Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

High-density in Spinal Cord Stimulation: Virtual Expert Registry (Discover)

28. januar 2021 opdateret af: Moens Maarten, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
This is a prospective, multi-center, observational follow-up study observing the effectiveness of high density spinal cord stimulation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome patients with back and leg pain.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljeret beskrivelse

DISCOVER will measure the effectiveness of high-density spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic back and leg pain. Identification of clinical effective parameters concerning location of active electrodes, frequency, pulse duration, amplitude and battery consumption are, besides safety, the major outcome parameters of this study.

Undersøgelsestype

Observationel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

272

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

      • Brussel, Belgien
        • UZ Brussel

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år til 65 år (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Prøveudtagningsmetode

Ikke-sandsynlighedsprøve

Studiebefolkning

Patients with chronic back and leg pain (due to Failed Back Surgery Syndrome) who either received SCS or have not sufficient pain reduction with traditional parameters or patients with chronic back and leg pain who are candidate for SCS will receive HD SCS.

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Failed Back Surgery Syndrome patients (FBSS) with insufficient pain reduction with conventional SCS or FBSS patients suitable for SCS
  • Age > 18 years
  • Chronic pain as a result of FBSS that exists for at least 6 months with a pain intensity 5 or higher measured on numeric rating scale (NRS)
  • Patient has been informed of the study procedures and has given written informed consent
  • Patient willing to comply with study protocol including attending the study visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Expected inability of patients to receive or properly operate the spinal cord stimulation system
  • History of coagulation disorders, lupus erythematosus, diabetic neuropathy, rheumatoid arthritis or morbus Bechterew
  • Active malignancy
  • Addiction to any of the following drugs, alcohol (5E/day) and/or medication
  • Evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance to intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by investigator
  • Immune deficiency (HIV positive, immunosuppressiva, etc.)
  • Life expectancy < 1 year
  • Local infection or other skin disorder at site of incision
  • Pregnancy
  • Other implanted active medical device

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

Kohorter og interventioner

Gruppe / kohorte
Intervention / Behandling
spinal cord stimulation
Failed back surgery syndrome patients will receive high density spinal cord stimulation
Andre navne:
  • high density spinal cord stimulation

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Pain intensity with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Tidsramme: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Pain relief by pain medication
Tidsramme: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Questionnaire regarding the amount of pain relief by pain medication
The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
The abilities in daily living
Tidsramme: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
The functional abilities will be assessed with the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire.
The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
The current health status
Tidsramme: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
The health status will be observed with the Euroqol (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire.
The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Subjective sleep quality
Tidsramme: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Subjective sleep quality will be assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Patient's satisfaction
Tidsramme: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Patient's satisfaction with the stimulation will be assessed with a 5 item Likert scale
The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Pain area coverage
Tidsramme: The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
The patient has to draw the areas of pain coverage on a body shape figure
The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Paresthesia threshold
Tidsramme: The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Patient indicates the threshold at which he experiences paresthesia
The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
HD stim parameters
Tidsramme: The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Questionnaire towards the clinician regarding the ideal high density parameters for this patient
The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Battery efficiency of the neurostimulator
Tidsramme: The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
The battery usage will be measured by frequencies to recharge the battery.
The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
AdaptiveStim use (in case of Restore Sensor)
Tidsramme: The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Acquire information on activity from the internal diary; amount of times that patients need to fit the ideal parameters themselves
The difference between the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
MRI need
Tidsramme: The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.
Questionnaire regarding the need for MR scans for other medical conditions
The difference between the baseline screening and the evaluation 1 month after high density stimulation, 3 months and 12 months.

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Samarbejdspartnere

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. juni 2016

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

8. december 2020

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

8. december 2020

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

26. maj 2016

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

26. maj 2016

Først opslået (Skøn)

1. juni 2016

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

1. februar 2021

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

28. januar 2021

Sidst verificeret

1. januar 2021

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Mislykket rygkirurgi syndrom

Kliniske forsøg med spinal cord stimulation

Abonner