Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

The Effects of Using the Empowerment Model Intervention in Primary Total Hip Replacement Surgery Elders

22 maggio 2018 aggiornato da: Tzu-Ting Huang

The Effects of Using the Empowerment Model Intervention in Primary Total Hip

Degenerative arthritis is a common and serious chronic illness that impacts the quality of life of older adults. Knowledge about the effects of empowerment education program in older adults with total hip replacement surgery are limited. As far as the investigators know, this is the first study done using empowerment education intervention to promote total hip replacement patients' self-care. This partnership is achieved through active participation to learn as well as sharing their knowledge and experiences with clinicians and patients. Furthermore, patients had developed some degree of self-efficacy and improve their depressive mood from the disease related knowledge acquired.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Completato

Condizioni

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Aims. To exam the effectiveness of the empowerment education program on primary (self-care self-efficacy and competence) and secondary outcomes (Activities of Daily Life, mobility, depressive mood, and quality of life) for older adults with total hip replacement surgery.

Background. Degenerative arthritis is a common and serious chronic illness that impacts the quality of life of older adults. As joints degenerate continuously and the hip has been damaged by arthritis, Activities of Daily Life will be difficult to perform due to severe hip pain and joint stiffness. Therefore, hip replacement surgery should be considered, and effective nursing care should be provided to improve the recovery of older adults.

Design. A prospective randomized control trial. Methods. A trial was conducted from September of 2013 to May of 2014 in two hospitals in northern Taiwan. 108 participants were randomly assigned to either the empowerment education group or the comparison group. The outcomes were collected at the day of discharge (T2), one month after (T3), and 3 months (T4) after the discharge.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

108

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

50 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • had 1st THRS
  • ability to speak and read Chinese
  • willingness to participate in this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cognitive impairment or been diagnosed with a psychiatric illness
  • participation in another study

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Terapia di supporto
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Nessun intervento: comparison group
The CG received no extra care; they could receive the usual routine care for THR in the unit as they had before participation in the study. The routine care included oral instruction by nurses follow by the handout. Also, a brochure was provided of the structure of hip, the risk factors of THR, care before and after THR, complications, care of discharge, and demonstration of rehabilitation with pictures) of THR designed by researchers in this study. Five orthopedics health care experts independently reviewed and rated each item in the brochure on a five-point Likert-type scale in terms of relevance, representativeness, specificity, and clarity.
Sperimentale: Empowerment education group
The 5 times total, 12-week EE intervention was aimed to empower older patients with THR to develop their own self-management program to meet their needs. This empowerment education intervention based on 6 empowerment components: "Partnership, listening, dialogue, reflection, action, feedback" and 5-step empowerment strategies: motivating patients self-awareness, assessing the causes of the problem, goal setting, individual self-care plan development, and checking whether goals or plans have been achieved who modified from Freire's 3-stage methodology. The difference between this program and the other health educations for patients with THR are that this program encourages them to explore their needs and worries, their own ability and power to meet their needs, and their capacity to seek and use their social support and resources etc.
  1. admission (1 hour)

    ▪partnership

  2. 2 ds after THR (30-45min)

    • listening
    • dialogue
    • reflection
    • action
    • feedback
  3. 2 WKs after THR (30 min)

    • listening
    • dialogue
    • reflection
    • action
    • feedback
  4. 6 WKs after THR (30 min)

    • listening
    • dialogue
    • reflection
    • action
    • feedback
  5. 10 WKs after THR (30 min)

    • listening
    • dialogue
    • reflection
    • action
    • feedback

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Total Hip Replacement Self-efficacy Scale
Lasso di tempo: 5min
A five-item evaluation list measured self-efficacy (environment, self-monitoring, regular check-up, medicine, exercise), all components were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (4= fully confident to 0= no confidence at all) with higher scores signifying greater self-efficacy.
5min
Self-care competence Scale
Lasso di tempo: 5min
The knowledge and behaviors subscales measured this variable, which includes knowledge and behavior related to THR self-care. The knowledge subscale contains 15 yes/no questions (6 for posture/ environment, 6 for wound/pain, and 3 for exercise), each with only one correct response. In order to prevent participants that guessed answers from confounding the data, the choice 'I do not know' was also provided. The scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge.
5min

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
ADL
Lasso di tempo: 3min
ADL was assessed using the Barthel scale, which was introduced in 1965 and yielded a score of 0-100, the measure 10 variables. These variables included fecal incontinence, urinary incontinence, and assistance with grooming, feeding, transfers, walking, dressing, climbing stairs, and bathing.
3min
Tinetti mobility
Lasso di tempo: 3min
The Tinetti Mobility Scale (Tinetti et al. 1986) assessed mobility (gait and balance). This scale is simple: no required equipment attached and is quick and convenient to use. Each participant took around 5 minutes to perform the series of activities to assess mobility. The better a participant's performance, the higher the score.
3min
GDS-15
Lasso di tempo: 3min
consisting of 15 questions, was the primary outcome evaluator (Sheikh and Yesavage, 1986). Scores of 0-4 are considered to be normal; 5-8 indicates mild depression; 9-11 indicates moderate depression; and 12-15 indicates severe depression.
3min
SF-36
Lasso di tempo: 3min
The SF-36 questionnaire assesses health-related functions for eight distinct domains, which can be divided into physical component and mental component scales. This 36-item questionnaire was used to measure quality of life.
3min

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio

1 settembre 2013

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

1 maggio 2014

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

1 maggio 2014

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

21 giugno 2016

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

23 giugno 2016

Primo Inserito (Stima)

28 giugno 2016

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

23 maggio 2018

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

22 maggio 2018

Ultimo verificato

1 maggio 2018

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • 97-2081B

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi