Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Xbox-Based Exergames Versus Structured Home-Based Cognitive Training for Attention and Executive Functions in Healthy Adults

2 de setembro de 2026 atualizado por: Halime Avunc, Medipol University
Background: Exergames are increasingly used to support cognition in older adults; however, evidence comparing exergames with non-computerized cognitive training in healthy adults remains limited. Objective: This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the effects of Xbox-based exergames and structured home-based cognitive training on attention and executive functions in healthy adults. Methods: Twenty healthy adults aged ≥50 years were randomly allocated to either an Xbox-based exergames group (n=10) or a structured home-based cognitive training group (n=10). Both groups received 12 sessions twice weekly. Before and after the intervention, participants were assessed using the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination, d2 Test of Attention, Stroop Test, WMS-R Digit Span Test, Trail Making Test, and Benton Judgment of Line Orientation Test.

Visão geral do estudo

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

20

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Istanbul
      • Beykoz, Istanbul, Turquia (Türkiye)
        • Istanbul Medipol University

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being 50 years of age or older
  • Obtaining a score of 24-30 on the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) score ≥9
  • A Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score ≤40
  • A history of head trauma
  • A diagnosis of a psychiatric or neurodegenerative disorder
  • A history of alcohol dependence
  • The presence of any physical illness

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Ciência básica
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Xbox-based exergames intervention group
The intervention was delivered using the Microsoft Xbox 360 Kinect™ as a non-VR exergaming platform. The Kinect system detects and tracks participants' body movements in real time without requiring a handheld controller. Exergames were selected by the researchers (DT, HA, and MK) based on their cognitive demands and relevance to the targeted cognitive functions. The selected games were incorporated into a predetermined intervention session plan. Before the intervention, each game was demonstrated once to familiarize participants with the gameplay and required movements. All games started at a basic level, and progression to advanced levels was determined by the therapists according to each participant's performance. Game levels and repetition numbers were individually adjusted to ensure appropriate progression throughout the intervention. The Xbox-based exergames group received 12 sessions twice weekly.
Comparador Ativo: Structured home-based cognitive training group

The structured home-based cognitive training program consisted of tasks specifically designed to improve different cognitive skills. The program included cognitive activities such as mathematical sequences, identifying differences between two pictures, finding missing objects, pattern completion, Sudoku, and maze completion. Taken together, these tasks provided a comprehensive and individualized program aimed at strengthening fundamental cognitive skills such as attention, EFs, spatial orientation, and visuomotor coordination.

The cognitive tasks included in the structured home-based cognitive training program and their targeted parameters were specified, and the activities were explained to the participants once before implementation. The cognitive tasks and homework assignments were planned and adjusted based on the participants' initial assessment findings and in accordance with their individual performance capacities. This groups also received 12 sessions twice weekly.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE)
Prazo: Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
The SMMSE is a brief 30-item cognitive screening tool that assesses attention, memory, orientation, language, and visuospatial abilities. The Turkish validity and reliability of the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (SMMSE) were established by Güngen et al. (2002). In the Turkish version, a cutoff score of 23/24 has been established for dementia.
Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
d2 Test of Attention
Prazo: Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
The d2 Test assesses sustained and selective attention, visual scanning, and mental concentration. The d2 Test of Attention consists of 14 rows, each containing 47 characters/items. Each row includes lowercase "p" and "d" letters accompanied by one to four marks positioned above or below the letters. Participants are required to identify and mark the letter "d" accompanied by two marks within a time limit of 20 seconds for each row. Scoring is based on the total number of items processed (TN), errors of omission (E1), errors of commission (E2), and concentration performance (CP). Higher TN and CP scores indicate better attentional performance, whereas higher E1 and E2 scores indicate a greater number of errors.
Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
Stroop Test
Prazo: Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
The Stroop Test is a neuropsychological measure of selective attention, inhibitory control, processing speed, and cognitive flexibility. The Stroop Test Çapa Version consists of three parts: Stroop A, in which participants name the colors of colored rectangles; Stroop B, in which they read color words printed in incongruent ink colors; and Stroop C, in which they name the ink color while inhibiting the tendency to read the word. Completion time is recorded for each part. In the present study, the Stroop Test Interference Time Difference was calculated by subtracting the completion time of Stroop B from that of Stroop C. The Turkish validity and reliability of the Stroop Test Çapa Version were established by Emek-Savaş et al.
Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
WMS-R Digit Span Test (DST)
Prazo: Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
The Digit Span Subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised (WMS-R) assesses attention, short-term memory, and working memory. It consists of Forward and Backward Digit Span conditions, in which participants repeat progressively longer digit sequences in the presented or reverse order, respectively. Each sequence length includes two trials, and the respective condition is discontinued when both trials are answered incorrectly. The Turkish standardization of the WMS-R has been established, and normative data are available for the Digit Span Test in Turkish adults aged 50-83 years.
Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
The Trail Making Test (TMT)
Prazo: Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
The Trail Making Test (TMT) consists of two parts, TMT-A and TMT-B. TMT-A primarily assesses visual scanning, attention, and processing speed, whereas TMT-B additionally requires cognitive flexibility, set-shifting, working memory, and inhibitory control. The basic scores for TMT-A and TMT-B are completion times in seconds, with longer completion times indicating poorer performance. The Turkish validity and reliability of the Trail Making Test were established.
Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
Benton Judgment of Line Orientation Test
Prazo: Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention
The Benton Judgment of Line Orientation Test was developed by Benton et al. (1978), and its Turkish standardization was conducted within the BİLNOT battery. The Benton Judgment of Line Orientation Test (BJLOT) is a neuropsychological measure of visuospatial perception and spatial orientation. The test assesses the ability to perceive and identify angular relationships between lines and comprises five practice items followed by 30 test items. Each correct response is scored as one point, yielding a maximum score of 30, with higher scores indicating better visuospatial performance.
Baseline and 1 week after completion of the 12-session intervention

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Diretor de estudo: Halime Avunç, PhD Candidate, Medipol University
  • Investigador principal: Ayşe Seren Taner, Occupational Therapist, Medipol University
  • Investigador principal: Eylül Eşin, Occupational Therapist, Medipol University
  • Investigador principal: Zeynep Demir, Occupational Therapist, Medipol University
  • Cadeira de estudo: Merve Keskin, PhD Candidate, Medipol University
  • Cadeira de estudo: Devrim Tarakcı, Prof. Dr., Medipol University

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

8 de abril de 2025

Conclusão Primária (Real)

16 de maio de 2025

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

23 de maio de 2025

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

28 de agosto de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

2 de setembro de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

9 de setembro de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

9 de setembro de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

2 de setembro de 2026

Última verificação

1 de março de 2025

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • E-10840098-202.3.02-1964

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever