Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large Vessel Occlusion With Ultra-Large Ischemic Core (LARGE CORE-MT)

25 agosto 2026 aggiornato da: First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University

Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large Vessel Occlusion With Ultra-Large Ischemic Core: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Blinded Endpoint Trial (LARGE CORE-MT)

an investigator initiated, prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trial (PROBE)

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Non ancora reclutamento

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

The primary objective is to determine whether EVT combined with BMM, compared with BMM alone, improves functional outcome in patients with intracranial LVO in anterior circulation and ultra large-core treated within 24 hours of symptom onset.

Primary Efficacy Endpoint Analysis The primary efficacy endpoint is the mRS score at 90 days after randomization. The proportional odds assumption will be formally assessed. If this assumption holds (score test p-value > 0.05), the primary effect measure is the common odds ratio (cOR), which will be estimated using an ordinal logistic regression model to assess the shift in the overall distribution of the mRS scale at 90 days. The model will be adjusted for known prognostic factors including baseline ASPECTS score, age, NIHSS score at admission, and intravenous thrombolysis, as well as the randomization stratification factor, i.e., time from stroke onset or last known well to randomization (≤6 hours vs. >6 hours). Unadjusted cOR estimates and confidence intervals (CI) will also be reported. If the assumption is violated, the generalized odds ratio (GenOR) and its 95% CI will be derived as a robust alternative measure of treatment effect.

Secondary Efficacy Endpoints Analysis For the secondary endpoint of mRS score at 180 days after randomization, the same analysis method as for the primary endpoint will be used. For the proportions of mRS 0-2 and mRS 0-3 at 90 days and 180 days, early neurological improvement, a modified Poisson regression model will be used, reporting Risk Ratio and 95% CI, with the same adjustment factors as in the primary endpoint analysis. For the comparison of EQ-5D-5L score at 90 days between two arms, a linear regression model will be used to estimate the mean difference and 95% CI. For the change in infarct volume from baseline assessed by NCCT at 7 (±1) days or discharge (whichever occurs earlier), or by MRI at 36 (±12) hours after randomization, a linear regression model will be used to estimate the mean difference and 95% CI, with treatment group as the study variable and baseline measurement as a covariate; if normality assumptions are violated, the win ratio method will be used.

Safety Analysis For the primary safety endpoint of all-cause mortality within 90 days after randomization, the Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test will be used for between-group comparison. For the secondary safety endpoints, including incidence of sICH within 24 hours from onset, proportion of early neurological deterioration, procedure- or device-related complications, and serious adverse events adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee, data summary will be performed by treatment group.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

450

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Luoghi di studio

  • Cina
    • Hei Longjiang
      • Harbin, Hei Longjiang, Cina, 150001
        • he First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
        • Contatto:
        • Investigatore principale:
          • Huaizhang SHi, M.D., Ph.D.

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

No

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥18 years.
  2. Symptoms onset or Time last known well ≤ 24 h from randomization.
  3. Acute ischemic stroke due to an occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery, M1 or proximal M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery confirmed by CTA or MRA.
  4. NCCT or diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) demonstrating ASPECTS ≤ 2 or infarct core volume (defined as rCBF <30% on CTP) ≥ 100 mL.
  5. Selection imaging performed ≤ 3 hours before randomization.
  6. Pre-stroke mRS 0 - 1.
  7. Informed consent form was signed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Evidence of intracranial hemorrhage on CT/MRI, including intraparenchymal hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or subdural/epidural hemorrhage.
  2. Cerebral midline shift or herniation, or other ventricular mass effect with midline shift as confirmed on CT/MRI.
  3. Bilateral anterior circulation or acute multi-vessel occlusion involving both anterior and posterior circulation, confirmed by CTA or MRA.
  4. Blood pressure >185/110 mmHg and is refractory to medicine.
  5. Known coagulopathy, with international normalized ratio (INR) >1.7 or platelet count <100×10⁹/L;
  6. Current treatment with direct thrombin inhibitors or factor Xa inhibitors;
  7. Patients with severe organ failure (cardiac, pulmonary, renal, or hepatic);
  8. Concomitant malignancy or other conditions with life expectancy under 6 months;
  9. Female who is known to be pregnant;
  10. Prior endovascular attempt for this stroke;;
  11. Currently participation in another clinical study;
  12. Other circumstances that the investigator considers inappropriate for participation.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: EVT group
Procedura: Patients assigned to the EVT group should undergo EVT as soon as possible, followed by BMM according to the current EVT guidelines.
EVT should be performed as soon as possible in patients randomized to the EVT group. Investigators and clinicians should make every effort to minimize delays related to pre-procedural preparation, with a target interval of no more than 60 minutes from randomization to arterial puncture. EVT in the EVT group can be performed with any thrombectomy device (NMPA approved) usually used at study site.
Comparatore attivo: Medical group
Droga: The medical group receives BMM alone. EVT is not performed in the medical group.
The administration of medications is at the treating physician's discretion (for example intravenous fibrinolysis, anticoagulants or antiplatelet) according to current AIS management guidelines but may NOT include any intra-arterial therapies.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Lasso di tempo
The primary efficacy endpoint is the mRS score at 90 days after randomization.
Lasso di tempo: at 90 days after randomization.
at 90 days after randomization.

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Lasso di tempo
mRS score at 180 days after randomization.
Lasso di tempo: at 180 days after randomization.
at 180 days after randomization.
Proportion of mRS 0-2 at 90 days and 180 days after randomization.
Lasso di tempo: at 90 days and 180 days after randomization.
at 90 days and 180 days after randomization.
Proportion of mRS 0-3 at 90 days and 180 days after randomization.
Lasso di tempo: at 90 days and 180 days after randomization.
at 90 days and 180 days after randomization.
Proportion of early neurological improvement
Lasso di tempo: at day 7 (±1) or discharge (whichever is earlier).
at day 7 (±1) or discharge (whichever is earlier).
Infarct volume change from baseline NCCT at 7 (±1) days after randomization or discharge (whichever is earlier), or by MRI at 36 (±12) hours.
Lasso di tempo: at 7 (±1) days after randomization or discharge (whichever is earlier), or by MRI at 36 (±12) hours.
at 7 (±1) days after randomization or discharge (whichever is earlier), or by MRI at 36 (±12) hours.
EQ-5D-5L score at 90 days.
Lasso di tempo: at 90 days.
at 90 days.

Altre misure di risultato

Misura del risultato
Lasso di tempo
Incidence of all-cause mortality within 90 days after randomization.
Lasso di tempo: within 90 days after randomization.
within 90 days after randomization.
Incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH, per Heidelberg Bleeding Classification) at 24±12 hours from onset.
Lasso di tempo: at 24±12 hours from onset.
at 24±12 hours from onset.
Incidence of early neurological deterioration
Lasso di tempo: defined as a NIHSS increase ≥ 10 points at day 7 (±1) or discharge (whichever is earlier). Death within 7 days of onset is directly judged as neurological deterioration.
defined as a NIHSS increase ≥ 10 points at day 7 (±1) or discharge (whichever is earlier). Death within 7 days of onset is directly judged as neurological deterioration.
Procedure- or device-related complications
Lasso di tempo: perioperative period
perioperative period
Serious adverse events (SAE) adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee.
Lasso di tempo: within 180 days after randomization
within 180 days after randomization

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Huaizhang Shi, MD, PhD, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, China
  • Investigatore principale: Wei Hu, MD, PhD, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (Anhui Provincial Hospital), China
  • Investigatore principale: Jianmin Liu, MD, PhD, Changhai Hospital, China

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

18 settembre 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

18 aprile 2028

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

18 aprile 2028

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

25 agosto 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

25 agosto 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

28 agosto 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

28 agosto 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

25 agosto 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 agosto 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Parole chiave

Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • LARGE CORE-MT

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

SÌ

Descrizione del piano IPD

Data may be shared with bona fide researchers following publication of the main results, upon receipt of a protocol submitted to the LARGE CORE-MT Steering Committee.

Periodo di condivisione IPD

Data sharing will be available from 12 months after the publication of the main results.

Criteri di accesso alla condivisione IPD

  1. The data sharing will be only for the purposes of health and medical research and within the constraints of the consent under which the data were originally gathered.
  2. The Custodian of the Collection will not consider any Proposals for data sharing that unblind, or potentially unblind, randomised comparisons in active / ongoing trials.
  3. Requesters should be employees of a recognised academic institution, health service organisation, commercial research organisation or from the pharmaceutical industry. Requesters must have experience in medical research.
  4. Requesters must be able to demonstrate through their peer review publications in the area of interest their ability to carry out the proposed use of the requested dataset from a Collection.
  5. The Requesters must not have a conflict of interest that may potentially influence their interpretation of any analyses.

Tipo di informazioni di supporto alla condivisione IPD

  • STUDIO_PROTOCOLLO
  • LINFA

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi