A One-Day ACT Workshop for Emotional Eating
24 octobre 2019 mis à jour par: McGill University
Emotional eating is a behaviour that has been linked to weight concerns, mental health concerns, and disordered eating.
Effective interventions have been developed to treat emotional eating, however these exist solely in the context of promoting weight loss.
Emotional eating is not exclusive to those who struggle with weight and thus interventions are needed that target those who engage in emotional eating regardless of their weight status.
The present study aims to do so through the implementation of a one day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) workshop for emotional eaters.
Aperçu de l'étude
Statut
Complété
Les conditions
Intervention / Traitement
Description détaillée
Emotional eating is defined as increased food consumption in response to negative emotions, and has been linked to weight concerns, mental health concerns, and disordered eating behaviours. Effective interventions have been developed that address emotional eating, namely to improve weight loss. Such interventions are based in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), which encourages tolerance of internal cues, such as emotions, and external cues, such as food.
Emotional eating, however, is not exclusive to those who struggle with their weight. Many individuals maintain a normal weight despite engaging in emotional eating. These individuals still consume an excess of high calorie (for which they somehow eventually compensate), high fat, and high sugar foods as part of their emotional eating. Unhealthy dietary habits such as these have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, as well as health concerns including diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Individuals with normal weight are not eligible for ACT programs described above, despite the increased risk of health concerns associated with emotional eating.
The present study aims to test the feasibility and acceptability of a one-day ACT workshop to reduce emotional eating and improve health that is not focused on weight loss as its primary outcome, and rather targets all individuals who engage in emotional eating.
Type d'étude
Interventionnel
Inscription (Réel)
32
Phase
- N'est pas applicable
Contacts et emplacements
Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.
Lieux d'étude
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A1G1
- McGill University
-
-
Critères de participation
Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.
Critère d'éligibilité
Âges éligibles pour étudier
18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)
Accepte les volontaires sains
Oui
Sexes éligibles pour l'étude
Tout
La description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Engaging in emotional eating as per a DEBQ-EE score of 3.25 or higher
- Being over the age of 18
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not meeting the DEBQ-EE 3.25 or higher inclusion criteria
- Being under the age of 18
Plan d'étude
Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.
Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?
Détails de conception
- Objectif principal: Traitement
- Répartition: N / A
- Modèle interventionnel: Affectation à un seul groupe
- Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)
Armes et Interventions
Groupe de participants / Bras |
Intervention / Traitement |
|---|---|
|
Expérimental: ACT Workshop for Emotional Eating
All participants will be assigned to a one-day intervention using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) techniques to help reduce emotional eating.
|
This is a one-day intervention using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) technique to target and reduce emotional eating.
The intervention will be modeled after Frayn and Knäuper's (2016) brief emotional eating intervention, which was derived from Forman et al.'s (2013) "Mind Your Health program".
During the workshop, the following topics will be discussed, based on the three processes of ACT: (1) values clarification/commitment, (2) acceptance/distress tolerance, and (3) mindfulness/awareness.
|
Que mesure l'étude ?
Principaux critères de jugement
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Emotional Eating - 2-weeks Post-intervention
Délai: Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Emotional eating, as assessed by the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire Emotional Eating Subscale (DEBQ-EE).
Participants are asked to rate the frequency with which they engage in particular eating behaviours, on a 5-point Likert-type rating scale from never (1) to very often (5), with higher scores reflecting higher emotional eating.
Only the emotional eating subscale of the DEBQ will be assessed and is calculated by averaging the 13 items that assess emotional eating.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Emotional Eating - 3-months Post-Intervention
Délai: Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Emotional eating, as assessed by the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire Emotional Eating Subscale (DEBQ-EE).
Participants are asked to rate the frequency with which they engage in particular eating behaviours, on a 5-point Likert-type rating scale from never (1) to very often (5), with higher scores reflecting higher emotional eating.
Only the emotional eating subscale of the DEBQ will be assessed and is calculated by averaging the 13 items that assess emotional eating.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Mesures de résultats secondaires
Mesure des résultats |
Description de la mesure |
Délai |
|---|---|---|
|
Distress Tolerance - 2-weeks Post-Intervention
Délai: Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Distress tolerance, as assessed by the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS).
