Microsurgical vs Macro Surgical Approach for Grade II Gingival Recessions Employing Laterally Repositioned Flap (CCMMRCLDF)
Comparison of Conventional vs Microsurgical Method for Root Coverage by Lateral Displacement Flap
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
In this study total, 30 patients were selected The patients initially received a comprehensive periodontal examination and complete plaque control program including oral hygiene to eliminate habits related to the aetiology of recession. Scaling, root planning and occlusal adjustments were done The patients were randomly assigned and divided into two groups. Group A and Group B. Patients with miller class II were treated with a laterally repositioned flap to obtain root coverage using conventional macrosurgical approach (15patients) and microsurgical approach(15patients)
The clinical parameters evaluated were height of gingival recession relative clinical attachment level which was measured as the distance from a fixed point in a stent to the bottom of the pocket and gingival biotype at baseline, 3 months and 6 months period
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Telangana
-
Hyderabad, Telangana, India, 500060
- Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 20-50 yrs
- ClassII gingival recession
- Vital teeth that were free from caries or inadequate restorations
- Sufficient width of attached gingiva
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any systemic diseases and smokers
- ClassI,III&IV gingival recession
- Abnormal frenal attachments
- Interdental bone loss with tooth mobility
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: N / A
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: experimental group
Group A-15 patients were allocated to the microsurgical group for root coverage. following scaling and root planning, the laterally repositioned flap was done using the microsurgical approach Group B-15 Patients were allocated to the conventional group for root coverage following scaling and root planning, the laterally repositioned flap was done using the macrosurgical approach |
Group A: After administration of local anaesthesia using ophthalmic microsurgical knives a V-shaped incision was made in the gingival recession area. the gingiva was removed .the adjacent partial thickness pedicle flap was reflected from the donor area .the pedicle flap was then covered over the recipient site. then secured with 6-0 absorbable sling suture without tension. the surgical procedure was done with seilar microscope 40X magnification. Group B: After administration of local anaesthesia using 15 no blade a V-shaped incision was made in the gingival recession area . gingiva was removed .the adjacent partial thickness pedicle flap was reflected from the donor area .the pedicle flap was then covered over the recipient site. then carefully secured with 4-0 absorbable sling suture |
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
vertical depth of recession
Periodo de tiempo: Change in level of gingival margin from baseline to 6 months.
|
The height of gingival recession: From cementoenamel junction to the free gingival margin.
|
Change in level of gingival margin from baseline to 6 months.
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
horizontal width of recession
Periodo de tiempo: Change in horizontal dimension of gingival margin from baseline to 6 months.
|
The width of gingival recession: Horizontal dimension of gingival defect at the level of Cementoenamel junction..
|
Change in horizontal dimension of gingival margin from baseline to 6 months.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Investigadores
- Director de estudio: veerendranath reddy, MDS, Panineeya Mahavidyalaya Institute of Dental Sciences
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- kranthirecession
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .