Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

The Effects of Using the Empowerment Model Intervention in Primary Total Hip Replacement Surgery Elders

22 maj 2018 uppdaterad av: Tzu-Ting Huang

The Effects of Using the Empowerment Model Intervention in Primary Total Hip

Degenerative arthritis is a common and serious chronic illness that impacts the quality of life of older adults. Knowledge about the effects of empowerment education program in older adults with total hip replacement surgery are limited. As far as the investigators know, this is the first study done using empowerment education intervention to promote total hip replacement patients' self-care. This partnership is achieved through active participation to learn as well as sharing their knowledge and experiences with clinicians and patients. Furthermore, patients had developed some degree of self-efficacy and improve their depressive mood from the disease related knowledge acquired.

Studieöversikt

Status

Avslutad

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Detaljerad beskrivning

Aims. To exam the effectiveness of the empowerment education program on primary (self-care self-efficacy and competence) and secondary outcomes (Activities of Daily Life, mobility, depressive mood, and quality of life) for older adults with total hip replacement surgery.

Background. Degenerative arthritis is a common and serious chronic illness that impacts the quality of life of older adults. As joints degenerate continuously and the hip has been damaged by arthritis, Activities of Daily Life will be difficult to perform due to severe hip pain and joint stiffness. Therefore, hip replacement surgery should be considered, and effective nursing care should be provided to improve the recovery of older adults.

Design. A prospective randomized control trial. Methods. A trial was conducted from September of 2013 to May of 2014 in two hospitals in northern Taiwan. 108 participants were randomly assigned to either the empowerment education group or the comparison group. The outcomes were collected at the day of discharge (T2), one month after (T3), and 3 months (T4) after the discharge.

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

108

Fas

  • Inte tillämpbar

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

50 år och äldre (Vuxen, Äldre vuxen)

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Allt

Beskrivning

Inclusion Criteria:

  • had 1st THRS
  • ability to speak and read Chinese
  • willingness to participate in this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cognitive impairment or been diagnosed with a psychiatric illness
  • participation in another study

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Stödjande vård
  • Tilldelning: Randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Enda

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Inget ingripande: comparison group
The CG received no extra care; they could receive the usual routine care for THR in the unit as they had before participation in the study. The routine care included oral instruction by nurses follow by the handout. Also, a brochure was provided of the structure of hip, the risk factors of THR, care before and after THR, complications, care of discharge, and demonstration of rehabilitation with pictures) of THR designed by researchers in this study. Five orthopedics health care experts independently reviewed and rated each item in the brochure on a five-point Likert-type scale in terms of relevance, representativeness, specificity, and clarity.
Experimentell: Empowerment education group
The 5 times total, 12-week EE intervention was aimed to empower older patients with THR to develop their own self-management program to meet their needs. This empowerment education intervention based on 6 empowerment components: "Partnership, listening, dialogue, reflection, action, feedback" and 5-step empowerment strategies: motivating patients self-awareness, assessing the causes of the problem, goal setting, individual self-care plan development, and checking whether goals or plans have been achieved who modified from Freire's 3-stage methodology. The difference between this program and the other health educations for patients with THR are that this program encourages them to explore their needs and worries, their own ability and power to meet their needs, and their capacity to seek and use their social support and resources etc.
Övrig: Empowerment education

  1. admission (1 hour)

    ▪partnership

  2. 2 ds after THR (30-45min)

    • listening
    • dialogue
    • reflection
    • action
    • feedback

  3. 2 WKs after THR (30 min)

    • listening
    • dialogue
    • reflection
    • action
    • feedback

  4. 6 WKs after THR (30 min)

    • listening
    • dialogue
    • reflection
    • action
    • feedback

  5. 10 WKs after THR (30 min)

    • listening
    • dialogue
    • reflection
    • action
    • feedback

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Total Hip Replacement Self-efficacy Scale
Tidsram: 5min
A five-item evaluation list measured self-efficacy (environment, self-monitoring, regular check-up, medicine, exercise), all components were rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (4= fully confident to 0= no confidence at all) with higher scores signifying greater self-efficacy.
5min
Self-care competence Scale
Tidsram: 5min
The knowledge and behaviors subscales measured this variable, which includes knowledge and behavior related to THR self-care. The knowledge subscale contains 15 yes/no questions (6 for posture/ environment, 6 for wound/pain, and 3 for exercise), each with only one correct response. In order to prevent participants that guessed answers from confounding the data, the choice 'I do not know' was also provided. The scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge.
5min

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
ADL
Tidsram: 3min
ADL was assessed using the Barthel scale, which was introduced in 1965 and yielded a score of 0-100, the measure 10 variables. These variables included fecal incontinence, urinary incontinence, and assistance with grooming, feeding, transfers, walking, dressing, climbing stairs, and bathing.
3min
Tinetti mobility
Tidsram: 3min
The Tinetti Mobility Scale (Tinetti et al. 1986) assessed mobility (gait and balance). This scale is simple: no required equipment attached and is quick and convenient to use. Each participant took around 5 minutes to perform the series of activities to assess mobility. The better a participant's performance, the higher the score.
3min
GDS-15
Tidsram: 3min
consisting of 15 questions, was the primary outcome evaluator (Sheikh and Yesavage, 1986). Scores of 0-4 are considered to be normal; 5-8 indicates mild depression; 9-11 indicates moderate depression; and 12-15 indicates severe depression.
3min
SF-36
Tidsram: 3min
The SF-36 questionnaire assesses health-related functions for eight distinct domains, which can be divided into physical component and mental component scales. This 36-item questionnaire was used to measure quality of life.
3min

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Sponsor

Tzu-Ting Huang

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart

1 september 2013

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

1 maj 2014

Avslutad studie (Faktisk)

1 maj 2014

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

21 juni 2016

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

23 juni 2016

Första postat (Uppskatta)

28 juni 2016

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)

23 maj 2018

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

22 maj 2018

Senast verifierad

1 maj 2018

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • 97-2081B

Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)

Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?

Nej

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Kliniska prövningar på Bemyndigande

Kliniska prövningar på Empowerment education

Sök liknande försök

Sponsorer och medarbetare

Medicinska tillstånd

Läkemedelsinterventioner

CROs by country

CROs in Belgium

Betingelser

Sällsynta sjukdomar

Läkemedelsinterventioner

Kosttillskott

Sponsor / medarbetare

Platser

3
Prenumerera