- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT07588958
Genicular Nerve Versus Adductor Canal Block for Postoperative Analgesia
Genicular Nerve Versus Adductor Canal Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
Severe postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA ) has been shown to negatively affect early mobilization, physical rehabilitation, time to discharge, and overall post-operative recovery.Therefore, reducing postoperative pain and early mobilization has become critical in reducing early mortality, preventing future chronic pain, and limiting the use of opioids The adductor canal block (ACB) has been found to be an excellent alternative to the FNB, providing adequate analgesia to the anterior knee compartment while enabling an improved postoperative range of motion by sparing motor branches to the quadriceps muscles . However, patients do not achieve adequate posterior knee analgesia as ACB pain relief is primarily limited to the anterior capsule of the knee.
Genicular nerve block (GNB) and radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves (RFGN) were originally introduced by Choi et al. as a therapeutic alternative for chronic knee OA and were quickly adopted for use in patients undergoing TKA due to the significant pain reduction and functional improvement observed in these patients . GNBs target five main innervating branches of the knee, including the superomedial, inferomedial, superolateral, inferolateral genicular nerves, and the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve.
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Descrizione dettagliata
Chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA), an epidemic among aging populations, is a leading source of chronic pain in the United States and other developed countries . The rise in prevalence of knee OA is a direct result of factors including longer life expectancy and increased body mass index (BMI). It has been reported that at least 19% of American adults aged 45 years and older are affected . Severe postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA ) has been shown to negatively affect early mobilization, physical rehabilitation, time to discharge, and overall post-op recovery
.Therefore, reducing postoperative pain and early mobilization has become critical in reducing early mortality, preventing future chronic pain, and limiting the use of opioids . Balancing pain control with patient ambulation often proves to be a challenge due to both the motor blocking effects of many proximal nerve blocks and the often inadequate analgesia associated with more superficial periarticular injections . Therefore, numerous modalities of analgesic treatment combining different methods of nerve blockade for effective postoperative analgesia and faster functional recovery have been discussed . However, the superior technique is yet to be
determined. Successful postoperative analgesia for TKA requires careful consideration of knee innervation, with an emphasis placed on branches of the femoral nerve innervating the anterior and medical aspects of the knee and branches of the sciatic nerve innervating the posterior aspects of the knee capsule . In the context of nerve blockade, femoral nerve block (FNB) has traditionally been a critical component in the multimodal management of pain in TKA patients due to the high analgesic efficacy and the minimal risks associated. However, FNB is associated with decreased quadriceps motor strength leading to limited physical therapy (PT) participation, delayed ambulation, and discharge . The adductor canal block (ACB) has been found to be an excellent alternative to the FNB, providing adequate analgesia to the anterior knee compartment while enabling an improved postoperative range of motion by sparing motor branches to the quadriceps muscles . However, patients do not achieve adequate posterior knee analgesia as ACB pain relief is primarily limited to the anterior capsule of the knee.
Genicular nerve block (GNB) and radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves (RFGN) were originally introduced by Choi et al. as a therapeutic alternative for chronic knee OA and were quickly adopted for use in patients undergoing TKA due to the significant pain reduction and functional improvement observed in these patients . GNBs target five main innervating branches of the knee, including the superomedial, inferomedial, superolateral, inferolateral genicular nerves, and the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve. Several bony landmarks surrounding these nerves aid in proper needle placement under fluoroscopic guidance . The GNB has a motor-sparing effect that is desirable for early ambulation postoperatively, better PT, and earlier discharge .
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Stimato)
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Alsharqia
-
Zagazig, Alsharqia, Egitto, 4115
- Faculty of Medicine - Zagazig University
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
- Adulto più anziano
Accetta volontari sani
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient acceptance.
- Sex: both; male and female.
- Age: over 65 years old.
- American society of anesthesiologists (ASA): II .
- Body mass index (BMI) less than 35 kg/m2.
- Operation : elective unilateral TKA.
- Duration of surgery : 2-3 hours.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of allergy to local anesthetics (lidocaine or bupivicaine).
- Coexisting hematologic disorders or malnourished patient.
- Pre-existing major organ dysfunction including hepatic or renal failure, and left ventricular ejection fraction <30%
- Peripheral neuropathy.
- Patients with a diagnosis of cognitive impairment or significant psychiatric illness.
- Skin infection at site of block.
- Contraindication to spinal anesthesia as coagulopathy and infection at site of injection.
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Prevenzione
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Doppio
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Altro: control group
Receive spinal anesthesia
|
spinal anesthesia will be given (under complete aseptic conditions) at the level of L3/4 while the patient in the sitting position using a spinal needle 25 G x 3.5 inches with injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 3ml plus fentanyl 25 microgram .
|
|
Comparatore attivo: Genicular nerve block group
Receive Genicular Nerve Block
|
For the superomedial genicular nerve, a linear transducer will be placed along the longitudinal plane of the femur to visualize vastus medialis, the distal femur, and the genicular artery. Using an in-plane technique, a 10-cm echogenic 21-gauge needle will be advanced in the cephalad to the caudad direction until the needle contacted femoral shaft, just cephalad to the genicular artery, and 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected to spread along the femoral periosteum. This same technique, using 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine, will be used in a mirror image on the lateral epicondyle to block the superolateral genicular nerve. To target the inferomedial genicular nerve, a linear transducer will be placed in the sagittal plane on the anterior medial tibia. |
|
Comparatore attivo: Adductor canal block group
Receive Adductor canal block
|
The transducer will be placed anteromedially midway between inguinal crease and medial condyle to identify sartorius muscle.
Probe will be positioned perpendicular to the femoral artery and using in-plane technique with needle directed from lateral to medial to deposit local anesthetic under sartorius and around the femoral artery.
15ml bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
changes of pain assessment
Lasso di tempo: time frame ( at PACU, 2 hours (h ) , 4 , 8 , 12 , 16 , 24 hours postoperatively )
|
visual analogue scale
|
time frame ( at PACU, 2 hours (h ) , 4 , 8 , 12 , 16 , 24 hours postoperatively )
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Modified Bromage scale
Lasso di tempo: at PACU, 3 hours and 6 hours postoperatively
|
no motor nerveblock in the lower extremity = 0 point; the affected limb cannot lift the leg = 1 point; failure to bend the knee of the affected limb = 2 points; and failure to bend the ankle = 3points
|
at PACU, 3 hours and 6 hours postoperatively
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Sponsor
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Soha Saad mohamed Hassouna, PHD, Faculty of Medicine - Zagazig University
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
Completamento primario (Stimato)
Completamento dello studio (Stimato)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Termini MeSH pertinenti aggiuntivi
- Prodotti chimici organici
- Composti eterociclici, 1-anello
- Composti eterociclici
- Anilides
- Amides
- Composti di anilina
- Ammine
- Piperidine
- Fattori socioeconomici
- Caratteristiche della popolazione
- Anestesia e analgesia
- Demografia
- Anestesia, conduzione
- Anestesia
- Caratteristiche familiari
- Stato civile
- Bupivacaina
- Fentanil
- Anestesia, spinale
- Singola persona
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- 10793-14/5-2023
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
Descrizione del piano IPD
Periodo di condivisione IPD
Criteri di accesso alla condivisione IPD
Tipo di informazioni di supporto alla condivisione IPD
- STUDIO_PROTOCOLLO
- LINFA
- ICF
- RSI
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .