- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT04190901
Effect of Physician Race and Gender on Simulated Patients' Ratings
Effect of Physician Race and Gender on Simulated Patients' Ratings and Confidence in Their Physicians: A Randomized Trial
The purpose of the study was to determine whether the race and gender of a simulated doctor affected analog patients' reported confidence and satisfaction in the simulated doctor's diagnosis and treatment plan. The study used two randomized patient analog experiments.
This study is complete and pre-analysis plans (PAPs) for each experiment were published prior to data collection. The PAPs are available at: http://aspredicted.org/blind.php?x=43xj25 (Study 1) and https://aspredicted.org/blind.php?x=369st7 (Study 2).
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Descrição detalhada
Prior literature is unclear on whether patients display bias in their evaluations of physicians based on their race or gender. The investigators estimated the effects of physician race and gender using an online clinical vignette. Participants played the role of analog patients reporting to the Emergency Department (ED) with symptoms consistent with gastroenteritis. Participants were provided with a diagnosis of gastroenteritis by a simulated ED physician. The race (black or white) and gender (male or female) of the simulated physician was randomly assigned in a 2x2 factorial experiment. Simulated physicians provided a diagnosis of gastroenteritis and contradicted by an Online Symptom Checker. Following the physician's diagnosis and contradiction by the Online Symptom Checker, participants rated the simulated physician on survey measures of satisfaction and confidence in both the treatment plan and diagnosis. The main (null) hypothesis tested was that there were no differences across the four treatment arms (Black Female, Black Male, White Female, White Male). Participants for the first experiment (Study 1) were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) and participants for the second experiment (Study 2) were recruited from Lucid.
Primary Aim: To determine whether the race and gender of a simulated physician had a causal effect on participants' confidence and satisfaction in the physician's diagnosis and treatment plan in an ED setting.
Exploratory Aims: To determine whether the race and gender of a simulated physician had a casual effect on participants' perceptions of the warmth and competence of the physician, their willingness to sue or complain about the physician for an incorrect diagnosis, and their perceived fairness of the charge for the visit.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, Estados Unidos, 06520
- Yale University
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults over 18 years old
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants who reported current pregnancy
- Participants who reported a current or prior diagnosis of cancer
- Participants who reported a history of abdominal surgery
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Pesquisa de serviços de saúde
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição fatorial
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Simulated Black Male Physician
Participants are randomized to view the clinical vignette with a simulated Black Male physician.
|
Participants in this arm of the experiment viewed one of 10 randomly selected possible images of a simulated Black Male physician.
This image was paired with a written treatment and diagnosis of gastroenteritis alongside a contradictory diagnosis and treatment plan for appendicitis from an Online Symptom Checker.
|
|
Experimental: Simulated Black Female Physician
Participants are randomized to view the clinical vignette with a simulated Black Female physician.
|
Participants in this arm of the experiment viewed one of 10 randomly selected possible images of a simulated Black Female physician.
This image was paired with a written treatment and diagnosis of gastroenteritis alongside a contradictory diagnosis and treatment plan for appendicitis from an Online Symptom Checker.
|
|
Experimental: Simulated White Male Physician
Participants are randomized to view the clinical vignette with a simulated White Male physician.
|
Participants in this arm of the experiment viewed one of 10 randomly selected possible images of a simulated White Male physician.
This image was paired with a written treatment and diagnosis of gastroenteritis alongside a contradictory diagnosis and treatment plan for appendicitis from an Online Symptom Checker.
|
|
Experimental: Simulated White Female Physician
Participants are randomized to view the clinical vignette with a simulated White Female physician.
|
Participants in this arm of the experiment viewed one of 10 randomly selected possible images of a simulated White Female physician.
This image was paired with a written treatment and diagnosis of gastroenteritis alongside a contradictory diagnosis and treatment plan for appendicitis from an Online Symptom Checker.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Confidence
Prazo: Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Believed Symptom Checker over Doctor
Prazo: Approximately 10 minutes
|
"Which diagnosis do you think is more likely to be correct?"
[the doctor's diagnosis (0); online symptom checker (1)]
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Likelihood of Requesting more Tests
Prazo: Approximately 10 minutes
|
"Would you ask the doctor to perform additional diagnostic tests?
(Such as the CT scan recommended by the Symptom Checker)."
[definitely not (1); probably not (2); might or might not (3); probably (4); definitely (5)]
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Patient Satisfaction: scale
Prazo: Approximately 10 minutes
|
"What number would you use to rate your care during this emergency room visit?" Study 1: [0 (worse possible care) to 100 (best possible care)] Study 2: [0 (worse possible care) to 10 (best possible care)]* *In Study 1, the Patient Satisfaction was measured using a 0-100 point scale. In Study 2, this was measured using a 10 point scale. For all analyses, this Patient Satisfaction outcome from Study 1 was rescaled to match the 0-10 point range in Study 2. |
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Likelihood to Recommend
Prazo: Approximately 10 minutes
|
"Would you recommend this doctor to your friends and family?"
[definitely not (1); probably not (2); might or might not (3); probably (4); definitely (5)]
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Warmth and Competence
Prazo: Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Willingness to sue or complain
Prazo: Approximately 10 minutes
|
"You take the doctor's advice and go home. Over the next few days, the pain in your abdomen got worse and you returned to the hospital where you were diagnosed with appendicitis. Your appendix had burst and you developed a serious infection. This required emergency surgery and an extended stay in the hospital's intensive Care Unit"*
|
Approximately 10 minutes
|
|
Fairness of the cost
Prazo: Approximately 10 minutes
|
"You would be charged about $350 for this emergency department visit. How fair do you think this charge is?" [0 = "Completely unfair" to 100 = "Completely Fair"]* *Fairness of the cost was only measured in Study 1. |
Approximately 10 minutes
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Publicações e links úteis
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 2000022317
- 12916 (AsPredicted.org)
- 9068 (Outro identificador: AsPredicted.org)
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Descrição do plano IPD
Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD
Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD
Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
- SEIVA
- CIF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .