このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Genicular Nerve Versus Adductor Canal Block for Postoperative Analgesia

2026年5月14日 更新者:Soha Saad Eldin Mohamed Hassouna、Zagazig University

Genicular Nerve Versus Adductor Canal Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Severe postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA ) has been shown to negatively affect early mobilization, physical rehabilitation, time to discharge, and overall post-operative recovery.Therefore, reducing postoperative pain and early mobilization has become critical in reducing early mortality, preventing future chronic pain, and limiting the use of opioids The adductor canal block (ACB) has been found to be an excellent alternative to the FNB, providing adequate analgesia to the anterior knee compartment while enabling an improved postoperative range of motion by sparing motor branches to the quadriceps muscles . However, patients do not achieve adequate posterior knee analgesia as ACB pain relief is primarily limited to the anterior capsule of the knee.

Genicular nerve block (GNB) and radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves (RFGN) were originally introduced by Choi et al. as a therapeutic alternative for chronic knee OA and were quickly adopted for use in patients undergoing TKA due to the significant pain reduction and functional improvement observed in these patients . GNBs target five main innervating branches of the knee, including the superomedial, inferomedial, superolateral, inferolateral genicular nerves, and the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

Chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA), an epidemic among aging populations, is a leading source of chronic pain in the United States and other developed countries . The rise in prevalence of knee OA is a direct result of factors including longer life expectancy and increased body mass index (BMI). It has been reported that at least 19% of American adults aged 45 years and older are affected . Severe postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA ) has been shown to negatively affect early mobilization, physical rehabilitation, time to discharge, and overall post-op recovery

.Therefore, reducing postoperative pain and early mobilization has become critical in reducing early mortality, preventing future chronic pain, and limiting the use of opioids . Balancing pain control with patient ambulation often proves to be a challenge due to both the motor blocking effects of many proximal nerve blocks and the often inadequate analgesia associated with more superficial periarticular injections . Therefore, numerous modalities of analgesic treatment combining different methods of nerve blockade for effective postoperative analgesia and faster functional recovery have been discussed . However, the superior technique is yet to be

determined. Successful postoperative analgesia for TKA requires careful consideration of knee innervation, with an emphasis placed on branches of the femoral nerve innervating the anterior and medical aspects of the knee and branches of the sciatic nerve innervating the posterior aspects of the knee capsule . In the context of nerve blockade, femoral nerve block (FNB) has traditionally been a critical component in the multimodal management of pain in TKA patients due to the high analgesic efficacy and the minimal risks associated. However, FNB is associated with decreased quadriceps motor strength leading to limited physical therapy (PT) participation, delayed ambulation, and discharge . The adductor canal block (ACB) has been found to be an excellent alternative to the FNB, providing adequate analgesia to the anterior knee compartment while enabling an improved postoperative range of motion by sparing motor branches to the quadriceps muscles . However, patients do not achieve adequate posterior knee analgesia as ACB pain relief is primarily limited to the anterior capsule of the knee.

Genicular nerve block (GNB) and radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves (RFGN) were originally introduced by Choi et al. as a therapeutic alternative for chronic knee OA and were quickly adopted for use in patients undergoing TKA due to the significant pain reduction and functional improvement observed in these patients . GNBs target five main innervating branches of the knee, including the superomedial, inferomedial, superolateral, inferolateral genicular nerves, and the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve. Several bony landmarks surrounding these nerves aid in proper needle placement under fluoroscopic guidance . The GNB has a motor-sparing effect that is desirable for early ambulation postoperatively, better PT, and earlier discharge .

研究の種類

介入

入学 (推定)

42

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • Alsharqia
      • Zagazig、Alsharqia、エジプト、4115
        • Faculty of Medicine - Zagazig University

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

  • 高齢者

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient acceptance.
  • Sex: both; male and female.
  • Age: over 65 years old.
  • American society of anesthesiologists (ASA): II .
  • Body mass index (BMI) less than 35 kg/m2.
  • Operation : elective unilateral TKA.
  • Duration of surgery : 2-3 hours.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of allergy to local anesthetics (lidocaine or bupivicaine).
  • Coexisting hematologic disorders or malnourished patient.
  • Pre-existing major organ dysfunction including hepatic or renal failure, and left ventricular ejection fraction <30%
  • Peripheral neuropathy.
  • Patients with a diagnosis of cognitive impairment or significant psychiatric illness.
  • Skin infection at site of block.
  • Contraindication to spinal anesthesia as coagulopathy and infection at site of injection.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:防止
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:ダブル

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
他の:control group
Receive spinal anesthesia
spinal anesthesia will be given (under complete aseptic conditions) at the level of L3/4 while the patient in the sitting position using a spinal needle 25 G x 3.5 inches with injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 3ml plus fentanyl 25 microgram .
アクティブコンパレータ:Genicular nerve block group
Receive Genicular Nerve Block

For the superomedial genicular nerve, a linear transducer will be placed along the longitudinal plane of the femur to visualize vastus medialis, the distal femur, and the genicular artery. Using an in-plane technique, a 10-cm echogenic 21-gauge needle will be advanced in the cephalad to the caudad direction until the needle contacted femoral shaft, just cephalad to the genicular artery, and 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected to spread along the femoral periosteum. This same technique, using 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine, will be used in a mirror image on the lateral epicondyle to block the superolateral genicular nerve.

To target the inferomedial genicular nerve, a linear transducer will be placed in the sagittal plane on the anterior medial tibia.

アクティブコンパレータ:Adductor canal block group
Receive Adductor canal block
The transducer will be placed anteromedially midway between inguinal crease and medial condyle to identify sartorius muscle. Probe will be positioned perpendicular to the femoral artery and using in-plane technique with needle directed from lateral to medial to deposit local anesthetic under sartorius and around the femoral artery. 15ml bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
changes of pain assessment
時間枠:time frame ( at PACU, 2 hours (h ) , 4 , 8 , 12 , 16 , 24 hours postoperatively )
visual analogue scale
time frame ( at PACU, 2 hours (h ) , 4 , 8 , 12 , 16 , 24 hours postoperatively )

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Modified Bromage scale
時間枠:at PACU, 3 hours and 6 hours postoperatively
no motor nerveblock in the lower extremity = 0 point; the affected limb cannot lift the leg = 1 point; failure to bend the knee of the affected limb = 2 points; and failure to bend the ankle = 3points
at PACU, 3 hours and 6 hours postoperatively

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

捜査官

  • 主任研究者:Soha Saad mohamed Hassouna, PHD、Faculty of Medicine - Zagazig University

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2023年10月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2026年5月6日

研究の完了 (推定)

2026年6月19日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年5月9日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年5月14日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年5月15日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年5月15日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年5月14日

最終確認日

2026年5月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

はい

IPD プランの説明

Planned after completion of the study and publications

IPD 共有時間枠

Planned after completion of the study and publications

IPD 共有アクセス基準

Contact with principal investigator

IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

購読する