Microsurgical vs Macro Surgical Approach for Grade II Gingival Recessions Employing Laterally Repositioned Flap (CCMMRCLDF)
Comparison of Conventional vs Microsurgical Method for Root Coverage by Lateral Displacement Flap
調査の概要
詳細な説明
In this study total, 30 patients were selected The patients initially received a comprehensive periodontal examination and complete plaque control program including oral hygiene to eliminate habits related to the aetiology of recession. Scaling, root planning and occlusal adjustments were done The patients were randomly assigned and divided into two groups. Group A and Group B. Patients with miller class II were treated with a laterally repositioned flap to obtain root coverage using conventional macrosurgical approach (15patients) and microsurgical approach(15patients)
The clinical parameters evaluated were height of gingival recession relative clinical attachment level which was measured as the distance from a fixed point in a stent to the bottom of the pocket and gingival biotype at baseline, 3 months and 6 months period
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Telangana
-
Hyderabad、Telangana、インド、500060
- Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 20-50 yrs
- ClassII gingival recession
- Vital teeth that were free from caries or inadequate restorations
- Sufficient width of attached gingiva
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any systemic diseases and smokers
- ClassI,III&IV gingival recession
- Abnormal frenal attachments
- Interdental bone loss with tooth mobility
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：処理
- 割り当て：なし
- 介入モデル：単一グループの割り当て
- マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：experimental group
Group A-15 patients were allocated to the microsurgical group for root coverage. following scaling and root planning, the laterally repositioned flap was done using the microsurgical approach Group B-15 Patients were allocated to the conventional group for root coverage following scaling and root planning, the laterally repositioned flap was done using the macrosurgical approach |
Group A: After administration of local anaesthesia using ophthalmic microsurgical knives a V-shaped incision was made in the gingival recession area. the gingiva was removed .the adjacent partial thickness pedicle flap was reflected from the donor area .the pedicle flap was then covered over the recipient site. then secured with 6-0 absorbable sling suture without tension. the surgical procedure was done with seilar microscope 40X magnification. Group B: After administration of local anaesthesia using 15 no blade a V-shaped incision was made in the gingival recession area . gingiva was removed .the adjacent partial thickness pedicle flap was reflected from the donor area .the pedicle flap was then covered over the recipient site. then carefully secured with 4-0 absorbable sling suture |
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
vertical depth of recession
時間枠：Change in level of gingival margin from baseline to 6 months.
|
The height of gingival recession: From cementoenamel junction to the free gingival margin.
|
Change in level of gingival margin from baseline to 6 months.
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
horizontal width of recession
時間枠：Change in horizontal dimension of gingival margin from baseline to 6 months.
|
The width of gingival recession: Horizontal dimension of gingival defect at the level of Cementoenamel junction..
|
Change in horizontal dimension of gingival margin from baseline to 6 months.
|
協力者と研究者
捜査官
- スタディディレクター：veerendranath reddy, MDS、Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences
出版物と役立つリンク
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。