Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

The Effects of Using the Empowerment Model Intervention in Primary Total Hip Replacement Surgery Elders

22. mai 2018 oppdatert av: Tzu-Ting Huang

The Effects of Using the Empowerment Model Intervention in Primary Total Hip

Degenerative arthritis is a common and serious chronic illness that impacts the quality of life of older adults. Knowledge about the effects of empowerment education program in older adults with total hip replacement surgery are limited. As far as the investigators know, this is the first study done using empowerment education intervention to promote total hip replacement patients' self-care. This partnership is achieved through active participation to learn as well as sharing their knowledge and experiences with clinicians and patients. Furthermore, patients had developed some degree of self-efficacy and improve their depressive mood from the disease related knowledge acquired.

Studieoversikt

Status

Fullført

Forhold

Intervensjon / Behandling

Detaljert beskrivelse

Aims. To exam the effectiveness of the empowerment education program on primary (self-care self-efficacy and competence) and secondary outcomes (Activities of Daily Life, mobility, depressive mood, and quality of life) for older adults with total hip replacement surgery.

Background. Degenerative arthritis is a common and serious chronic illness that impacts the quality of life of older adults. As joints degenerate continuously and the hip has been damaged by arthritis, Activities of Daily Life will be difficult to perform due to severe hip pain and joint stiffness. Therefore, hip replacement surgery should be considered, and effective nursing care should be provided to improve the recovery of older adults.

Design. A prospective randomized control trial. Methods. A trial was conducted from September of 2013 to May of 2014 in two hospitals in northern Taiwan. 108 participants were randomly assigned to either the empowerment education group or the comparison group. The outcomes were collected at the day of discharge (T2), one month after (T3), and 3 months (T4) after the discharge.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

108

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

50 år og eldre (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • had 1st THRS
  • ability to speak and read Chinese
  • willingness to participate in this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cognitive impairment or been diagnosed with a psychiatric illness
  • participation in another study

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Støttende omsorg
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Enkelt

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Ingen inngripen: comparison group
The CG received no extra care; they could receive the usual routine care for THR in the unit as they had before participation in the study. The routine care included oral instruction by nurses follow by the handout. Also, a brochure was provided of the structure of hip, the risk factors of THR, care before and after THR, complications, care of discharge, and demonstration of rehabilitation with pictures) of THR designed by researchers in this study. Five orthopedics health care experts independently reviewed and rated each item in the brochure on a five-point Likert-type scale in terms of relevance, representativeness, specificity, and clarity.
Eksperimentell: Empowerment education group
The 5 times total, 12-week EE intervention was aimed to empower older patients with THR to develop their own self-management program to meet their needs. This empowerment education intervention based on 6 empowerment components: "Partnership, listening, dialogue, reflection, action, feedback" and 5-step empowerment strategies: motivating patients self-awareness, assessing the causes of the problem, goal setting, individual self-care plan development, and checking whether goals or plans have been achieved who modified from Freire's 3-stage methodology. The difference between this program and the other health educations for patients with THR are that this program encourages them to explore their needs and worries, their own ability and power to meet their needs, and their capacity to seek and use their social support and resources etc.
Annen: Empowerment education

  1. admission (1 hour)

    ▪partnership

  2. 2 ds after THR (30-45min)

    • listening
    • dialogue
    • reflection
    • action
    • feedback

  3. 2 WKs after THR (30 min)

    • listening
    • dialogue
    • reflection
    • action
    • feedback

  4. 6 WKs after THR (30 min)

    • listening
    • dialogue
    • reflection
    • action
    • feedback

  5. 10 WKs after THR (30 min)

    • listening
    • dialogue
    • reflection
    • action
    • feedback

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Total Hip Replacement Self-efficacy Scale
Tidsramme: 5min
A five-item evaluation list measured self-efficacy (environment, self-monitoring, regular check-up, medicine, exercise), all components were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (4= fully confident to 0= no confidence at all) with higher scores signifying greater self-efficacy.
5min
Self-care competence Scale
Tidsramme: 5min
The knowledge and behaviors subscales measured this variable, which includes knowledge and behavior related to THR self-care. The knowledge subscale contains 15 yes/no questions (6 for posture/ environment, 6 for wound/pain, and 3 for exercise), each with only one correct response. In order to prevent participants that guessed answers from confounding the data, the choice 'I do not know' was also provided. The scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge.
5min

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
ADL
Tidsramme: 3min
ADL was assessed using the Barthel scale, which was introduced in 1965 and yielded a score of 0-100, the measure 10 variables. These variables included fecal incontinence, urinary incontinence, and assistance with grooming, feeding, transfers, walking, dressing, climbing stairs, and bathing.
3min
Tinetti mobility
Tidsramme: 3min
The Tinetti Mobility Scale (Tinetti et al. 1986) assessed mobility (gait and balance). This scale is simple: no required equipment attached and is quick and convenient to use. Each participant took around 5 minutes to perform the series of activities to assess mobility. The better a participant's performance, the higher the score.
3min
GDS-15
Tidsramme: 3min
consisting of 15 questions, was the primary outcome evaluator (Sheikh and Yesavage, 1986). Scores of 0-4 are considered to be normal; 5-8 indicates mild depression; 9-11 indicates moderate depression; and 12-15 indicates severe depression.
3min
SF-36
Tidsramme: 3min
The SF-36 questionnaire assesses health-related functions for eight distinct domains, which can be divided into physical component and mental component scales. This 36-item questionnaire was used to measure quality of life.
3min

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Sponsor

Tzu-Ting Huang

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart

1. september 2013

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

1. mai 2014

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

1. mai 2014

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

21. juni 2016

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

23. juni 2016

Først lagt ut (Anslag)

28. juni 2016

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

23. mai 2018

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

22. mai 2018

Sist bekreftet

1. mai 2018

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • 97-2081B

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Kliniske studier på Myndiggjøring

Kliniske studier på Empowerment education

Søk i lignende forsøk

Sponsorer og samarbeidspartnere

Medisinsk tilstand

Legemiddelintervensjoner

CROs by country

CROs in Algeria

Forhold

Sjeldne sykdommer

Legemiddelintervensjoner

Kosttilskudd

Sponsor / samarbeidspartnere

Steder

3
Abonnere