Effect of Physician Race and Gender on Simulated Patients' Ratings
Effect of Physician Race and Gender on Simulated Patients' Ratings and Confidence in Their Physicians: A Randomized Trial
The purpose of the study was to determine whether the race and gender of a simulated doctor affected analog patients' reported confidence and satisfaction in the simulated doctor's diagnosis and treatment plan. The study used two randomized patient analog experiments.
This study is complete and pre-analysis plans (PAPs) for each experiment were published prior to data collection. The PAPs are available at: http://aspredicted.org/blind.php?x=43xj25 (Study 1) and https://aspredicted.org/blind.php?x=369st7 (Study 2).
調査の概要
状態
詳細な説明
Prior literature is unclear on whether patients display bias in their evaluations of physicians based on their race or gender. The investigators estimated the effects of physician race and gender using an online clinical vignette. Participants played the role of analog patients reporting to the Emergency Department (ED) with symptoms consistent with gastroenteritis. Participants were provided with a diagnosis of gastroenteritis by a simulated ED physician. The race (black or white) and gender (male or female) of the simulated physician was randomly assigned in a 2x2 factorial experiment. Simulated physicians provided a diagnosis of gastroenteritis and contradicted by an Online Symptom Checker. Following the physician's diagnosis and contradiction by the Online Symptom Checker, participants rated the simulated physician on survey measures of satisfaction and confidence in both the treatment plan and diagnosis. The main (null) hypothesis tested was that there were no differences across the four treatment arms (Black Female, Black Male, White Female, White Male). Participants for the first experiment (Study 1) were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) and participants for the second experiment (Study 2) were recruited from Lucid.
Primary Aim: To determine whether the race and gender of a simulated physician had a causal effect on participants' confidence and satisfaction in the physician's diagnosis and treatment plan in an ED setting.
Exploratory Aims: To determine whether the race and gender of a simulated physician had a casual effect on participants' perceptions of the warmth and competence of the physician, their willingness to sue or complain about the physician for an incorrect diagnosis, and their perceived fairness of the charge for the visit.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven、Connecticut、アメリカ、06520
- Yale University
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults over 18 years old
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants who reported current pregnancy
- Participants who reported a current or prior diagnosis of cancer
- Participants who reported a history of abdominal surgery
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:階乗代入
- マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:Simulated Black Male Physician
Participants are randomized to view the clinical vignette with a simulated Black Male physician.
|
Participants in this arm of the experiment viewed one of 10 randomly selected possible images of a simulated Black Male physician.
This image was paired with a written treatment and diagnosis of gastroenteritis alongside a contradictory diagnosis and treatment plan for appendicitis from an Online Symptom Checker.
|
|
実験的:Simulated Black Female Physician
Participants are randomized to view the clinical vignette with a simulated Black Female physician.
|
Participants in this arm of the experiment viewed one of 10 randomly selected possible images of a simulated Black Female physician.
This image was paired with a written treatment and diagnosis of gastroenteritis alongside a contradictory diagnosis and treatment plan for appendicitis from an Online Symptom Checker.
|
|
実験的:Simulated White Male Physician
Participants are randomized to view the clinical vignette with a simulated White Male physician.
|
Participants in this arm of the experiment viewed one of 10 randomly selected possible images of a simulated White Male physician.
This image was paired with a written treatment and diagnosis of gastroenteritis alongside a contradictory diagnosis and treatment plan for appendicitis from an Online Symptom Checker.
|
|
実験的:Simulated White Female Physician
Participants are randomized to view the clinical vignette with a simulated White Female physician.
|
Participants in this arm of the experiment viewed one of 10 randomly selected possible images of a simulated White Female physician.
This image was paired with a written treatment and diagnosis of gastroenteritis alongside a contradictory diagnosis and treatment plan for appendicitis from an Online Symptom Checker.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Confidence
時間枠:Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Believed Symptom Checker over Doctor
時間枠:Approximately 10 minutes
|
"Which diagnosis do you think is more likely to be correct?"
[the doctor's diagnosis (0); online symptom checker (1)]
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Likelihood of Requesting more Tests
時間枠:Approximately 10 minutes
|
"Would you ask the doctor to perform additional diagnostic tests?
(Such as the CT scan recommended by the Symptom Checker)."
[definitely not (1); probably not (2); might or might not (3); probably (4); definitely (5)]
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Patient Satisfaction: scale
時間枠:Approximately 10 minutes
|
"What number would you use to rate your care during this emergency room visit?" Study 1: [0 (worse possible care) to 100 (best possible care)] Study 2: [0 (worse possible care) to 10 (best possible care)]* *In Study 1, the Patient Satisfaction was measured using a 0-100 point scale. In Study 2, this was measured using a 10 point scale. For all analyses, this Patient Satisfaction outcome from Study 1 was rescaled to match the 0-10 point range in Study 2. |
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Likelihood to Recommend
時間枠:Approximately 10 minutes
|
"Would you recommend this doctor to your friends and family?"
[definitely not (1); probably not (2); might or might not (3); probably (4); definitely (5)]
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Warmth and Competence
時間枠:Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Willingness to sue or complain
時間枠:Approximately 10 minutes
|
"You take the doctor's advice and go home. Over the next few days, the pain in your abdomen got worse and you returned to the hospital where you were diagnosed with appendicitis. Your appendix had burst and you developed a serious infection. This required emergency surgery and an extended stay in the hospital's intensive Care Unit"*
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Fairness of the cost
時間枠:Approximately 10 minutes
|
"You would be charged about $350 for this emergency department visit. How fair do you think this charge is?" [0 = "Completely unfair" to 100 = "Completely Fair"]* *Fairness of the cost was only measured in Study 1. |
Approximately 10 minutes
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
出版物と役立つリンク
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 2000022317
- 12916 (AsPredicted.org)
- 9068 (その他の識別子:AsPredicted.org)
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
IPD 共有時間枠
IPD 共有アクセス基準
IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。