Intra-operative Feed Back on Traction Force During Vacuum Extraction: Safe Vacuum Extraction Alliance (SVEA)
Intra-operative Feed Back on Traction Force During Vacuum Extraction: a Randomized Control Study of Mid and Low Metal Cup Deliveries.
The objective of the clinical investigation is to test whether intra-operative traction force feed back during vacuum extraction leads to a significant decrease in incidence of brain damage in neonates.
By randomization, half of the vacuum extraction patients will be assigned to delivery using a new intelligent handle for vacuum extractions, and half will be assigned to conventional method without traction force measurement.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
The most common indications for vacuum extraction are dystocia and/or fetal asphyxia. The safety of assisted vaginal delivery with vacuum extraction has been discussed since its introduction almost fifty years ago. Serious complications such as asphyxia, intracranial hemorrhage and seizures are overrepresented at vacuum extraction compared to spontaneous vaginal delivery.
Little has been done to improve the procedure since the introduction. Safety measures recommended include restricting total time and number of pulls, a full 34 week gestation, and station of the head at the spines or below. A general advice is also to avoid excessive traction force. There is no general agreement to what a safe traction force might be. With exceeding force there seems to be an increased risk for rupture of the sagittal sinus and tearing of the falx at its attachment to the tentorium. Furthermore, when the fetal head is becoming exceedingly elongated and flattened, and as the cup pops off it might cause damage to the brain and blood vessels.
During the procedure the obstetrician is under significant stress and the subjective element of the evaluation of traction force is a concern. The difficult decision of whether to continue a heavy extraction or abort the operation is made under stressful conditions and based mostly on subjective impressions.
To provide the obstetrician with more objective information, the investigators developed a new device consisting of an intelligent handle hooked to the chain of a regular metal cup.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
-
Stockholm、スウェーデン、14186
- Karolinska University Hospital
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 子
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Medical or social reasons for vacuum extraction with a metal cup, gestational age ≥37+0 weeks, singleton, cephalic
Exclusion Criteria:
- Multiple pregnancy, breech presentation, gestational age <37+0
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:防止
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:Vacuum extraction intelligent system
Measurement and intra-operative feed back of vacuum extraction data: notification signal based an algorithm calculation using traction force (peak and time force integral) and time.
|
Vacuum extraction intelligent system - this is the intervention
|
|
介入なし:conventional
conventional handle
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Composite neonatal brain damage
時間枠:From start of extraction through 28 days after delivery (or until discharge from the hospital)
|
Composite consists of: Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), seizures, perinatal mortality and subgaleal hematoma as routinely diagnosed in patient chart
|
From start of extraction through 28 days after delivery (or until discharge from the hospital)
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Magnus Westgren, Professor、Karolinska Institutet
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- MALMSTROM T. The vacuum extractor, an obstetrical instrument. I. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1957;36(suppl 3):5-50. No abstract available.
- Moolgaoker AS, Ahamed SO, Payne PR. A comparison of different methods of instrumental delivery based on electronic measurements of compression and traction. Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Sep;54(3):299-309.
- Towner DR, Ciotti MC. Operative vaginal delivery: a cause of birth injury or is it? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;50(3):563-81. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31811eaa39.
- Whitby EH, Griffiths PD, Rutter S, Smith MF, Sprigg A, Ohadike P, Davies NP, Rigby AS, Paley MN. Frequency and natural history of subdural haemorrhages in babies and relation to obstetric factors. Lancet. 2004 Mar 13;363(9412):846-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15730-9.
- Pettersson K, Ajne J, Yousaf K, Sturm D, Westgren M, Ajne G. Traction force during vacuum extraction: a prospective observational study. BJOG. 2015 Dec;122(13):1809-16. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13222. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
- Romero S, Pettersson K, Yousaf K, Westgren M, Ajne G. Perinatal outcome after vacuum assisted delivery with digital feedback on traction force; a randomised controlled study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Feb 26;21(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03604-z.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。