High-density in Spinal Cord Stimulation: Virtual Expert Registry (Discover)
2021年1月28日 更新者：Moens Maarten、Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
This is a prospective, multi-center, observational follow-up study observing the effectiveness of high density spinal cord stimulation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome patients with back and leg pain.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
DISCOVER will measure the effectiveness of high-density spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic back and leg pain.
Identification of clinical effective parameters concerning location of active electrodes, frequency, pulse duration, amplitude and battery consumption are, besides safety, the major outcome parameters of this study.
研究の種類
観察的
入学 (実際)
272
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
-
Brussel、ベルギー
- UZ Brussel
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
18年～65年 (大人、高齢者)
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
いいえ
受講資格のある性別
全て
サンプリング方法
非確率サンプル
調査対象母集団
Patients with chronic back and leg pain (due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome) who either received SCS or have not sufficient pain reduction with traditional parameters or patients with chronic back and leg pain who are candidate for SCS will receive HD SCS.
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Failed Back Surgery Syndrome patients (FBSS) with insufficient pain reduction with conventional SCS or FBSS patients suitable for SCS
- Age > 18 years
- Chronic pain as a result of FBSS that exists for at least 6 months with a pain intensity 5 or higher measured on numeric rating scale (NRS)
- Patient has been informed of the study procedures and has given written informed consent
- Patient willing to comply with study protocol including attending the study visits
Exclusion Criteria:
- Expected inability of patients to receive or properly operate the spinal cord stimulation system
- History of coagulation disorders, lupus erythematosus, diabetic neuropathy, rheumatoid arthritis or morbus Bechterew
- Active malignancy
- Addiction to any of the following drugs, alcohol (5E/day) and/or medication
- Evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance to intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by investigator
- Immune deficiency (HIV positive, immunosuppressiva, etc.)
- Life expectancy < 1 year
- Local infection or other skin disorder at site of incision
- Pregnancy
- Other implanted active medical device
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
コホートと介入
グループ/コホート |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
spinal cord stimulation
Failed back surgery syndrome patients will receive high density spinal cord stimulation
|
他の名前：
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain intensity with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
時間枠：The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
|
|
Pain relief by pain medication
時間枠：The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
Questionnaire regarding the amount of pain relief by pain medication
|
The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
|
The abilities in daily living
時間枠：The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
The functional abilities will be assessed with the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire.
|
The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
|
The current health status
時間枠：The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
The health status will be observed with the Euroqol (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire.
|
The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
|
Subjective sleep quality
時間枠：The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
Subjective sleep quality will be assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
|
The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
|
Patient's satisfaction
時間枠：The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
Patient's satisfaction with the stimulation will be assessed with a 5 item Likert scale
|
The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain area coverage
時間枠：The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
The patient has to draw the areas of pain coverage on a body shape figure
|
The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
|
Paresthesia threshold
時間枠：The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
Patient indicates the threshold at which he experiences paresthesia
|
The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
|
HD stim parameters
時間枠：The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
Questionnaire towards the clinician regarding the ideal high density parameters for this patient
|
The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
|
Battery efficiency of the neurostimulator
時間枠：The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
The battery usage will be measured by frequencies to recharge the battery.
|
The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
|
AdaptiveStim use (in case of Restore Sensor)
時間枠：The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
Acquire information on activity from the internal diary; amount of times that patients need to fit the ideal parameters themselves
|
The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
|
MRI need
時間枠：The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
Questionnaire regarding the need for MR scans for other medical conditions
|
The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
協力者
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
一般刊行物
- Song Z, Meyerson BA, Linderoth B. High-Frequency (1 kHz) Spinal Cord Stimulation-Is Pulse Shape Crucial for the Efficacy? A Pilot Study. Neuromodulation. 2015 Dec;18(8):714-20. doi: 10.1111/ner.12344. Epub 2015 Sep 6.
- Sweet J, Badjatiya A, Tan D, Miller J. Paresthesia-Free High-Density Spinal Cord Stimulation for Postlaminectomy Syndrome in a Prescreened Population: A Prospective Case Series. Neuromodulation. 2016 Apr;19(3):260-7. doi: 10.1111/ner.12357. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
- Goudman L, Rigoard P, Billot M, De Smedt A, Roulaud M, Consortium D, Moens M; Discover Consortium. Spinal Cord Stimulation-Naive Patients vs Patients With Failed Previous Experiences With Standard Spinal Cord Stimulation: Two Distinct Entities or One Population? Neuromodulation. 2023 Jan;26(1):157-163. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.04.037. Epub 2022 May 10.
- Goudman L, De Smedt A, Eldabe S, Rigoard P, Linderoth B, De Jaeger M, Moens M; Discover Consortium. High-dose spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome: a multicenter effectiveness and prediction study. Pain. 2021 Feb 1;162(2):582-590. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002035.
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始
2016年6月1日
一次修了 (実際)
2020年12月8日
研究の完了 (実際)
2020年12月8日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2016年5月26日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2016年5月26日
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
2016年6月1日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2021年2月1日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2021年1月28日
最終確認日
2021年1月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- Discover1
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。