A One-Day ACT Workshop for Emotional Eating
2019年10月24日 更新者：McGill University
Emotional eating is a behaviour that has been linked to weight concerns, mental health concerns, and disordered eating.
Effective interventions have been developed to treat emotional eating, however these exist solely in the context of promoting weight loss.
Emotional eating is not exclusive to those who struggle with weight and thus interventions are needed that target those who engage in emotional eating regardless of their weight status.
The present study aims to do so through the implementation of a one day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) workshop for emotional eaters.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
Emotional eating is defined as increased food consumption in response to negative emotions, and has been linked to weight concerns, mental health concerns, and disordered eating behaviours. Effective interventions have been developed that address emotional eating, namely to improve weight loss. Such interventions are based in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), which encourages tolerance of internal cues, such as emotions, and external cues, such as food.
Emotional eating, however, is not exclusive to those who struggle with their weight. Many individuals maintain a normal weight despite engaging in emotional eating. These individuals still consume an excess of high calorie (for which they somehow eventually compensate), high fat, and high sugar foods as part of their emotional eating. Unhealthy dietary habits such as these have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, as well as health concerns including diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Individuals with normal weight are not eligible for ACT programs described above, despite the increased risk of health concerns associated with emotional eating.
The present study aims to test the feasibility and acceptability of a one-day ACT workshop to reduce emotional eating and improve health that is not focused on weight loss as its primary outcome, and rather targets all individuals who engage in emotional eating.
研究の種類
介入
入学 (実際)
32
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。
研究場所
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal、Quebec、カナダ、H3A1G1
- McGill University
-
-
参加基準
研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
18年歳以上 (大人、高齢者)
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
はい
受講資格のある性別
全て
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Engaging in emotional eating as per a DEBQ-EE score of 3.25 or higher
- Being over the age of 18
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not meeting the DEBQ-EE 3.25 or higher inclusion criteria
- Being under the age of 18
研究計画
このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的：処理
- 割り当て：なし
- 介入モデル：単一グループの割り当て
- マスキング：なし（オープンラベル）
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的：ACT Workshop for Emotional Eating
All participants will be assigned to a one-day intervention using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) techniques to help reduce emotional eating.
|
This is a one-day intervention using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) technique to target and reduce emotional eating.
The intervention will be modeled after Frayn and Knäuper's (2016) brief emotional eating intervention, which was derived from Forman et al.'s (2013) "Mind Your Health program".
During the workshop, the following topics will be discussed, based on the three processes of ACT: (1) values clarification/commitment, (2) acceptance/distress tolerance, and (3) mindfulness/awareness.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Emotional Eating - 2-weeks Post-intervention
時間枠：Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Emotional eating, as assessed by the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire Emotional Eating Subscale (DEBQ-EE).
Participants are asked to rate the frequency with which they engage in particular eating behaviours, on a 5-point Likert-type rating scale from never (1) to very often (5), with higher scores reflecting higher emotional eating.
Only the emotional eating subscale of the DEBQ will be assessed and is calculated by averaging the 13 items that assess emotional eating.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Emotional Eating - 3-months Post-Intervention
時間枠：Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Emotional eating, as assessed by the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire Emotional Eating Subscale (DEBQ-EE).
Participants are asked to rate the frequency with which they engage in particular eating behaviours, on a 5-point Likert-type rating scale from never (1) to very often (5), with higher scores reflecting higher emotional eating.
Only the emotional eating subscale of the DEBQ will be assessed and is calculated by averaging the 13 items that assess emotional eating.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Distress Tolerance - 2-weeks Post-Intervention
時間枠：Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Distress tolerance, as assessed by the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS).
Participants are asked to indicate the extent to which they agree with statements aimed at assessing distress tolerance, absorption, appraisal, and regulation from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree), with lower scores reflecting lower distress tolerance.
Subscale scores are derived by calculating the means of the items that make up each subscale.
Total score is calculating by averaging the four subscales.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Distress Tolerance - 3-months Post-Intervention
時間枠：Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Distress tolerance, as assessed by the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS).
Participants are asked to indicate the extent to which they agree with statements aimed at assessing distress tolerance, absorption, appraisal, and regulation from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree), with lower scores reflecting lower distress tolerance.
Subscale scores are derived by calculating the means of the items that make up each subscale.
Total score is calculating by averaging the four subscales.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Food Craving Acceptance and Action - 2-weeks Post-intervention
時間枠：Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Food craving acceptance and action, as assessed by the Food Craving Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (FAAQ).
Items are rated on a 6-point Likert-type rating scale from 1 (very seldom true) to 6 (always true), with higher scores reflecting higher acceptance.
Total score is derived by summing all items.
Minimum score is 10 and maximum score is 60.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Food Craving Acceptance and Action - 3-months Post-intervention
時間枠：Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Food craving acceptance and action, as assessed by the Food Craving Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (FAAQ).
Items are rated on a 6-point Likert-type rating scale from 1 (very seldom true) to 6 (always true), with higher scores reflecting higher acceptance.
Total score is derived by summing all items.
Minimum score is 10 and maximum score is 60.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Mindful Eating - 2-weeks Post-intervention
時間枠：Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Mindful eating, as assessed by the Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ).
It is a 28-item self-report measure that assesses five domains of mindful eating: disinhibition, external cues, awareness, emotional response and distraction.
Participants are asked to indicate the extent to which extent they agree with each item from 1 ("never" / "rarely") to 4 ("usually"/ "always"), with higher scores reflecting higher levels of mindful eating.
Total score is derived by taking the mean of the five subscales.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Mindful Eating - 3-months Post-intervention
時間枠：Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Mindful eating, as assessed by the Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ).
