- ICH GCP
- Amerikanska kliniska prövningsregistret
- Klinisk prövning NCT04190901
Effect of Physician Race and Gender on Simulated Patients' Ratings
Effect of Physician Race and Gender on Simulated Patients' Ratings and Confidence in Their Physicians: A Randomized Trial
The purpose of the study was to determine whether the race and gender of a simulated doctor affected analog patients' reported confidence and satisfaction in the simulated doctor's diagnosis and treatment plan. The study used two randomized patient analog experiments.
This study is complete and pre-analysis plans (PAPs) for each experiment were published prior to data collection. The PAPs are available at: http://aspredicted.org/blind.php?x=43xj25 (Study 1) and https://aspredicted.org/blind.php?x=369st7 (Study 2).
Studieöversikt
Status
Betingelser
Detaljerad beskrivning
Prior literature is unclear on whether patients display bias in their evaluations of physicians based on their race or gender. The investigators estimated the effects of physician race and gender using an online clinical vignette. Participants played the role of analog patients reporting to the Emergency Department (ED) with symptoms consistent with gastroenteritis. Participants were provided with a diagnosis of gastroenteritis by a simulated ED physician. The race (black or white) and gender (male or female) of the simulated physician was randomly assigned in a 2x2 factorial experiment. Simulated physicians provided a diagnosis of gastroenteritis and contradicted by an Online Symptom Checker. Following the physician's diagnosis and contradiction by the Online Symptom Checker, participants rated the simulated physician on survey measures of satisfaction and confidence in both the treatment plan and diagnosis. The main (null) hypothesis tested was that there were no differences across the four treatment arms (Black Female, Black Male, White Female, White Male). Participants for the first experiment (Study 1) were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) and participants for the second experiment (Study 2) were recruited from Lucid.
Primary Aim: To determine whether the race and gender of a simulated physician had a causal effect on participants' confidence and satisfaction in the physician's diagnosis and treatment plan in an ED setting.
Exploratory Aims: To determine whether the race and gender of a simulated physician had a casual effect on participants' perceptions of the warmth and competence of the physician, their willingness to sue or complain about the physician for an incorrect diagnosis, and their perceived fairness of the charge for the visit.
Studietyp
Inskrivning (Faktisk)
Fas
- Inte tillämpbar
Kontakter och platser
Studieorter
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, Förenta staterna, 06520
- Yale University
-
-
Deltagandekriterier
Urvalskriterier
Åldrar som är berättigade till studier
Tar emot friska volontärer
Kön som är behöriga för studier
Beskrivning
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults over 18 years old
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants who reported current pregnancy
- Participants who reported a current or prior diagnosis of cancer
- Participants who reported a history of abdominal surgery
Studieplan
Hur är studien utformad?
Designdetaljer
- Primärt syfte: Hälsovårdsforskning
- Tilldelning: Randomiserad
- Interventionsmodell: Faktoriell uppgift
- Maskning: Ingen (Open Label)
Vapen och interventioner
Deltagargrupp / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Experimentell: Simulated Black Male Physician
Participants are randomized to view the clinical vignette with a simulated Black Male physician.
|
Participants in this arm of the experiment viewed one of 10 randomly selected possible images of a simulated Black Male physician.
This image was paired with a written treatment and diagnosis of gastroenteritis alongside a contradictory diagnosis and treatment plan for appendicitis from an Online Symptom Checker.
|
|
Experimentell: Simulated Black Female Physician
Participants are randomized to view the clinical vignette with a simulated Black Female physician.
|
Participants in this arm of the experiment viewed one of 10 randomly selected possible images of a simulated Black Female physician.
This image was paired with a written treatment and diagnosis of gastroenteritis alongside a contradictory diagnosis and treatment plan for appendicitis from an Online Symptom Checker.
|
|
Experimentell: Simulated White Male Physician
Participants are randomized to view the clinical vignette with a simulated White Male physician.
|
Participants in this arm of the experiment viewed one of 10 randomly selected possible images of a simulated White Male physician.
This image was paired with a written treatment and diagnosis of gastroenteritis alongside a contradictory diagnosis and treatment plan for appendicitis from an Online Symptom Checker.
|
|
Experimentell: Simulated White Female Physician
Participants are randomized to view the clinical vignette with a simulated White Female physician.
|
Participants in this arm of the experiment viewed one of 10 randomly selected possible images of a simulated White Female physician.
This image was paired with a written treatment and diagnosis of gastroenteritis alongside a contradictory diagnosis and treatment plan for appendicitis from an Online Symptom Checker.
|
Vad mäter studien?
Primära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Confidence
Tidsram: Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Believed Symptom Checker over Doctor
Tidsram: Approximately 10 minutes
|
"Which diagnosis do you think is more likely to be correct?"
[the doctor's diagnosis (0); online symptom checker (1)]
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Likelihood of Requesting more Tests
Tidsram: Approximately 10 minutes
|
"Would you ask the doctor to perform additional diagnostic tests?
(Such as the CT scan recommended by the Symptom Checker)."
[definitely not (1); probably not (2); might or might not (3); probably (4); definitely (5)]
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Patient Satisfaction: scale
Tidsram: Approximately 10 minutes
|
"What number would you use to rate your care during this emergency room visit?" Study 1: [0 (worse possible care) to 100 (best possible care)] Study 2: [0 (worse possible care) to 10 (best possible care)]* *In Study 1, the Patient Satisfaction was measured using a 0-100 point scale. In Study 2, this was measured using a 10 point scale. For all analyses, this Patient Satisfaction outcome from Study 1 was rescaled to match the 0-10 point range in Study 2. |
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Likelihood to Recommend
Tidsram: Approximately 10 minutes
|
"Would you recommend this doctor to your friends and family?"
[definitely not (1); probably not (2); might or might not (3); probably (4); definitely (5)]
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
Sekundära resultatmått
Resultatmått |
Åtgärdsbeskrivning |
Tidsram |
|---|---|---|
|
Warmth and Competence
Tidsram: Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Willingness to sue or complain
Tidsram: Approximately 10 minutes
|
"You take the doctor's advice and go home. Over the next few days, the pain in your abdomen got worse and you returned to the hospital where you were diagnosed with appendicitis. Your appendix had burst and you developed a serious infection. This required emergency surgery and an extended stay in the hospital's intensive Care Unit"*
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Fairness of the cost
Tidsram: Approximately 10 minutes
|
"You would be charged about $350 for this emergency department visit. How fair do you think this charge is?" [0 = "Completely unfair" to 100 = "Completely Fair"]* *Fairness of the cost was only measured in Study 1. |
Approximately 10 minutes
|
Samarbetspartners och utredare
Sponsor
Publikationer och användbara länkar
Studieavstämningsdatum
Studera stora datum
Studiestart (Faktisk)
Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)
Avslutad studie (Faktisk)
Studieregistreringsdatum
Först inskickad
Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Första postat (Faktisk)
Uppdateringar av studier
Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Faktisk)
Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna
Senast verifierad
Mer information
Termer relaterade till denna studie
Andra studie-ID-nummer
- 2000022317
- 12916 (AsPredicted.org)
- 9068 (Annan identifierare: AsPredicted.org)
Plan för individuella deltagardata (IPD)
Planerar du att dela individuella deltagardata (IPD)?
IPD-planbeskrivning
Tidsram för IPD-delning
Kriterier för IPD Sharing Access
IPD-delning som stöder informationstyp
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAV
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Läkemedels- och apparatinformation, studiedokument
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad läkemedelsprodukt
Studerar en amerikansk FDA-reglerad produktprodukt
Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .