Benefits of the Involvement of Nurses in Meetings Between Physicians and the Families of Patients in the ICU. (NEWS)
When a patient is admitted to the ICU this often happens so suddenly that this can create a significant amount of stress and anxiety for family members for several reasons. Firstly, the family does not have a pre existing relationship with the ICU team. Secondly, the urgency of the situation and the technic it requires is often such that minimal information can be given to family members. And finally, as a result of the unpredictability of each patient's condition, it can be difficult to predict outcome for family members. Together, these factors compound the stress and anxiety of family members. This anxiety is natural and it is important for health caregivers to be able to offer the best support possible. A high quality communication provided by structured information given by physicians and nurses as well could improve support to the families and lead to greater satisfaction.
Giving information to families during meetings is crucial at 3 moments: at the first day when the patient is admitted, at day 3, weekly and each time important news is given (surgery, deterioration in condition, end-of-life).
The purpose of this project is to evaluate if the involvement of nurses during those meetings could improve quality in communication which is assessed by mixed methods. Families and healthcare workers satisfaction will be assessed by qualitative methodology. Family peritraumatic stress, symptoms of anxiety and depression and PTSD will be assessed using validated scales.
Training of healthcare workers will be done by role play. Information to the families is delivered using a framework for physicians and nurses. All the meetings of the study will be audited by a psychologist.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
-Randomized trial with two arms: arm 1: information is delivered by a team (physician and nurse) arm 2: information is delivered by the physician alone
-During the different meetings of the study: at day 1, at day 3, weekly and in case of deterioration of the patient condition.
The other days, family information is delivered as usually in both arms.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
-
Paris、フランス、75014
- Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph - Service de Réanimation Polyvalente
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
サンプリング方法
調査対象母集団
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- patient : adult, 1 relative at minimum, mechanically ventilated at least 48 hours; and
- family : french-speaking, adult;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Conflict, organ donor, refusal to participate.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 観測モデル:コホート
- 時間の展望:見込みのある
コホートと介入
グループ/コホート |
|---|
|
Doctor and nurse
|
|
Doctor without nurse
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|
|
Family satisfaction assessed by qualitative approach
時間枠:Patient's ICU discharge day (up to 3 months after Day 1)
|
Patient's ICU discharge day (up to 3 months after Day 1)
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|
|
Healthcaregivers' satifaction assessed by qualitative approach
時間枠:End of the study (up to 2 years)
|
End of the study (up to 2 years)
|
その他の成果指標
結果測定 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|
|
Family PTSD
時間枠:3 months after patient's ICU discharge (up to 6 months after Day 1)
|
3 months after patient's ICU discharge (up to 6 months after Day 1)
|
|
Family HADS
時間枠:3 months after patient's ICU discharge (up to 6 months after Day 1)
|
3 months after patient's ICU discharge (up to 6 months after Day 1)
|
|
Family peri-traumatic dissociation
時間枠:Patient's ICU discharge (up to 3 months after Day 1)
|
Patient's ICU discharge (up to 3 months after Day 1)
|
協力者と研究者
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (見積もり)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。