Functional Impact of a Memory Intervention Program
2016年1月12日 更新者：Susan Vandermorris, Ph.D., C.Psych.、Baycrest
Normal aging is associated with decline in some aspects of memory, and this can be a risk factor for reductions in everyday functioning. The Baycrest Memory and Aging Program teaches positive adaptation to age-related memory changes, including strategies for minimizing the everyday impact of normal memory change and positive lifestyle change to maximize brain health. Prior research has shown that the Memory and Aging program is effective in increasing participants' knowledge about memory, use of memory strategies, and confidence in memory function, as well as adoption of healthier lifestyle practices and reduction in intention to use unneeded health care resources.
Although not one of the stated goals of the program, informal feedback from participants suggests that the educational content and skills training in the Memory and Aging Program has led some participants to change behaviours in ways that lead to significant improvements in their everyday functioning. For example, graduating participants often volunteer examples of how they have applied what they have learned to succeed in everyday memory tasks such as learning a new name or keeping track of future plans. Based on this participant feedback, it is hypothesized that the knowledge, skills, and confidence gained by Memory and Aging Program participants may lead to positive behaviour changes that, in turn, lead to improved everyday functioning. The present study will test this hypothesis using a randomized controlled pretest-posttest design.
調査の概要
研究の種類
介入
入学 (実際)
69
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto、Ontario、カナダ、M6A 2E1
- Baycrest
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
50年～90年 (大人、高齢者)
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
はい
受講資格のある性別
全て
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 50-90
- Available to participate in all testing and intervention sessions (located in Toronto, Canada)
Exclusion Criteria:
- health conditions with major effects on cognition, including a current or previous history of stroke, brain surgery, or diagnosed neurological disorder
- dependence in instrumental activities of daily living
- cognitive impairment, defined as performance below cutoff for cognitive impairment on a standardized cognitive test, the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (Brandt, Spencer, & Folstein, 1988).
- affective impairment, defined as performance below cutoff for depression on standardized depression screen, the Geriatric Depression Scale (Yesavage et al., 1983)
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：処理
- 割り当て：ランダム化
- 介入モデル：並列代入
- マスキング：独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
アクティブコンパレータ：Memory and Aging Program
The Memory and Aging Program intervention consists of five 2-hour sessions conducted over five consecutive weeks.
The content of the program includes: (a) the provision of factual information (i.e., about memory, age-related memory changes, lifestyle factors affecting memory, and memory strategies) in an informal lecture format; and (b) memory intervention (i.e., practice and application of several evidence-based memory strategies) in a hands-on interactive format.
|
|
|
介入なし：Wait-list Control
Participants randomized to the wait-list control group will receive no intervention following randomization.
They will be offered the intervention immediately following completion of the week 14 outcome testing session.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in healthy lifestyle behaviours as measured by Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (Walker, Sechrist, & Pender, 1987)
時間枠：Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
|
Change from baseline in memory strategy use as measured by the Memory Strategy Toolbox (modified from Troyer, 2001)
時間枠：Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
|
Attainment of individualized goals for (a) lifestyle change, (b) memory strategy use, and (c) functional outcomes of memory strategy use as measured by Goal Attainment Scaling (Gordon, Powell, & Rockwood, 2000; Kiresuk, Smith, & Cardillo, 1994)
時間枠：Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|
|
Change in positive and negative affect as measured by Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988)
時間枠：Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
|
Change in general health status as measured by the RAND 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (Ware & Sherbourne, 1992).
時間枠：Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
|
General Self-Efficacy Scale (Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995)
時間枠：Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
|
Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (Smith, Della Sala, Logie, & Maylor, 2000)
時間枠：Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
|
Self-report health status, lifestyle changes, attitudes about aging
時間枠：Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
その他の成果指標
結果測定 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|
|
Change in memory knowledge as measured by Memory knowledge quiz (modified from Troyer, 2001).
時間枠：Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
Baseline, Week 8, week 14
|
|
Change in self-perceived memory as measured by Multifactorial Metamemory Questionnaire (Troyer & Rich, 2002)
時間枠：Baseline, 8 weeks, 14 weeks
|
Baseline, 8 weeks, 14 weeks
|
|
Change in prospective memory function (Prospective telephone-call task, Troyer, 2001; actual week, Rendell & Craik, 2001)
時間枠：Baseline, 8 weeks, 14 weeks
|
Baseline, 8 weeks, 14 weeks
|
|
Change in name learning (Name-learning task, based on Troyer, Häfliger, Cadieux, & Craik, 2006)
時間枠：Baseline, 8 weeks, 14 weeks
|
Baseline, 8 weeks, 14 weeks
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者：Susan Vandermorris, PhD、Baycrest
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
一般刊行物
- Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
- Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
- Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose TL, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, Leirer VO. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res. 1982-1983;17(1):37-49. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4.
- Troyer AK, Rich JB. Psychometric properties of a new metamemory questionnaire for older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002 Jan;57(1):P19-27. doi: 10.1093/geronb/57.1.p19.
- Brandt, J., Spencer, M., & Folstein, M. (1988). The Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, & Behavioral Neurology, 1(2), 111-117.
- Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. The Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile: development and psychometric characteristics. Nurs Res. 1987 Mar-Apr;36(2):76-81.
- Troyer AK, Hafliger A, Cadieux MJ, Craik FI. Name and face learning in older adults: effects of level of processing, self-generation, and intention to learn. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006 Mar;61(2):P67-74. doi: 10.1093/geronb/61.2.p67.
- Gordon J, Rockwood K, Powell C. Assessing patients' views of clinical changes. JAMA. 2000 Apr 12;283(14):1824-5. No abstract available.
- Kiresuk, T. J., Smith, A., & Cardillo, J. E. (1994). Goal attainment scaling: Applications, theory, and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Troyer, A. K. (2001). Improving memory knowledge, satisfaction, and functioning via an education and intervention program for older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 8(4), 256-268.
- Vandermorris S, Au A, Gardner S, Troyer AK. Initiation and maintenance of behaviour change to support memory and brain health in older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2022 May;32(4):611-628. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1841656. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
- Herdman KA, Vandermorris S, Davidson S, Au A, Troyer AK. Comparable achievement of client-identified, self-rated goals in intervention and no-intervention groups: reevaluating the use of Goal Attainment Scaling as an outcome measure. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019 Dec;29(10):1600-1610. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2018.1432490. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
便利なリンク
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始
2014年5月1日
一次修了 (実際)
2015年10月1日
研究の完了 (実際)
2015年10月1日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2014年3月12日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2014年3月12日
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
2014年3月14日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (見積もり)
2016年1月13日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2016年1月12日
最終確認日
2016年1月1日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。