It is a 28-item self-report measure that assesses five domains of mindful eating: disinhibition, external cues, awareness, emotional response and distraction.
Participants are asked to indicate the extent to which extent they agree with each item from 1 ("never" / "rarely") to 4 ("usually"/ "always"), with higher scores reflecting higher levels of mindful eating.
Total score is derived by taking the mean of the five subscales.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
ACT Values Application - 2-weeks Post-intervention
時間枠：Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Application of ACT values techniques taught during the workshop, as assessed by items developed by the study's authors.
Participants were asked to rate the extent to which they agreed with a number of value-based statements on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Values score was derived by taking the mean of the items, with higher scores reflecting greater value-consistent eating behaviors.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
ACT Values Application - 3-months Post-intervention
時間枠：Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Application of ACT values techniques taught during the workshop, as assessed by items developed by the study's authors.
Participants were asked to rate the extent to which they agreed with a number of value-based statements on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Values score was derived by taking the mean of the items, with higher scores reflecting greater value-consistent eating behaviors.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Emotional Eating Frequency - 2-weeks Post-intervention
時間枠：Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
As assessed by a self-report item developed by the study's authors.
Participants were asked to report the number of times they engaged in emotional eating in the past week.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Emotional Eating Frequency - 3-months Post-intervention
時間枠：Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
As assessed by a self-report item developed by the study's authors.
Participants were asked to report the number of times they engaged in emotional eating in the past week.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Ability to Stop Emotional Eating - 2-weeks Post-intervention
時間枠：Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
As assessed by a single self-report item developed by the study's authors.
Participants were asked to report the number of instances in which they began to engage in emotional eating and were able to stop themselves, on a scale from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (very often).
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Ability to Stop Emotional Eating - 3-months Post-intervention
時間枠：Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
As assessed by a single self-report item developed by the study's authors.
Participants were asked to report the number of instances in which they began to engage in emotional eating and were able to stop themselves, on a scale from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (very often).
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Feasibility Data: Recruitment, Eligibility, Attendance, and Attrition Rates
時間枠：Assessed throughout the duration of the study from the recruitment period to the completion of the workshops and follow-up questionnaires (i.e., over a 3-month period).
|
These include recruitment, eligibility, attendance, and attrition rates
|
Assessed throughout the duration of the study from the recruitment period to the completion of the workshops and follow-up questionnaires (i.e., over a 3-month period).
|
協力者と研究者
ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。
スポンサー
出版物と役立つリンク
研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。
一般刊行物
- Oliver G, Wardle J, Gibson EL. Stress and food choice: a laboratory study. Psychosom Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;62(6):853-65. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200011000-00016.
- Forman EM, Butryn ML, Juarascio AS, Bradley LE, Lowe MR, Herbert JD, Shaw JA. The mind your health project: a randomized controlled trial of an innovative behavioral treatment for obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Jun;21(6):1119-26. doi: 10.1002/oby.20169. Epub 2013 May 13. Erratum In: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Mar;22(3):971.
- Geliebter A, Aversa A. Emotional eating in overweight, normal weight, and underweight individuals. Eat Behav. 2003 Jan;3(4):341-7. doi: 10.1016/s1471-0153(02)00100-9.
- Hou L, Li F, Wang Y, Ou Z, Xu D, Tan W, Dai M. Association between dietary patterns and coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jan 15;8(1):781-90. eCollection 2015.
- Konttinen H, Mannisto S, Sarlio-Lahteenkorva S, Silventoinen K, Haukkala A. Emotional eating, depressive symptoms and self-reported food consumption. A population-based study. Appetite. 2010 Jun;54(3):473-9. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.01.014. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
- Lillis J, Niemeier HM, Thomas JG, Unick J, Ross KM, Leahey TM, Kendra KE, Dorfman L, Wing RR. A randomized trial of an acceptance-based behavioral intervention for weight loss in people with high internal disinhibition. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Dec;24(12):2509-2514. doi: 10.1002/oby.21680. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
- Sami W, Ansari T, Butt NS, Hamid MRA. Effect of diet on type 2 diabetes mellitus: A review. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):65-71.
- Schwingshackl L, Schwedhelm C, Hoffmann G, Lampousi AM, Knuppel S, Iqbal K, Bechthold A, Schlesinger S, Boeing H. Food groups and risk of all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;105(6):1462-1473. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.117.153148. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
- van Strien T, van de Laar FA, van Leeuwe JF, Lucassen PL, van den Hoogen HJ, Rutten GE, van Weel C. The dieting dilemma in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: does dietary restraint predict weight gain 4 years after diagnosis? Health Psychol. 2007 Jan;26(1):105-12. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.1.105.
- Frayn M, Khanyari S, Knauper B. A 1-day acceptance and commitment therapy workshop leads to reductions in emotional eating in adults. Eat Weight Disord. 2020 Oct;25(5):1399-1411. doi: 10.1007/s40519-019-00778-6. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
研究記録日
これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
2018年11月1日
一次修了 (実際)
2019年3月5日
研究の完了 (実際)
2019年3月5日
試験登録日
最初に提出
2018年11月2日
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
2018年11月14日
最初の投稿 (実際)
2018年11月16日
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
2019年11月14日
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
2019年10月24日
最終確認日
2019年10月1日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 143-0818
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
はい
IPD プランの説明
Study data, including the intervention manual, study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and outcomes will be shared with other researchers upon request.
IPD 共有時間枠
Upon publication of the study results.
IPD 共有アクセス基準
Upon request from other researchers.
IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
いいえ
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
いいえ
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。