Personalizing Interventions Using Real-World Interactions
Personalizing Interventions Using Real-World Interactions: Improving Symptoms and Social Functioning in Schizophrenia With Tailored Metacognitive Therapy
Social functioning deficits are among the most disabling and difficult to treat aspects of schizophrenia. An essential component of social functioning is metacognition-a process that is profoundly disrupted in schizophrenia and represents the ability to reflect upon the mental states of oneself and others. To date, treatment efforts in schizophrenia have been hindered by barriers in accurately monitoring client's real-world social interactions. Recently, wearable technologies have evolved to provide therapists with innovative, ecologically-valid tools. The Electronically Activated Recorder is a wearable audio recorder that collects behavioral samples at pre-programmed intervals; it holds great promise as a method for yielding concrete, real-world examples of social interactions that can be used by therapists in session to enhance metacognition. Despite the immense costs of social functioning deficits, no previous studies have investigated whether functioning can be improved by integrating wearable audio recorders with psychosocial interventions.
By enhancing therapy using a wearable recording device, this proposal's primary goal is to implement a novel intervention that targets metacognitive deficits to improve social functioning. The novel intervention will be tailored to individual clients-based on the content of recorded social interactions-in a way that is not possible using traditional psychotherapy. This will allow clients and therapists to step out of the therapy room by offering a window into how clients process material in real-world interactions. In this study, a randomized controlled trial will be conducted with two schizophrenia groups receiving six months of individualized: 1) Metacognition Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT) alone (Standard MERIT); and 2) Tailored MERIT using wearable audio recorders. In this study, our specific aims will test feasibility, effectiveness, and acceptability of Tailored MERIT.
調査の概要
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Positive screen for metacognitive dysfunction
- Serious Mental Illness diagnosis (schizophrenia-spectrum)
- Age 18-60
- English fluency
- Currently in non-acute phase of illness
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Current substance dependence
- Documented intellectual disability
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:処理
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:独身
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
アクティブコンパレータ:Standard MERIT
24 sessions of Metacognition Reflection and Insight Therapy
|
see arm description
|
|
実験的:Tailored MERIT
24 sessions of personalized Metacognition Reflection and Insight Therapy (sessions personalized using real-world interactions)
|
see arm description
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Global Functioning Scale: Social (GFS)
時間枠:Change from baseline social functioning to social functioning after 6 months of MERIT
|
10-point measure of social functioning (1 to 10, with increasing scores indicating greater social functioning)
|
Change from baseline social functioning to social functioning after 6 months of MERIT
|
|
Metacognitive Beliefs Questionnaire-Brief (MCQ-30)
時間枠:Change from baseline metacognition to metacognition after 6 months of MERIT
|
30 item measure of metacognition; each item is rated on a 1 to 4 scale with decreasing scores representing better metacognitive functioning.
|
Change from baseline metacognition to metacognition after 6 months of MERIT
|
|
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
時間枠:Change from baseline symptoms to symptoms after 6 months of MERIT
|
30 item measure of symptoms; each item is rated 1 to 7, with greater scores representing more severe symptoms (and lower scores indicating better functioning)
|
Change from baseline symptoms to symptoms after 6 months of MERIT
|
|
EAR Adherence
時間枠:Average of EAR adherence from baseline and 6 month assessment sessions
|
Objective measure of how often EAR was worn; 0 (not worn) and 1 (worn) scores given at each of 48 potential time points.
Total score represents frequency that the EAR is worn across all time points.
|
Average of EAR adherence from baseline and 6 month assessment sessions
|
|
EAR Experiential Questionnaire
時間枠:Average of EAR acceptability from baseline and 6 month assessment sessions
|
Assessment of how acceptable wearing the EAR was and how typical days were that EAR was worn.
Scores for each item range from 1 to 5 with greater scores indicating greater problems (and lower acceptability).
|
Average of EAR acceptability from baseline and 6 month assessment sessions
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of Life Scale
時間枠:Change from baseline quality of life to quality of life after 6 months of MERIT
|
21 item measure of quality of life; each item is rated from 0 to 6, with greater scores indicating greater quality of life.
|
Change from baseline quality of life to quality of life after 6 months of MERIT
|
|
Metacognition Assessment Scale- Abbreviated (MAS-A)
時間枠:Change from baseline metacognitive capacity to metacognitive capacity after 6 months of MERIT
|
Clinician-rated measure of metacognition using a semi structured clinical interview; four areas of capacity are rated (0 to 28 on overall scale); for each, increasing scores represent greater capacity.
|
Change from baseline metacognitive capacity to metacognitive capacity after 6 months of MERIT
|
|
Short Form Health Survey (SF-36
時間枠:Change from baseline functioning to functioning after 6 months of MERIT
|
36 item measure of social functioning and general health behaviors; each item on a different scale but greater scores indicate better overall functioning.
|
Change from baseline functioning to functioning after 6 months of MERIT
|
|
Objective Behaviors from the Electronically Activated Recorder
時間枠:Baseline, 3 months into MERIT, 6 months into MERIT (MERIT completed)
|
EAR coding can be implemented to rate different forms of objective behaviors; codes generated using different scales but primarily use a 0 (not present) or 1 (present) coding scheme.
Greater scores typically represent presence of that which is being coded.
|
Baseline, 3 months into MERIT, 6 months into MERIT (MERIT completed)
|
|
Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder
時間枠:Baseline, 3 months into MERIT, 6 months into MERIT (MERIT completed)
|
Insight measure; three items rated on 1 to 5 scale, with increasing scores indicating poorer insight.
|
Baseline, 3 months into MERIT, 6 months into MERIT (MERIT completed)
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
追加の関連 MeSH 用語
その他の研究ID番号
- MERIT EAR Study
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。