include bladder neck fibrosis, increased fibrous ring tension, and chronic prostatitis . In addition, bladder neck elevation and an increased prostatic urethral angle are also closely associated with lower urinary tract obstruction symptoms in this population.

Based on these considerations, we propose a combined surgical approach consisting of transurethral laser enucleation of the prostate combined with bladder neck longitudinal incision. By surgically incising the bladder neck, this technique may simultaneously address both prostatic hyperplasia and bladder neck abnormalities. For patients with small prostates accompanied by bladder neck stenosis, fibrosis, or anatomical abnormalities (such as bladder neck elevation), this combined procedure may effectively correct both tissue obstruction and bladder neck dysfunction in a single stage.

Our center previously conducted a retrospective analysis on the efficacy and safety of thulium laser enucleation combined with bladder neck incision in the treatment of small-volume BPH. The study included 20 patients treated between June 2024 and December 2024. The patients were aged 63-77 years, with a mean age of 73 years. Prostate volume ranged from 19 to 29 mL, with a mean of 26 mL. All patients achieved satisfactory immediate urinary continence. With a follow-up period exceeding 12 months, no cases of bladder neck contracture were observed. The results suggest that thulium laser enucleation combined with bladder neck incision is an effective and safe treatment option for small-volume BPH.

For small-volume BPH, transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) is a guideline-recommended standard procedure. The core technique involves incision of the bladder neck and prostatic urethra, typically performed at the 5 o'clock and 7 o'clock positions, with partial resection of bladder neck tissue.

In the present study, the experimental group underwent only a single bladder neck incision at the 6 o'clock position following thulium laser enucleation. The depth of incision was consistent with that of TUIP. The incision was neither extended nor increased in number, resulting in minimal trauma to the bladder neck. Theoretically, this approach does not increase the risk of complications such as bleeding, urinary incontinence, urethral stricture, or bladder neck contracture, and is supported by sound anatomical rationale and clinical safety considerations.

This study is a multicenter, randomized, single-blind clinical trial. The study population consists of male patients aged 50-85 years who meet the diagnostic criteria for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and require surgical intervention.A centralized randomization system will be used, and 120 participants will be allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the control group and the intervention group.

Group allocation and interventions:

Intervention group (n = 60): Transurethral thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) combined with bladder neck incision.

Control group (n = 60): Transurethral thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) alone.

Study duration: Patients will be followed up until 6 months postoperatively.

Primary objective:

To evaluate the improvement of postoperative lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with small-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with transurethral thulium laser enucleation of the prostate combined with bladder neck incision.

Primary outcome measure:

The maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) at 6 months postoperatively in patients with small-volume BPH, which will also be used for sample size calculation.

Secondary objective 1:

To evaluate the safety and overall efficacy of transurethral thulium laser enucleation of the prostate combined with bladder neck incision in the treatment of small-volume BPH.

Outcome measures 1:

Perioperative vital signs; complete blood count; liver and renal function tests; serum electrolytes; and urinalysis. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications will be recorded, including severe bladder spasms, hematuria, and urinary tract injury or perforation. At 6 months postoperatively, IPSS score, post-void residual urine volume, and quality of life (QoL) will be assessed. Clinical outcomes will also include recurrence of voiding difficulty, weak urinary stream, and reduced urinary force, as well as the rates of urethral dilation, cystoscopy, and reoperation.

Secondary objective 2:

To assess the incidence of postoperative bladder neck contracture between the two groups.

Outcome measure 2:

The incidence rate of bladder neck contracture during the follow-up period in both groups.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

120

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

  • Nome: Yifeng Jing
  • Numero di telefono: +86-13918839913
  • Email: jyf_123@163.com

Luoghi di studio

    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, Cina, 200086
        • Shanghai General Hospital
        • Contatto:
        • Contatto:

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male patients aged 50-85 years who meet the diagnostic criteria for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), with a prostate volume ≤30 mL and requiring surgical intervention.
  • Preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥8.
  • Preoperative maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) ≤15 mL/s.
  • Bladder capacity ≥150 mL.
  • Willing to participate in this clinical trial and has signed the informed consent form.
  • Able to communicate well with investigators and comply with the study protocol requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with urethral stricture in whom passage of surgical instruments is not feasible.
  • Total PSA >10 ng/mL, or PSA between 4-10 ng/mL with a free-to-total PSA ratio <0.16, and confirmed malignancy on biopsy.
  • Coagulation disorders, including platelet count <80 × 10⁹/L.
  • Uncontrolled urinary tract infection.
  • Neurogenic bladder.
  • Presence of malignant tumors.
  • Urodynamic diagnosis of bladder neck sclerosis, detrusor underactivity, detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia, or unstable bladder.
  • Contraindications to surgery, such as severe cardiopulmonary disease.
  • Cognitive impairment, including senile dementia, cerebral atrophy, acute cerebrovascular disease, sequelae of cerebrovascular disease, or other conditions affecting cognitive function.
  • History of suprapubic cystostomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia.
  • Acute localized or systemic bacterial infection that has not been effectively controlled.
  • Presence of shock or other critical conditions that preclude cooperation with the procedure and outcome evaluation.
  • Psychiatric or neurological disorders preventing cooperation with the study.
  • Participation in another clinical trial within 1 month prior to enrollment.
  • Any other condition deemed inappropriate for inclusion by the investigators.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Control group
Patients in the control group will be treated with ThuLEP
This technique is one of the mainstream surgical interventions for BPH, with its safety and efficacy well established in numerous studies, and is considered a mature and well-standardized procedure.
Sperimentale: Intervention group
Patients in the intervention group will be treated with ThuLEP combined with transurethral bladder neck Incision
Bladder neck incision is also a well-established surgical approach for BPH, similar to transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP). In the experimental group of this study, after transurethral thulium laser enucleation of the prostate, a single incision was made at the 6 o'clock position of the bladder neck. The depth of the incision was consistent with that of TUIP. The incision was not extended, and no additional incisions were created, resulting in minimal injury to the bladder neck. Theoretically, this approach does not increase the risk of complications such as bleeding, urinary incontinence, urethral stricture, or bladder neck contracture, and it is supported by both sound anatomical rationale and clinical safety considerations.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Maximum flow rate (Qmax)
Lasso di tempo: The sixth month after the operation

Based on similar clinical studies, the primary efficacy endpoint was defined as the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) at 6 months postoperatively. In patients with small-volume prostates, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms commonly include bladder neck fibrosis, increased fibrotic ring tension, and chronic prostatitis. In addition, bladder neck elevation and an increased prostatic urethral angle are also closely associated with lower urinary tract obstruction symptoms in this subgroup.

In the experimental group, a combined surgical approach was applied. By performing a bladder neck incision, this technique may simultaneously address both prostatic tissue hyperplasia and bladder neck abnormalities in patients with small prostates who present with bladder neck stenosis, fibrosis, or anatomical alterations such as bladder neck elevation. Therefore, this combined approach may potentially lead to greater improvement in postoperative urinary flow parameters.

The sixth month after the operation

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
International prostate symptom score (IPSS)
Lasso di tempo: Perioperative period and 1st, 3rd, and 6th months after the operation
The minimum value is 0, and maximum values 35. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Perioperative period and 1st, 3rd, and 6th months after the operation
Quality of life score(QoL)
Lasso di tempo: Perioperative period and 1st, 3rd, and 6th months after the operation
The minimum value is 0, and maximum values 6. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Perioperative period and 1st, 3rd, and 6th months after the operation
Post-void residual urine volume (PVR)
Lasso di tempo: Perioperative period and 1st, 3rd, and 6th months after the operation
Post-void residual urine volume is a key parameter for evaluating bladder emptying function, and in adult males it is generally considered to be less than 20 mL.
Perioperative period and 1st, 3rd, and 6th months after the operation
maximum flow rate (Qmax)
Lasso di tempo: The 1st and 3rd months after the operation
As mentioned in the previous part
The 1st and 3rd months after the operation
Incidence of bladder neck contracture
Lasso di tempo: The 1st, 3rd and 6th months after the operation
In patients with small-volume benign prostatic hyperplasia, one of the major postoperative complications is bladder neck contracture, which is difficult to manage and represents a key concern in clinical practice.
The 1st, 3rd and 6th months after the operation
Complete blood count
Lasso di tempo: Within 3 days before the operation and the first day of the operation
Sample handling: discarded after use. Description: These tests are used solely for perioperative baseline assessment and safety evaluation. Blood samples were collected from veins and analyzed by the hospital's fully automatic blood analyzer. The results obtained mainly focused on the hemoglobin concentration (in g/L), which was used to assess the intraoperative bleeding of patients. All samples will be properly discarded after testing.
Within 3 days before the operation and the first day of the operation
Urinalysis
Lasso di tempo: Within 3 days before the operation and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
Sample handling: discarded after use. Description: The samples are used solely for perioperative baseline assessment and evaluation of postoperative complications. After urine samples are collected, they are analyzed by the hospital urine analyzer, mainly focusing on the number of red blood cells and white blood cells (measured in cells per μL) to determine whether the patient has obvious hematuria or urinary tract infection .All specimens will be properly discarded after testing.
Within 3 days before the operation and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Pubblicazioni generali

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 luglio 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

31 dicembre 2027

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

31 dicembre 2027

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

23 giugno 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

30 giugno 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

7 luglio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

7 luglio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

30 giugno 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 giugno 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Parole chiave

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • 2026HS172

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

Tipo di informazioni di supporto alla condivisione IPD

  • STUDIO_PROTOCOLLO
  • ICF
  • RSI

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

3
Sottoscrivi