Participants are asked to indicate the extent to which they agree with statements aimed at assessing distress tolerance, absorption, appraisal, and regulation from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree), with lower scores reflecting lower distress tolerance.
Subscale scores are derived by calculating the means of the items that make up each subscale.
Total score is calculating by averaging the four subscales.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Distress Tolerance - 3-months Post-Intervention
Délai: Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Distress tolerance, as assessed by the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS).
Participants are asked to indicate the extent to which they agree with statements aimed at assessing distress tolerance, absorption, appraisal, and regulation from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree), with lower scores reflecting lower distress tolerance.
Subscale scores are derived by calculating the means of the items that make up each subscale.
Total score is calculating by averaging the four subscales.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Food Craving Acceptance and Action - 2-weeks Post-intervention
Délai: Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Food craving acceptance and action, as assessed by the Food Craving Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (FAAQ).
Items are rated on a 6-point Likert-type rating scale from 1 (very seldom true) to 6 (always true), with higher scores reflecting higher acceptance.
Total score is derived by summing all items.
Minimum score is 10 and maximum score is 60.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Food Craving Acceptance and Action - 3-months Post-intervention
Délai: Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Food craving acceptance and action, as assessed by the Food Craving Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (FAAQ).
Items are rated on a 6-point Likert-type rating scale from 1 (very seldom true) to 6 (always true), with higher scores reflecting higher acceptance.
Total score is derived by summing all items.
Minimum score is 10 and maximum score is 60.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Mindful Eating - 2-weeks Post-intervention
Délai: Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Mindful eating, as assessed by the Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ).
It is a 28-item self-report measure that assesses five domains of mindful eating: disinhibition, external cues, awareness, emotional response and distraction.
Participants are asked to indicate the extent to which extent they agree with each item from 1 ("never" / "rarely") to 4 ("usually"/ "always"), with higher scores reflecting higher levels of mindful eating.
Total score is derived by taking the mean of the five subscales.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Mindful Eating - 3-months Post-intervention
Délai: Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Mindful eating, as assessed by the Mindful Eating Questionnaire (MEQ).
It is a 28-item self-report measure that assesses five domains of mindful eating: disinhibition, external cues, awareness, emotional response and distraction.
Participants are asked to indicate the extent to which extent they agree with each item from 1 ("never" / "rarely") to 4 ("usually"/ "always"), with higher scores reflecting higher levels of mindful eating.
Total score is derived by taking the mean of the five subscales.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
ACT Values Application - 2-weeks Post-intervention
Délai: Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Application of ACT values techniques taught during the workshop, as assessed by items developed by the study's authors.
Participants were asked to rate the extent to which they agreed with a number of value-based statements on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Values score was derived by taking the mean of the items, with higher scores reflecting greater value-consistent eating behaviors.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
ACT Values Application - 3-months Post-intervention
Délai: Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
Application of ACT values techniques taught during the workshop, as assessed by items developed by the study's authors.
Participants were asked to rate the extent to which they agreed with a number of value-based statements on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Values score was derived by taking the mean of the items, with higher scores reflecting greater value-consistent eating behaviors.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Emotional Eating Frequency - 2-weeks Post-intervention
Délai: Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
As assessed by a self-report item developed by the study's authors.
Participants were asked to report the number of times they engaged in emotional eating in the past week.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Emotional Eating Frequency - 3-months Post-intervention
Délai: Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
As assessed by a self-report item developed by the study's authors.
Participants were asked to report the number of times they engaged in emotional eating in the past week.
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Ability to Stop Emotional Eating - 2-weeks Post-intervention
Délai: Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
As assessed by a single self-report item developed by the study's authors.
Participants were asked to report the number of instances in which they began to engage in emotional eating and were able to stop themselves, on a scale from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (very often).
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Ability to Stop Emotional Eating - 3-months Post-intervention
Délai: Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
As assessed by a single self-report item developed by the study's authors.
Participants were asked to report the number of instances in which they began to engage in emotional eating and were able to stop themselves, on a scale from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (very often).
|
Assessed from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention and 3-months post-intervention
|
|
Feasibility Data: Recruitment, Eligibility, Attendance, and Attrition Rates
Délai: Assessed throughout the duration of the study from the recruitment period to the completion of the workshops and follow-up questionnaires (i.e., over a 3-month period).
|
These include recruitment, eligibility, attendance, and attrition rates
|
Assessed throughout the duration of the study from the recruitment period to the completion of the workshops and follow-up questionnaires (i.e., over a 3-month period).
|
Collaborateurs et enquêteurs
C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.
Parrainer
Publications et liens utiles
La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.
Publications générales
- Oliver G, Wardle J, Gibson EL. Stress and food choice: a laboratory study. Psychosom Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;62(6):853-65. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200011000-00016.
- Forman EM, Butryn ML, Juarascio AS, Bradley LE, Lowe MR, Herbert JD, Shaw JA. The mind your health project: a randomized controlled trial of an innovative behavioral treatment for obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Jun;21(6):1119-26. doi: 10.1002/oby.20169. Epub 2013 May 13. Erratum In: Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Mar;22(3):971.
- Geliebter A, Aversa A. Emotional eating in overweight, normal weight, and underweight individuals. Eat Behav. 2003 Jan;3(4):341-7. doi: 10.1016/s1471-0153(02)00100-9.
- Hou L, Li F, Wang Y, Ou Z, Xu D, Tan W, Dai M. Association between dietary patterns and coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jan 15;8(1):781-90. eCollection 2015.
- Konttinen H, Mannisto S, Sarlio-Lahteenkorva S, Silventoinen K, Haukkala A. Emotional eating, depressive symptoms and self-reported food consumption. A population-based study. Appetite. 2010 Jun;54(3):473-9. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.01.014. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
- Lillis J, Niemeier HM, Thomas JG, Unick J, Ross KM, Leahey TM, Kendra KE, Dorfman L, Wing RR. A randomized trial of an acceptance-based behavioral intervention for weight loss in people with high internal disinhibition. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Dec;24(12):2509-2514. doi: 10.1002/oby.21680. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
- Sami W, Ansari T, Butt NS, Hamid MRA. Effect of diet on type 2 diabetes mellitus: A review. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):65-71.
- Schwingshackl L, Schwedhelm C, Hoffmann G, Lampousi AM, Knuppel S, Iqbal K, Bechthold A, Schlesinger S, Boeing H. Food groups and risk of all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;105(6):1462-1473. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.117.153148. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
- van Strien T, van de Laar FA, van Leeuwe JF, Lucassen PL, van den Hoogen HJ, Rutten GE, van Weel C. The dieting dilemma in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: does dietary restraint predict weight gain 4 years after diagnosis? Health Psychol. 2007 Jan;26(1):105-12. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.1.105.
- Frayn M, Khanyari S, Knauper B. A 1-day acceptance and commitment therapy workshop leads to reductions in emotional eating in adults. Eat Weight Disord. 2020 Oct;25(5):1399-1411. doi: 10.1007/s40519-019-00778-6. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
Dates d'enregistrement des études
Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.
Dates principales de l'étude
Début de l'étude (Réel)
1 novembre 2018
Achèvement primaire (Réel)
5 mars 2019
Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)
5 mars 2019
Dates d'inscription aux études
Première soumission
2 novembre 2018
Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
14 novembre 2018
Première publication (Réel)
16 novembre 2018
Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude
Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)
14 novembre 2019
Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité
24 octobre 2019
Dernière vérification
1 octobre 2019
Plus d'information
Termes liés à cette étude
Autres numéros d'identification d'étude
- 143-0818
Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)
Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?
OUI
Description du régime IPD
Study data, including the intervention manual, study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and outcomes will be shared with other researchers upon request.
Délai de partage IPD
Upon publication of the study results.
Critères d'accès au partage IPD
Upon request from other researchers.
Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD
- PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
- SÈVE
Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude
Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine
Non
Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .