Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Xbox-Based Exergames Versus Structured Home-Based Cognitive Training for Attention and Executive Functions in Healthy Adults

2 settembre 2026 aggiornato da: Halime Avunc, Medipol University
Background: Exergames are increasingly used to support cognition in older adults; however, evidence comparing exergames with non-computerized cognitive training in healthy adults remains limited. Objective: This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the effects of Xbox-based exergames and structured home-based cognitive training on attention and executive functions in healthy adults. Methods: Twenty healthy adults aged ≥50 years were randomly allocated to either an Xbox-based exergames group (n=10) or a structured home-based cognitive training group (n=10). Both groups received 12 sessions twice weekly. Before and after the intervention, participants were assessed using the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination, d2 Test of Attention, Stroop Test, WMS-R Digit Span Test, Trail Making Test, and Benton Judgment of Line Orientation Test.

Panoramica dello studio

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

20

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • Istanbul
      • Beykoz, Istanbul, Turchia (Türkiye)
        • Istanbul Medipol University

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Adulto
  • Adulto più anziano

Accetta volontari sani

Sì

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being 50 years of age or older
  • Obtaining a score of 24-30 on the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score ≥9
  • A Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score ≤40
  • A history of head trauma
  • A diagnosis of a psychiatric or neurodegenerative disorder
  • A history of alcohol dependence
  • The presence of any physical illness

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Scienza basilare
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Xbox-based exergames intervention group
The intervention was delivered using the Microsoft Xbox 360 Kinect™ as a non-VR exergaming platform. The Kinect system detects and tracks participants' body movements in real time without requiring a handheld controller. Exergames were selected by the researchers (DT, HA, and MK) based on their cognitive demands and relevance to the targeted cognitive functions. The selected games were incorporated into a predetermined intervention session plan. Before the intervention, each game was demonstrated once to familiarize participants with the gameplay and required movements. All games started at a basic level, and progression to advanced levels was determined by the therapists according to each participant's performance. Game levels and repetition numbers were individually adjusted to ensure appropriate progression throughout the intervention. The Xbox-based exergames group received 12 sessions twice weekly.
Comparatore attivo: Structured home-based cognitive training group

The structured home-based cognitive training program consisted of tasks specifically designed to improve different cognitive skills. The program included cognitive activities such as mathematical sequences, identifying differences between two pictures, finding missing objects, pattern completion, Sudoku, and maze completion. Taken together, these tasks provided a comprehensive and individualized program aimed at strengthening fundamental cognitive skills such as attention, EFs, spatial orientation, and visuomotor coordination.

The cognitive tasks included in the structured home-based cognitive training program and their targeted parameters were specified, and the activities were explained to the participants once before implementation. The cognitive tasks and homework assignments were planned and adjusted based on the participants' initial assessment findings and in accordance with their individual performance capacities. This groups also received 12 sessions twice weekly.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
The SMMSE is a brief 30-item cognitive screening tool that assesses attention, memory, orientation, language, and visuospatial abilities. The Turkish validity and reliability of the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) were established by Güngen et al. (2002). In the Turkish version, a cutoff score of 23/24 has been established for dementia.
Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
d2 Test of Attention
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
The d2 Test assesses sustained and selective attention, visual scanning, and mental concentration. The d2 Test of Attention consists of 14 rows, each containing 47 characters/items. Each row includes lowercase "p" and "d" letters accompanied by one to four marks positioned above or below the letters. Participants are required to identify and mark the letter "d" accompanied by two marks within a time limit of 20 seconds for each row. Scoring is based on the total number of items processed (TN), errors of omission (E1), errors of commission (E2), and concentration performance (CP). Higher TN and CP scores indicate better attentional performance, whereas higher E1 and E2 scores indicate a greater number of errors.
Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
Stroop Test
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
The Stroop Test is a neuropsychological measure of selective attention, inhibitory control, processing speed, and cognitive flexibility. The Stroop Test Çapa Version consists of three parts: Stroop A, in which participants name the colors of colored rectangles; Stroop B, in which they read color words printed in incongruent ink colors; and Stroop C, in which they name the ink color while inhibiting the tendency to read the word. Completion time is recorded for each part. In the present study, the Stroop Test Interference Time Difference was calculated by subtracting the completion time of Stroop B from that of Stroop C. The Turkish validity and reliability of the Stroop Test Çapa Version were established by Emek-Savaş et al.
Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
WMS-R Digit Span Test (DST)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
The Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) assesses attention, short-term memory, and working memory. It consists of Forward and Backward Digit Span conditions, in which participants repeat progressively longer digit sequences in the presented or reverse order, respectively. Each sequence length includes two trials, and the respective condition is discontinued when both trials are answered incorrectly. The Turkish standardization of the WMS-R has been established, and normative data are available for the Digit Span Test in Turkish adults aged 50-83 years.
Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
The Trail Making Test (TMT)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
The Trail Making Test (TMT) consists of two parts, TMT-A and TMT-B. TMT-A primarily assesses visual scanning, attention, and processing speed, whereas TMT-B additionally requires cognitive flexibility, set-shifting, working memory, and inhibitory control. The basic scores for TMT-A and TMT-B are completion times in seconds, with longer completion times indicating poorer performance. The Turkish validity and reliability of the Trail Making Test were established.
Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
Benton Judgment of Line Orientation Test
Lasso di tempo: Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
The Benton Judgment of Line Orientation Test was developed by Benton et al. (1978), and its Turkish standardization was conducted within the BİLNOT battery. The Benton Judgment of Line Orientation Test (BJLOT) is a neuropsychological measure of visuospatial perception and spatial orientation. The test assesses the ability to perceive and identify angular relationships between lines and comprises five practice items followed by 30 test items. Each correct response is scored as one point, yielding a maximum score of 30, with higher scores indicating better visuospatial performance.
Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Direttore dello studio: Halime Avunç, PhD Candidate, Medipol University
  • Investigatore principale: Ayşe Seren Taner, Occupational Therapist, Medipol University
  • Investigatore principale: Eylül Eşin, Occupational Therapist, Medipol University
  • Investigatore principale: Zeynep Demir, Occupational Therapist, Medipol University
  • Cattedra di studio: Merve Keskin, PhD Candidate, Medipol University
  • Cattedra di studio: Devrim Tarakcı, Prof. Dr., Medipol University

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

8 aprile 2025

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

16 maggio 2025

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

23 maggio 2025

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

28 agosto 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

2 settembre 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

9 settembre 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

9 settembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

2 settembre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 marzo 2025

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • E-10840098-202.3.02-1964

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi