Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Safety and Efficacy of Liposomal Amphotericin B for Patients With Invasive Mold Diseases in Liver Transplant Recipients

22 luglio 2026 aggiornato da: Beijing Friendship Hospital
Invasive mold diseases (IMD) carry extremely high mortality rates in liver transplant recipients (aspergillosis prevalence ~1.8%, mortality 60%-90%; mucormycosis prevalence ~2%, mortality 38%-95%). Guidelines emphasize early antifungal therapy: liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) is the first-line choice in liver insufficiency; voriconazole remains the gold standard for aspergillosis (but ineffective against mucormycosis), yet its use is limited by significant drug-drug interactions-requiring a 50%-60% dose reduction of calcineurin inhibitors and contraindicated with sirolimus-thereby increasing the risk of graft rejection. Currently, no head-to-head clinical trials compare voriconazole and L-AmB in liver transplant recipients with IMD. Therefore, a prospective real-world study is planned to generate robust data to support updates to international or Chinese guidelines.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Non ancora reclutamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Invasive mold diseases (IMD) represent a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Liver transplant recipients are at heightened risk for developing IMD due to complex biliary-enteric anastomosis and underlying immunological deficits associated with liver dysfunction and the need for immunosuppressive therapy. Among SOT patients, invasive aspergillosis is the second most common invasive fungal infection and poses a substantial mortality risk, especially for those who have undergone liver transplantation. Current research indicates that 1.8% of liver transplant recipients develop invasive aspergillosis, with mortality rates reported between 60% and 90%.

While mucormycosis is less prevalent than invasive aspergillosis-accounting for approximately 2% of fungal infections in SOT recipients-it is associated with a poor prognosis, with mortality rates ranging from 38% to 95% in this population. These statistics highlight the critical need for effective antifungal therapies in the management of IMD among liver transplant patients.

Guidance from the 2019 American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice (ASTIDCOP) underscores the importance of early antifungal therapy initiation to optimize outcomes for SOT recipients affected by invasive aspergillosis. The primary antifungal drug classes used for treating invasive aspergillosis include polyenes, triazoles, and echinocandins. In the context of liver insufficiency, liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) is typically considered the first-line therapeutic option.

For mucormycosis, the 2019 guidelines from the European Confederation of Medical Mycology (ECMM) and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (MSGERC) recommend liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) as the first-line treatment. However, there are currently no international guidelines specifically addressing the management of mucormycosis in solid organ transplant recipients.

Voriconazole remains the preferred agent for treating invasive aspergillosis and is considered the standard of care. Lipid formulations of L-AmB are regarded as alternative treatment options for invasive aspergillosis. However, voriconazole is not recommended for the treatment of mucormycosis. Although voriconazole, a triazole antifungal agent, offers broad-spectrum activity against various yeast and mold species and is the current gold standard for invasive aspergillosis, its use is constrained by drug-drug interactions and safety concerns.

Liver function has a significant impact on the pharmacokinetics of antifungal agents, which is particularly relevant in liver transplant recipients. Both cyclosporine and tacrolimus are extensively metabolized by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5, necessitating a 50% to 60% reduction in the dosage of these calcineurin inhibitors when administered with voriconazole. The coadministration of voriconazole with sirolimus is contraindicated. Reducing the dose of immunosuppressive agents may increase the risk of graft rejection, presenting a therapeutic challenge in this patient population.

No direct head-to-head clinical trials have compared voriconazole and AmBisome for treating invasive mold infections in liver transplant recipients, especially regarding adverse reactions. This prospective, bigger scale, real-world study aims to fill the gap by evaluating both drugs such as IMD patients with liver transplantation to facilitate robust scientific data support for updated international or Chinese guideline

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

60

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Bambino
  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients aged ≥12 years. Liver transplant recipients. Proven or probable invasive mold disease (IMD) according to the 2020 EORTC/MSGERC criteria.

Have received at least one dose of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) or voriconazole.

Exclusion Criteria:

History of invasive mold disease previously treated with amphotericin B for more than 5 days.

Documented hypersensitivity or allergy to amphotericin B formulations. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score >15. Expected survival <72 hours. Pregnant or breastfeeding. Patients who, in the investigator's judgment, are unable to complete the study treatment or follow the study protocol.

Recipients of combined organ transplantation or multivisceral transplantation.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: N / A
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione di gruppo singolo
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: evaluate the safety of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in liver transplant recipients with IMD
This study aims to describe the safety profiles and clinical characteristics of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) or voriconazole as first-line therapies for invasive mold disease (IMD) in liver transplant recipients, utilizing historical matched-control analysis across 10 study sites. Specifically, a 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) method will be applied to compare the prospectively enrolled AmBisome group (60 patients) with a historical voriconazole group (120 patients). The primary safety endpoints include: nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, hypokalemia, cardiotoxicity (QT interval changes), infusion-related reactions, tacrolimus dose and trough concentration changes, and treatment-related serious adverse events leading to discontinuation or death (graded per CTCAE v5.0).
This intervention is applied prospectively to the AmBisome group (target enrollment: 60 patients). The study does not mandate a fixed dose or fixed course length; rather, it reflects real-world clinical practice. All safety parameters (hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, hypokalemia, cardiotoxicity, infusion reactions, tacrolimus dose/concentration changes, and serious adverse events) are longitudinally monitored during the intervention period.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
The primary endpoint of this study is the safety profile of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in liver transplant recipients with invasive mold disease
Lasso di tempo: The comprehensive assessment for the primary safety endpoint will be performed at Week 6 (±7 days) after the initiation of antifungal therapy. If a patient prematurely discontinues treatment for any reason, the assessment time point will be at the time o
The primary endpoint of this study is to comprehensively evaluate the safety profile of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) in liver transplant recipients diagnosed with invasive mold disease (IMD). Safety will be assessed by systematically monitoring the incidence, severity, timing, and outcomes of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring during and after AmBisome therapy. Particular attention will be paid to adverse events of special interest associated with amphotericin B treatment, including nephrotoxicity, electrolyte disturbances (such as hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia), infusion-related reactions, hepatotoxicity, hematologic abnormalities, and other clinically significant laboratory abnormalities.
The comprehensive assessment for the primary safety endpoint will be performed at Week 6 (±7 days) after the initiation of antifungal therapy. If a patient prematurely discontinues treatment for any reason, the assessment time point will be at the time o

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

8 agosto 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

15 maggio 2028

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

15 agosto 2028

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

9 luglio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

22 luglio 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

24 luglio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

24 luglio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

22 luglio 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 giugno 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

prodotto fabbricato ed esportato dagli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi