이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Personalizing Interventions Using Real-World Interactions

2020년 12월 10일 업데이트: Kyle S. Minor, Indiana University

Personalizing Interventions Using Real-World Interactions: Improving Symptoms and Social Functioning in Schizophrenia With Tailored Metacognitive Therapy

Social functioning deficits are among the most disabling and difficult to treat aspects of schizophrenia. An essential component of social functioning is metacognition-a process that is profoundly disrupted in schizophrenia and represents the ability to reflect upon the mental states of oneself and others. To date, treatment efforts in schizophrenia have been hindered by barriers in accurately monitoring client's real-world social interactions. Recently, wearable technologies have evolved to provide therapists with innovative, ecologically-valid tools. The Electronically Activated Recorder is a wearable audio recorder that collects behavioral samples at pre-programmed intervals; it holds great promise as a method for yielding concrete, real-world examples of social interactions that can be used by therapists in session to enhance metacognition. Despite the immense costs of social functioning deficits, no previous studies have investigated whether functioning can be improved by integrating wearable audio recorders with psychosocial interventions.

By enhancing therapy using a wearable recording device, this proposal's primary goal is to implement a novel intervention that targets metacognitive deficits to improve social functioning. The novel intervention will be tailored to individual clients-based on the content of recorded social interactions-in a way that is not possible using traditional psychotherapy. This will allow clients and therapists to step out of the therapy room by offering a window into how clients process material in real-world interactions. In this study, a randomized controlled trial will be conducted with two schizophrenia groups receiving six months of individualized: 1) Metacognition Reflection and Insight Therapy (MERIT) alone (Standard MERIT); and 2) Tailored MERIT using wearable audio recorders. In this study, our specific aims will test feasibility, effectiveness, and acceptability of Tailored MERIT.

연구 개요

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

34

단계

  • 해당 없음

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 (성인)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Positive screen for metacognitive dysfunction
  • Serious Mental Illness diagnosis (schizophrenia-spectrum)
  • Age 18-60
  • English fluency
  • Currently in non-acute phase of illness

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Current substance dependence
  • Documented intellectual disability

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 치료
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
활성 비교기: Standard MERIT
24 sessions of Metacognition Reflection and Insight Therapy
see arm description
실험적: Tailored MERIT
24 sessions of personalized Metacognition Reflection and Insight Therapy (sessions personalized using real-world interactions)
see arm description

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Global Functioning Scale: Social (GFS)
기간: Change from baseline social functioning to social functioning after 6 months of MERIT
10-point measure of social functioning (1 to 10, with increasing scores indicating greater social functioning)
Change from baseline social functioning to social functioning after 6 months of MERIT
Metacognitive Beliefs Questionnaire-Brief (MCQ-30)
기간: Change from baseline metacognition to metacognition after 6 months of MERIT
30 item measure of metacognition; each item is rated on a 1 to 4 scale with decreasing scores representing better metacognitive functioning.
Change from baseline metacognition to metacognition after 6 months of MERIT
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
기간: Change from baseline symptoms to symptoms after 6 months of MERIT
30 item measure of symptoms; each item is rated 1 to 7, with greater scores representing more severe symptoms (and lower scores indicating better functioning)
Change from baseline symptoms to symptoms after 6 months of MERIT
EAR Adherence
기간: Average of EAR adherence from baseline and 6 month assessment sessions
Objective measure of how often EAR was worn; 0 (not worn) and 1 (worn) scores given at each of 48 potential time points. Total score represents frequency that the EAR is worn across all time points.
Average of EAR adherence from baseline and 6 month assessment sessions
EAR Experiential Questionnaire
기간: Average of EAR acceptability from baseline and 6 month assessment sessions
Assessment of how acceptable wearing the EAR was and how typical days were that EAR was worn. Scores for each item range from 1 to 5 with greater scores indicating greater problems (and lower acceptability).
Average of EAR acceptability from baseline and 6 month assessment sessions

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Quality of Life Scale
기간: Change from baseline quality of life to quality of life after 6 months of MERIT
21 item measure of quality of life; each item is rated from 0 to 6, with greater scores indicating greater quality of life.
Change from baseline quality of life to quality of life after 6 months of MERIT
Metacognition Assessment Scale- Abbreviated (MAS-A)
기간: Change from baseline metacognitive capacity to metacognitive capacity after 6 months of MERIT
Clinician-rated measure of metacognition using a semi structured clinical interview; four areas of capacity are rated (0 to 28 on overall scale); for each, increasing scores represent greater capacity.
Change from baseline metacognitive capacity to metacognitive capacity after 6 months of MERIT
Short Form Health Survey (SF-36
기간: Change from baseline functioning to functioning after 6 months of MERIT
36 item measure of social functioning and general health behaviors; each item on a different scale but greater scores indicate better overall functioning.
Change from baseline functioning to functioning after 6 months of MERIT
Objective Behaviors from the Electronically Activated Recorder
기간: Baseline, 3 months into MERIT, 6 months into MERIT (MERIT completed)
EAR coding can be implemented to rate different forms of objective behaviors; codes generated using different scales but primarily use a 0 (not present) or 1 (present) coding scheme. Greater scores typically represent presence of that which is being coded.
Baseline, 3 months into MERIT, 6 months into MERIT (MERIT completed)
Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder
기간: Baseline, 3 months into MERIT, 6 months into MERIT (MERIT completed)
Insight measure; three items rated on 1 to 5 scale, with increasing scores indicating poorer insight.
Baseline, 3 months into MERIT, 6 months into MERIT (MERIT completed)

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

스폰서

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2016년 7월 1일

기본 완료 (실제)

2020년 3월 15일

연구 완료 (실제)

2020년 3월 15일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2020년 12월 5일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2020년 12월 10일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2020년 12월 11일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2020년 12월 11일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2020년 12월 10일

마지막으로 확인됨

2020년 12월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다