Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Video Modeling on Shot-Put Acquisition

28 settembre 2026 aggiornato da: Nejmeddine Ouerghi, High Institute of Sports and Physical Education of Kef

Video Modeling Variants and Temporal Scheduling Effects on Shot-Put Acquisition

Video modeling is widely used in motor skill instruction, yet its optimal modality and timing within a session remain unclear, particularly for complex athletic tasks. This study compared three video feedback modalities, including video self-modeling, video expert-modeling, and peer-to-peer learning video, administered at three session phases (warm-up, during the learning session, and after the learning session) on shot-put learning outcomes in novice university students. Sport science students aged 19-25 years were assigned to nine experimental groups and one control group in a 3 × 3 between-subjects factorial randomized controlled trial over nine weeks. Physical performance, technical score, selective attention, and episodic memory were assessed at three time points: the predictive session test (week 1), formative session test (week 5), and summative session test (week 9).

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

Video modeling is widely used in motor skill instruction, yet the optimal video modality and timing within a training session remain unclear, particularly for complex athletic skills. This study compared three video-based learning modalities, including video self-modeling, video expert-modeling, and peer-to-peer learning video, administered at three different phases of a training session (during the warm-up, during the learning session, or after the learning session) on shot-put learning outcomes in novice university students. A total of 176 university students (122 males and 54 females) participated in the study. Participants were allocated to 10 groups, consisting of one control group and nine experimental groups, with group sizes ranging from 16 to 20 participants. The groups were based on existing administrative classes. The 10 groups were: (1) control group (n = 20); (2) peer-to-peer learning video during warm-up (n = 19); (3) video expert-modeling during warm-up (n = 17); (4) video self-modeling during warm-up (n = 17); (5) peer-to-peer learning video during the learning session (n = 16); (6) video expert-modeling during the learning session (n = 17); (7) video self-modeling during the learning session (n = 17); (8) peer-to-peer learning video after the learning session (n = 19); (9) video expert-modeling after the learning session (n = 17); and (10) video self-modeling after the learning session (n = 17). Shot-put learning outcomes were assessed using physical performance (throwing distance), technical performance score, release velocity, selective attention, and episodic memory. Assessments were conducted at three time points: the predictive session test at week 1, the formative session test at week 5, and the summative session test at week 9.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

176

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • Boulifa
      • El Kef, Boulifa, Tunisia, 7100
        • Nejmeddine Ouerghi

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

Da 19 anni a 25 anni (Adulto)

Accetta volontari sani

Sì

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 19-25 years.
  • Enrolled as a sport science student.
  • No prior competitive experience in shot put.
  • Regularly engaged in sports practice for approximately 6 hours per week.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of musculoskeletal injury affecting upper-limb or trunk function
  • Sustaining a neuromuscular or sensorimotor injury during the experimental protocol
  • Absence from more than two learning sessions.

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Altro
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Peer-to-peer learning video group during warm-up

Student pairs analyzed their own recorded videos during the warm-up in each learning session over 9 weeks.

Student pairs analyzed their own recorded videos for 5 minutes at a time that differed according to the condition: during the warm-up phase in each learning session (post-warm-up transition interval), during the learning session (the final shot-put simulation exercise), or after the learning session (the cool-down phase).

Sperimentale: Video expert modeling group during warm-up

Each student viewed an expert-modeling video for 5 minutes during the warm-up phase in each learning session over 9 weeks.

Students watched a video demonstration of the shot put by an expert during 5-min, at a time that differed according to the condition: during warm-up phase (post-warm-up transition interval), during the session (the final shot-put simulation exercise), or after the learning session (the cool-down phase).

Sperimentale: Video self-modeling group during warm-up

Each student viewed their own video for 5 minutes during the warm-up phase in each learning session over 9 weeks.

Student pairs analyzed their own recorded videos for 5 minutes at a time that differed according to the condition: during the warm-up phase in each learning session (post-warm-up transition interval), during the learning session (the final shot-put simulation exercise), or after the learning session (the cool-down phase).

Sperimentale: Peer-to-peer learning video group during learning

Student pairs analyzed their own recorded videos during the learning phase in each session over 9 weeks.

Student pairs analyzed their own recorded videos for 5 minutes at a time that differed according to the condition: during the warm-up phase in each learning session (post-warm-up transition interval), during the learning session (the final shot-put simulation exercise), or after the learning session (the cool-down phase).

Sperimentale: Video expert modeling group during learning

Each student viewed an expert-modeling video for 5 minutes during the learning phase in each session over 9 weeks.

Students watched a video demonstration of the shot put by an expert during 5-min, at a time that differed according to the condition: during warm-up phase (post-warm-up transition interval), during the session (the final shot-put simulation exercise), or after the learning session (the cool-down phase).

Sperimentale: Video self-modeling group during learning

Each student viewed their own video for 5 minutes during the learning phase in each session over 9 weeks.

Student pairs analyzed their own recorded videos for 5 minutes at a time that differed according to the condition: during the warm-up phase in each learning session (post-warm-up transition interval), during the learning session (the final shot-put simulation exercise), or after the learning session (the cool-down phase).

Sperimentale: Peer-to-peer learning video group after learning

Student pairs analyzed their own recorded videos after the learning phase in each session over 9 weeks.

Student pairs analyzed their own recorded videos for 5 minutes at a time that differed according to the condition: during the warm-up phase in each learning session (post-warm-up transition interval), during the learning session (the final shot-put simulation exercise), or after the learning session (the cool-down phase).

Sperimentale: Video expert modeling group after learning

Each student viewed an expert-modeling video for 5 minutes after the learning phase in each session over 9 weeks.

Students watched a video demonstration of the shot put by an expert during 5-min, at a time that differed according to the condition: during warm-up phase (post-warm-up transition interval), during the session (the final shot-put simulation exercise), or after the learning session (the cool-down phase).

Sperimentale: Video self-modeling group after learning

Each student viewed their own video for 5 minutes after the learning phase in each session over 9 weeks.

Student pairs analyzed their own recorded videos for 5 minutes at a time that differed according to the condition: during the warm-up phase in each learning session (post-warm-up transition interval), during the learning session (the final shot-put simulation exercise), or after the learning session (the cool-down phase).

Comparatore attivo: Control group

Participants in the control group maintained their normal learning activities in physical education.

The same shot-put learning program was implemented without the use of video-based learning.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Shot-put throwing distance (m)
Lasso di tempo: Week 1, Week 5, and Week 9

The distance of the shot-put throw, measured in meters. The best performance across three trials at each assessment was used for analysis

Week 1, Week 5, and Week 9
Shot-put technical execution score
Lasso di tempo: Week 1, Week 5, and Week 9

Technical execution was assessed by two independent raters using a standardized evaluation grid covering five phases of the throw: preparation, push, inclination, extension, and follow-through. Each phase was rated on a three-point scale (1 = not achieved, 2 = partially achieved, 3 = fully achieved), yielding a total score ranging from 5 to 15 points. The mean score across the three trials at each assessment was used for analysis

Week 1, Week 5, and Week 9
Shot-put release velocity (m/s)
Lasso di tempo: Week 1, Week 5, and Week 9

Shot release velocity, expressed in m/s, was determined from video recordings using Kinovea motion analysis software

Week 1, Week 5, and Week 9

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Go/No-Go response time (ms)
Lasso di tempo: Week 1, Week 5, and Week 9

Response time during Go trials was recorded in milliseconds using the Go/No-Go task administered through the CogniFit online cognitive assessment platform.

Week 1, Week 5, and Week 9
Go/No-Go inhibitory control accuracy (%)
Lasso di tempo: Week 1, Week 5, and Week 9

Inhibitory control was assessed using the Go/No-Go task. Accuracy during No-Go trials was recorded as the percentage of correct responses using the CogniFit online cognitive assessment platform.

Week 1, Week 5, and Week 9
d2 attention test performance
Lasso di tempo: Week 1, Week 5, and Week 9

The d2 attention test was used to assess selective attention by requiring participants to identify target stimuli among distracting stimuli within a limited time. The percentage of correct responses and the total time required to complete the task, measured in milliseconds, were recorded at each assessment.

Week 1, Week 5, and Week 9

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Nejmeddine Ouerghi, Research Unit "Sport Sciences, Health and Movement"(UR22JS01) High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Kef, University of Jendouba, 7100 Kef, Tunisia.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

1 aprile 2026

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

17 giugno 2026

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

17 giugno 2026

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

22 settembre 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

28 settembre 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

30 settembre 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

30 settembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

28 settembre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 settembre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

NO

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi