Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Personalizing Interventions Using Real-World Interactions

10 de diciembre de 2020 actualizado por: Kyle S. Minor, Indiana University

Personalizing Interventions Using Real-World Interactions: Improving Symptoms and Social Functioning in Schizophrenia With Tailored Metacognitive Therapy

Social functioning deficits are among the most disabling and difficult to treat aspects of schizophrenia. An essential component of social functioning is metacognition-a process that is profoundly disrupted in schizophrenia and represents the ability to reflect upon the mental states of oneself and others. To date, treatment efforts in schizophrenia have been hindered by barriers in accurately monitoring client's real-world social interactions. Recently, wearable technologies have evolved to provide therapists with innovative, ecologically-valid tools. The Electronically Activated Recorder is a wearable audio recorder that collects behavioral samples at pre-programmed intervals; it holds great promise as a method for yielding concrete, real-world examples of social interactions that can be used by therapists in session to enhance metacognition. Despite the immense costs of social functioning deficits, no previous studies have investigated whether functioning can be improved by integrating wearable audio recorders with psychosocial interventions.

By enhancing therapy using a wearable recording device, this proposal's primary goal is to implement a novel intervention that targets metacognitive deficits to improve social functioning. The novel intervention will be tailored to individual clients-based on the content of recorded social interactions-in a way that is not possible using traditional psychotherapy. This will allow clients and therapists to step out of the therapy room by offering a window into how clients process material in real-world interactions. In this study, a randomized controlled trial will be conducted with two schizophrenia groups receiving six months of individualized: 1) Metacognition Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT) alone (Standard MERIT); and 2) Tailored MERIT using wearable audio recorders. In this study, our specific aims will test feasibility, effectiveness, and acceptability of Tailored MERIT.

Descripción general del estudio

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

34

Fase

  • No aplica

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años a 60 años (Adulto)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Positive screen for metacognitive dysfunction
  • Serious Mental Illness diagnosis (schizophrenia-spectrum)
  • Age 18-60
  • English fluency
  • Currently in non-acute phase of illness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Current substance dependence
  • Documented intellectual disability

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Comparador activo: Standard MERIT
24 sessions of Metacognition Reflection and Insight Therapy
see arm description
Experimental: Tailored MERIT
24 sessions of personalized Metacognition Reflection and Insight Therapy (sessions personalized using real-world interactions)
see arm description

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Global Functioning Scale: Social (GFS)
Periodo de tiempo: Change from baseline social functioning to social functioning after 6 months of MERIT
10-point measure of social functioning (1 to 10, with increasing scores indicating greater social functioning)
Change from baseline social functioning to social functioning after 6 months of MERIT
Metacognitive Beliefs Questionnaire-Brief (MCQ-30)
Periodo de tiempo: Change from baseline metacognition to metacognition after 6 months of MERIT
30 item measure of metacognition; each item is rated on a 1 to 4 scale with decreasing scores representing better metacognitive functioning.
Change from baseline metacognition to metacognition after 6 months of MERIT
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
Periodo de tiempo: Change from baseline symptoms to symptoms after 6 months of MERIT
30 item measure of symptoms; each item is rated 1 to 7, with greater scores representing more severe symptoms (and lower scores indicating better functioning)
Change from baseline symptoms to symptoms after 6 months of MERIT
EAR Adherence
Periodo de tiempo: Average of EAR adherence from baseline and 6 month assessment sessions
Objective measure of how often EAR was worn; 0 (not worn) and 1 (worn) scores given at each of 48 potential time points. Total score represents frequency that the EAR is worn across all time points.
Average of EAR adherence from baseline and 6 month assessment sessions
EAR Experiential Questionnaire
Periodo de tiempo: Average of EAR acceptability from baseline and 6 month assessment sessions
Assessment of how acceptable wearing the EAR was and how typical days were that EAR was worn. Scores for each item range from 1 to 5 with greater scores indicating greater problems (and lower acceptability).
Average of EAR acceptability from baseline and 6 month assessment sessions

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Quality of Life Scale
Periodo de tiempo: Change from baseline quality of life to quality of life after 6 months of MERIT
21 item measure of quality of life; each item is rated from 0 to 6, with greater scores indicating greater quality of life.
Change from baseline quality of life to quality of life after 6 months of MERIT
Metacognition Assessment Scale- Abbreviated (MAS-A)
Periodo de tiempo: Change from baseline metacognitive capacity to metacognitive capacity after 6 months of MERIT
Clinician-rated measure of metacognition using a semi structured clinical interview; four areas of capacity are rated (0 to 28 on overall scale); for each, increasing scores represent greater capacity.
Change from baseline metacognitive capacity to metacognitive capacity after 6 months of MERIT
Short Form Health Survey (SF-36
Periodo de tiempo: Change from baseline functioning to functioning after 6 months of MERIT
36 item measure of social functioning and general health behaviors; each item on a different scale but greater scores indicate better overall functioning.
Change from baseline functioning to functioning after 6 months of MERIT
Objective Behaviors from the Electronically Activated Recorder
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 3 months into MERIT, 6 months into MERIT (MERIT completed)
EAR coding can be implemented to rate different forms of objective behaviors; codes generated using different scales but primarily use a 0 (not present) or 1 (present) coding scheme. Greater scores typically represent presence of that which is being coded.
Baseline, 3 months into MERIT, 6 months into MERIT (MERIT completed)
Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 3 months into MERIT, 6 months into MERIT (MERIT completed)
Insight measure; three items rated on 1 to 5 scale, with increasing scores indicating poorer insight.
Baseline, 3 months into MERIT, 6 months into MERIT (MERIT completed)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

1 de julio de 2016

Finalización primaria (Actual)

15 de marzo de 2020

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

15 de marzo de 2020

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

5 de diciembre de 2020

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

10 de diciembre de 2020

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

11 de diciembre de 2020

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

11 de diciembre de 2020

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

10 de diciembre de 2020

Última verificación

1 de diciembre de 2020

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • MERIT EAR Study

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir