The Effects of Using the Empowerment Model Intervention in Primary Total Hip Replacement Surgery Elders
The Effects of Using the Empowerment Model Intervention in Primary Total Hip
調査の概要
詳細な説明
Aims. To exam the effectiveness of the empowerment education program on primary (self-care self-efficacy and competence) and secondary outcomes (Activities of Daily Life, mobility, depressive mood, and quality of life) for older adults with total hip replacement surgery.
Background. Degenerative arthritis is a common and serious chronic illness that impacts the quality of life of older adults. As joints degenerate continuously and the hip has been damaged by arthritis, Activities of Daily Life will be difficult to perform due to severe hip pain and joint stiffness. Therefore, hip replacement surgery should be considered, and effective nursing care should be provided to improve the recovery of older adults.
Design. A prospective randomized control trial. Methods. A trial was conducted from September of 2013 to May of 2014 in two hospitals in northern Taiwan. 108 participants were randomly assigned to either the empowerment education group or the comparison group. The outcomes were collected at the day of discharge (T2), one month after (T3), and 3 months (T4) after the discharge.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- had 1st THRS
- ability to speak and read Chinese
- willingness to participate in this study
Exclusion Criteria:
- cognitive impairment or been diagnosed with a psychiatric illness
- participation in another study
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:支持療法
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
介入なし:comparison group
The CG received no extra care; they could receive the usual routine care for THR in the unit as they had before participation in the study.
The routine care included oral instruction by nurses follow by the handout.
Also, a brochure was provided of the structure of hip, the risk factors of THR, care before and after THR, complications, care of discharge, and demonstration of rehabilitation with pictures) of THR designed by researchers in this study.
Five orthopedics health care experts independently reviewed and rated each item in the brochure on a five-point Likert-type scale in terms of relevance, representativeness, specificity, and clarity.
|
|
|
実験的:Empowerment education group
The 5 times total, 12-week EE intervention was aimed to empower older patients with THR to develop their own self-management program to meet their needs.
This empowerment education intervention based on 6 empowerment components: "Partnership, listening, dialogue, reflection, action, feedback" and 5-step empowerment strategies: motivating patients self-awareness, assessing the causes of the problem, goal setting, individual self-care plan development, and checking whether goals or plans have been achieved who modified from Freire's 3-stage methodology.
The difference between this program and the other health educations for patients with THR are that this program encourages them to explore their needs and worries, their own ability and power to meet their needs, and their capacity to seek and use their social support and resources etc.
|
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Total Hip Replacement Self-efficacy Scale
時間枠:5min
|
A five-item evaluation list measured self-efficacy (environment, self-monitoring, regular check-up, medicine, exercise), all components were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (4= fully confident to 0= no confidence at all) with higher scores signifying greater self-efficacy.
|
5min
|
|
Self-care competence Scale
時間枠:5min
|
The knowledge and behaviors subscales measured this variable, which includes knowledge and behavior related to THR self-care.
The knowledge subscale contains 15 yes/no questions (6 for posture/ environment, 6 for wound/pain, and 3 for exercise), each with only one correct response.
In order to prevent participants that guessed answers from confounding the data, the choice 'I do not know' was also provided.
The scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge.
|
5min
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
ADL
時間枠:3min
|
ADL was assessed using the Barthel scale, which was introduced in 1965 and yielded a score of 0-100, the measure 10 variables.
These variables included fecal incontinence, urinary incontinence, and assistance with grooming, feeding, transfers, walking, dressing, climbing stairs, and bathing.
|
3min
|
|
Tinetti mobility
時間枠:3min
|
The Tinetti Mobility Scale (Tinetti et al. 1986) assessed mobility (gait and balance).
This scale is simple: no required equipment attached and is quick and convenient to use.
Each participant took around 5 minutes to perform the series of activities to assess mobility.
The better a participant's performance, the higher the score.
|
3min
|
|
GDS-15
時間枠:3min
|
consisting of 15 questions, was the primary outcome evaluator (Sheikh and Yesavage, 1986).
Scores of 0-4 are considered to be normal; 5-8 indicates mild depression; 9-11 indicates moderate depression; and 12-15 indicates severe depression.
|
3min
|
|
SF-36
時間枠:3min
|
The SF-36 questionnaire assesses health-related functions for eight distinct domains, which can be divided into physical component and mental component scales.
This 36-item questionnaire was used to measure quality of life.
|
3min
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 97-2081B
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。